蒂莫西•加顿艾什在勃兰登堡门 言论自由大讨论的主任蒂莫西•加顿艾什在柏林牆倒塌的二十二周年紀念日讨论信息和通讯面临的新障碍。 发表时间： 2月 14, 2012 with 没有评论 分享文章 print Print 继续阅读: CensorshipGermanyHistoryJournalismNational securityPolitics 评论 (1) 读者须知：自动翻译由Google翻译提供，虽然可以反映作者大意，但不一定能提供精准的译意。 SONIA 2月 15, 2012 9:12 下午 reply登录以回复 report Report comment It was a delight to hear young Germans discussing the problems of freedom of speech with Timothy Garton Ash. I agree with John Stuart Mill that our freedom is limited by the freedom of others. Freedom of speech should not include messages of hate. 以任何语言评论 取消回复要发表评论，您必须先登录。
01 Lifeblood We – all human beings – must be free and able to express ourselves, and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas, regardless of frontiers.
08 Secrecy We must be empowered to challenge all limits to freedom of information justified on such grounds as national security.
04 Journalism We require uncensored, diverse, trustworthy media so we can make well-informed decisions and participate fully in political life.
05 Diversity We express ourselves openly and with robust civility about all kinds of human difference.
07 Privacy We must be able to protect our privacy and to counter slurs on our reputations, but not prevent scrutiny that is in the public interest.
09 Icebergs We defend the internet and other systems of communication against illegitimate encroachments by both public and private powers.
What is ‘dehumanising’ speech? Eric Heinze provocatively argues that no-platformers need to look into the mirror and examine their own blind spots.
Glasnost! Nine ways Facebook can make itself a better forum for free speech and democracy Free Speech Debate co-authors an Oxford-Stanford report on Facebook.
‘Lenin-fall’: free speech and the politics of memory in Ukraine O.T. Jones argues that the Ukrainian state should not restrict open historical debate but use its 'expressive' powers to foster a nuanced understanding of the past.
Are you sitting comfortably? How safe spaces became dangerous We must distinguish between legitimate and illegitimate safe spaces, argues Eric Heinze.
Don’t blame news polarisation on the internet…it’s not the technology, stupid! The internet does not guarantee polarised news, argues Richard Fletcher.
Bridging the deep digital divide in India Only 17% of rural India has internet access. But citizen journalism is giving voice to minorities says Arpita Biswas.
Russia: ‘The Church has an enemy in every home.’ It’s television. Helen Haft explains how the Orthodox Church has eroded freedom of the media and lobbied for the 2013 law against offending religious feelings.
Are we losing the media we need for democracy? Timothy Garton Ash discusses the importance of and whether we are losing the media for democracy at the General Editors Network Summit 2017 in Vienna.
The internet alone will not set Africa free Iginio Gagliardone explores the surprising technopolitics of two competing visions of the internet, US and Chinese, in Ethiopia.
Freedom of speech in Japan and the Designated Secrets Law Arthur Stockwin explains the four main areas where free speech is under threat in Japan.
Israel, no-platforming – and why there’s no such thing as ‘narrow exceptions’ to campus free speech Eric Heinze argues that it is contradictory to the principles of free speech to criticise the Israeli ambassador to Britain online and then no-platform him at a university talk.
reply report Report comment
It was a delight to hear young Germans discussing the problems of freedom of speech with Timothy Garton Ash.
I agree with John Stuart Mill that our freedom is limited by the freedom of others. Freedom of speech should not include messages of hate.