10साहस

हम अपने निर्णय खुद लेते है और उसके परिणाम स्वरूप किसी भी परिस्थिति के लिए तैयार रहेंगे

Academia (2)
Access (2)
Anonymity (4)
Arab Spring (1)
Art (6)
Australia (1)
Blasphemy (3)
Brazil (1)
Canada (1)
Celebrity (2)
Censorship (5)
Charlie Hebdo (1)
China (2)
Christianity (3)
Civility (8)
Colonialism (2)
Corruption (1)
Defamation (2)
Democracy (6)
Discrimination (1)
Education (4)
Egypt (1)
Facebook (1)
Film (1)
France (2)
Freedom (12)
Genocide (1)
Germany (1)
Governance (3)
Hate speech (1)
Hinduism (2)
History (7)
Homosexuality (1)
Hunger strike (1)
India (6)
Internet (9)
Internet companies (1)
Islam (2)
Japan (2)
Journalism (4)
Knowledge (4)
Latin America (1)
Law (10)
Liberalism (5)
Literature (1)
Media (5)
Memory laws (1)
Middle East (1)
Morality (3)
Multiculturalism (1)
National security (6)
Net neutrality (5)
Netherlands (1)
Nudity (4)
Pakistan (1)
Politics (10)
Pornography (4)
Power (10)
Privacy (6)
Protest (4)
Public Morality (9)
Regulation (1)
Religion (5)
Reputation (3)
Right to information (5)
Russia (1)
Satire (4)
Science (1)
Social media (2)
Surveillance (1)
Technology (5)
Twitter (1)
United Kingdom (1)
United States (1)
University (1)
Violence (5)
Whistleblowing (1)
Wikipedia (2)

			
					Peeing on Pétain
				
Eric Heinze examines the boundary between civil disobedience and desecration.  

					Law and historical memory: theorising the discipline
				
Free expression should not be considered as ‘just another’ human right. Any truly participatory political system cannot exist without it nor any legal system linked to such politics, argues Eric Heinze.

					Arseny Bobrovsky talks about his weird and wonderful @KermlinRussia parody Twitter account
				
Arseny Bobrovksy of the parody account Kermlin Russia, talks to Helen Haft about self-censorship in Russia.

					Art with the ‘courage of thought’ is the best response to ‘hate speech’
				
Hungarian academic and performer Peter Molnar explains the importance of Gondolatbátorság to his ‘Hate Speech’ Monologues.

					Is there a universal right to free speech and what are its limits?
				
Timothy Garton Ash in conversation with Nigel Warburton, as part of the Philosophy in the Bookshop series at Blackwell’s, Oxford.

					Ben Wizner, Edward Snowden’s lawyer: To what extent should government be allowed to curtail civil liberties for the sake of national security?
				
Ben Wizner, Edward Snowden’s ACLU lawyer, reflects on the state of and importance of the right to free speech in 2017. He argues we must not overuse the term ‘national security’ or surrender our right to privacy because we have nothing to hide, for we would not deny somebody the right to free speech because they had nothing to say.

					An introductory guide to the ten principles
				
Our social media team have created a new way to explore the 10 principles on Youtube.

					Free speech debates are more than ‘radicals’ vs ‘liberals’
				
Eric Heinze argues that the radicals and liberal grounds for free speech are not mutually exclusive.

					Hunting the dissident: The case of Leopoldo López
				
Maryhen Jiménez Morales examines the use of state power to silence dissent in modern Venezuela.

					A Turkish newspaper is shut down, condolences accepted
				
Ezgi Basaran cries out at the forced end of Radikal, the Turkish newspaper she used to edit.

					Kisha clubs in Japan: an impregnable fortress of information
				
Kimiko Kuga examines the institution of the kisha club and their role in controlling information in Japan.

					Free speech and the duty of loyalty
				
Sissel Trygstad examines employees’ rights in Norwegian workplaces.

					How old-fashioned violence and repression thwarted the ‘Facebook revolution’ in Egypt
				
Max Gallien contrasts Tahrir Square in 2011 and 2016.

					Why people shouldn’t feel the need to censor themselves
				
Roger Scruton argues that self-censorship can be as much a threat to free speech as its government equivalent.

					Courage
				
We decide for ourselves and face the consequences.

					In India, the censor’s razor is here to stay
				
Udit Bhatia explores the changing nature of state censorship of film in India and prospects for the future.

					‘Innocence of Muslims’ and the manufacture of outrage
				
Danyal Kazim explores the violent reaction to the YouTube video in Pakistan – starting with trying to access it from there.

					Why ‘no-platforming’ those who peddle hate speech does not pose a free speech issue
				
Purushottam Vikas engages with criticisms directed at a controversial petition regarding an Oxford India Society speaking event.

					Charlie Hebdo cartoons: to republish or not to republish?
				
Sarah Glatte explores the question which divided the world’s media.

					Silencing India’s daughters
				
Vanya Bhargav explains the battle behind the Indian government’s ban on a BBC documentary about a notorious gang rape.

					What did the Buddha mean by ‘right speech’?
				
Matthew Walton explores the deeper Buddhist context of right speech – and soul-searching on Buddhist internet message boards.

					Should ISPs be told to block “adult” content?
				
Internet Service Providers do not merely route data packets from end-to-end, but are heavily involved in monitoring  their customers’ online activities. Ian Brown discusses the implications of Britain’s suggested “voluntary” opting out of “adult content”, with little parliamentary and court involvement. 

					14 year-old’s Twitter prank leads to arrest in the Netherlands
				
A prank by a 14 year-old Dutch girl on Twitter prompted both her arrest – and broader questions about free speech, as Max Harris discusses.

					Egypt: the show is over
				
Bassem Youssef and the Egyptian struggle for freedom of speech.

					The world through the eyes of Russian state television
				
Robert Coalson looks at how Russian television depicts everything from the crisis in Ukraine to the war in Syria.

					Why Yale UP did not publish the Danish cartoons
				
John Donatich, the director of Yale University Press, explains and defends his decision not to include illustrations in Jytte Klausen’s book. 

					Warum Yale University Press die dänischen Cartoons nicht veröffentlicht hat
				
John Donatich, Direktor der Yale University Press, erklärt und verteidigt seine Entscheidung, Jytte Klausens Buch ohne Illustrationen zu publizieren.

					‘They used the oven to get tanned, you know…’
				
Marc-Antoine Dilhac recounts how he confronted anti-semitic prejudice in a French classroom, and argues that more good  comes from an open debate about hate speech than from banning it. 

					Can Australia distinguish between art and pornography?
				
Kim Wilkinson examines the case of celebrated Australian artist Bill Henson, who caused controversy in 2008 with his photography that featured images of naked teenagers.  

					Britain’s proposed online porn filters
				
How do we strike the right balance between freedom of expression and child protection? Sarah Glatte explores a proposal by the British government.

					Does a British Museum exhibition turn porn into art?
				
Katie Engelhart visits a shunga exhibition at the British Museum, and asks if the sexually explicit can be art. Along the way she explores issues of artistic intent and temporality. 

					Should society tolerate all forms of art?
				
We regularly highlight comments that have made an impression on us. FSD user Perreaoult argues that Art has to be completely free as an instrument of expression.

खोजें

आपका अकाउंट

भाषा