按类别查看 'Privacy' 包含 135 发布内容 menu按关键词查找 Academia (2)Access (20)Africa (6)Anonymity (10)Antisemitism (1)Arab Spring (5)Art (13)Article 19 (2)Atheism (2)Australia (2)Blasphemy (16)Blogger (6)Books (1)Brazil (3)Buddhism (1)Burma (1)Canada (3)Celebrity (5)Censorship (36)Charlie Hebdo (2)Child abuse (1)China (18)Christianity (15)Civility (32)Colonialism (1)Copyright (11)Corruption (2)Defamation (26)Democracy (27)Denialism (4)Denmark (2)Discrimination (6)Education (19)Egypt (5)Europe (2)Exclusion (1)Facebook (7)Film (1)Finland (1)France (5)Freedom (36)Genocide (2)Germany (9)Google (4)Governance (13)Hate speech (18)Hinduism (1)History (17)Homosexuality (4)Humour (3)Hungary (1)Hunger strike (1)India (10)Internet (46)Internet companies (1)Iran (1)Islam (20)Italy (1)Japan (2)Journalism (27)Kenya (2)Knowledge (26)Language (9)Latin America (5)Law (47)Lese majesty (1)Liberalism (11)Literature (2)Media (42)Memory laws (1)Middle East (9)Minorities (2)Money (18)Morality (8)Multiculturalism (6)National security (38)Net neutrality (16)Netherlands (3)Nudity (4)Occupy movement (1)Open source (2)Pakistan (3)Philippines (1)Piracy (3)Poland (1)Politics (58)Pornography (8)Power (49)Privacy (20)Protest (21)Public Morality (23)Radio (1)Regulation (4)Religion (29)Reputation (16)Right to information (45)Russia (2)Satire (13)Saudi Arabia (1)Science (10)Scientology (1)Secrecy (1)Singapore (2)Social media (13)South Africa (4)Southeast Asia (3)Sport (2)Surveillance (4)Syria (2)Technology (19)Terrorism (5)Thailand (1)Turkey (4)Twitter (10)United Kingdom (14)United States (16)Violence (26)Whistleblowing (3)Wikileaks (2)Wikipedia (3)Yemen (1)YouTube (1) Glasnost! Nine ways Facebook can make itself a better forum for free speech and democracy Free Speech Debate co-authors an Oxford-Stanford report on Facebook. Ben Wizner, Edward Snowden’s lawyer: To what extent should government be allowed to curtail civil liberties for the sake of national security? Ben Wizner, Edward Snowden’s ACLU lawyer, reflects on the state of and importance of the right to free speech in 2017. He argues we must not overuse the term ‘national security’ or surrender our right to privacy because we have nothing to hide, for we would not deny somebody the right to free speech because they had nothing to say. 5 podcasts and our 10 principles on the BBC Timothy Garton Ash introduces his BBC broadcasts and online version of the Free Speech Debate principles. Evgeny Morozov on the dark side of internet freedom Evgeny Morozov highlights the dangers that can emerge when governments and corporations harness the internet to serve their own objectives. Policing the internet for extremist material Josh Cowls discusses the Oxford Internet Institute’s report on the complexities of balancing security and privacy online. Luciano Floridi: What contribution can the philosophy of information make to our understanding of free speech? Luciano Floridi, Professor at the Oxford Internet Institute of the University of Oxford, speaks to Free Speech Debate about the philosophy of information, European data protection, and contemporary challenges to free speech. What happened to ‘the right to be forgotten’? Free Speech Debate tells the story of the advisory council to Google on the right to be forgotten, and talks to council member Luciano Floridi. Should ‘revenge porn’ be illegal? Max Harris explains how Britain legislated against it and compares this with the position in other common law countries John Naughton: Are private superpowers a threat to free speech? John Naughton discusses the state of the internet, net neutrality and private companies. Has Demotix democratised journalism? Demotix founder Turi Munthe discusses the role of citizen journalism and Demotix in today’s media environment. Google grapples with the ‘right to be forgotten’ Katie Engelhart attends the public hearing of Google’s Advisory Council, set up in response to a European Court of Justice judgement. National Security: Sample our intellectual buffet. Or make your own meal. Timothy Garton Ash introduces a sample tour of the content on our site. Privacy: Sample our intellectual buffet. Or make your own meal. Timothy Garton Ash introduces a sample tour of the content on our site National security and privacy: striking the balance Anthony Lester and Zoe McCallum discuss the need to balance national security and privacy in the age of internet surveillance. Germans are not especially concerned about privacy and sovereignty Nazi past? Stasi past? Sebastian Huempfer challenges the conventional explanations for Germany’s strong reaction to Edward Snowden’s revelations about NSA snooping. Internet access in the age of the surveillance state Oxford University’s Ian Brown asks what Europe can do to protect our digital rights and privacy. Is Facebook just the new chamber of commerce and Twitter the new telegraph? Political theorist Rob Reich discusses what adaptations we need as freedom of speech and association move increasingly from the offline to the online world. Can the old principles still apply in new circumstances? Does India need its Leveson? India has its own fierce debate about media regulation. Arghya Sengupta discusses how the shadow of the 1970s “Emergency” hangs over proposed steps from failed self-regulation to statutory regulation. Is privacy getting lost in Google’s “cracks and crevices”? A globally-effective privacy regime is a realistic goal, argues Ian Brown. But it needs giants like Google to get behind it. A right to privacy? Not at the expense of free speech! Our user imos.org.uk argues with one of our draft principles challenging the idea that privacy is a condition for free speech. Who should guard the Guardian? Alan Rusbridger, editor-in-chief of the Guardian, argues that Britain needs both a free press and reform of its failed regulatory system. Since this will require both time and openness, a new independent press regulator should therefore be given a year’s trial run. 不准询问也不准告知 David Erdos写道，在在欧盟范围内触及每个人生活的数据保护法即将修订。这些法律提案过于严苛：是时候为那些研究人员的利益摇旗呐喊了。 中国的公共言论哲学：没有足够的理论？ 中国政府对言论自由的态度源于一种复杂而富有智慧的哲学。Rogier Creemers试图厘清其中的缘由。 导致自杀的网络欺凌 加拿大少年Amanda Todd在遭受了多年的网络欺凌和骚扰后于2012年10月10日自杀身亡。 Judith Bruhn讲述了这个令人震惊的案例。 倾颓的第四根柱子 在新的资本主义压力下，印度媒体正处于丧失自身道德标杆的危险境地下。现在我们应当通过抵制来阻止情况的恶化，Manav Bhushan如是说。 在菲律宾，小心您转发的内容 Purple S. Romero写道，菲律宾新出台的网络犯罪法将给予政府不受限制的权力监控互联网用户，关闭网站并监禁公民。 The Nira Radia tapes controversy and the right to privacy Should government-initiated phone hacking be made public if the recordings are in the public interest? Shubhangi Bhadada exposes the thin line in India between the right to privacy and freedom of expression. The future of free speech Human Rights activist Aryeh Neier speaks about the future of free speech. 一个凶手是否应该有被遗忘的权利？ 在2008年，两名被定罪的的杀人犯按照德国法律要求维基百科和其他网络媒体从互联网上删除他们的名字及记录。在本例中,被人遗忘的权利是否比公众的知情权更重要? 脸书标签热 脸书是否该自动提示照片中的人呢？ Sabastian Huempfer写到，脸书的相片标签软件是否侵犯了使用的者隐私。 Ahmed Mansoor on blogging his way into a UAE prison One of the United Arab Emirate’s most prominent human rights activists, Ahmed Mansoor was imprisoned in 2011 for criticising the country’s leadership. Here he discusses the death threats, defamation campaigns and physical attacks he continues to face for speaking his mind. 袒露上身的公爵夫人 Judith Bruhn和大家一起研究欧洲的私隐权和法院强制令是否足以挽救剑桥公爵夫人的私隐。 Amelia Andersdotter: Why the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement is dangerous The Swedish Pirate Party’s outspoken MEP explains why the European Parliament overwhelmingly rejected the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement in July and discusses WCIT, the internet’s next four-letter foe. Evgeny Morozov: What is the dark side of internet freedom? Author Evgeny Morozov highlights the dangers that sometimes emerge when governments and corporations harness the internet to serve their own objectives. David Kirkpatrick: What is the Facebook Effect? The author of The Facebook Effect talks to FSD about privacy, anonymity whether the social network plans to go into China. What not to wear Maryam Omidi takes a look at banned clothing around the world – and concludes that women tend to be the target of dogmatic dress codes. 伊朗女星的性爱录像带丑闻 在伊朗，一份被泄露的性爱视频迫使伊朗女星扎赫拉·阿米尔·埃布拉希米逃往国外，以避免被起诉。撰文：Fatemeh Shams Esmaeili。 Judge grills mogul: the uses of transparency The public nature of the Leveson Inquiry into the phone-hacking scandal has been exemplary, writes Timothy Garton Ash. The tension between data protection and freedom of expression EU member states should reform the data protection framework to address the realities of life in the Web 2.0 age, writes David Erdos ACTA & the internet: freedom of expression & privacy Join Free Speech Debate and ARTICLE 19 in London on Thursday 3 May for a panel discussion on the impact of ACTA on global free expression Journalists do not have a divine right to invade privacy Leading free speech expert Eric Barendt defends a British parliamentary report on privacy against criticisms by campaigning journalist John Kampfner. 基督徒在工作时能否佩戴十字架 Dominic Burbridge写到，两名基督教妇女把在工作场所佩戴十字架的斗争打到了欧洲人权法院。 Facebook、隐私和你 Facebook的Lord Allan和作家Viktor Mayer Schonberger就该社交网的实名制、信息透明和对和利用个人信息等问题进行辩论。 Patriot Act and FISA without end? How the Obama administration continues use of Bush-era powers to suppress legitimate debate about the needs of US national security. By Jeff Howard. On Free Speech: China, India and the art of ‘Zuckering’ The second episode of FSD’s monthly podcast looks at free speech in India, internet censorship in China and Facebook’s attitude towards privacy. 在中东地区（不）报道同性恋 Brian Pellot写到，中东地区的媒体不报道男同性恋问题，就像他们同样地对待其他新闻一样。 Facebook, privacy and you Is the age of privacy over? Lord (Richard) Allan from Facebook and Viktor Mayer-Schönberger, author of Delete, go head to head on privacy and the right to be forgotten in the internet era. Tim Wu: Would the right to be forgotten hinder entrepreneurialism? Tim Wu, the author of ‘The Master Switch’, says that while the right to be forgotten is a good idea in theory but wouldn’t work in practice. 名人隐私登记册 大法官莱维森建议采用名人隐私登记册，使名人可以选择避开媒体的聚光灯。杂志编辑们对此意见不一。Sebastian Huempfer讨论了这个问题。 谷歌街景在德国 2011年柏林一家法庭宣判谷歌街景没有违法。作出这个判决是因为有公民控告谷歌，指出谷歌街景侵犯了其财产和隐私权。Sebastian Huempfer回顾了这个案例。 Is online deletion a virtue or a form of denialism? The first of Free Speech Debate’s monthly podcasts, featuring selected highlights from the site. 德国的答辩权 德国公民享有法定权利可以在媒体上进行答辩。Maximilian Ruhenstroth-Bauer解释说，无需去法院就可以找到一条维护名誉的途径。 马科斯·莫斯利谈隐私问题 这位国际汽联前主席区分了隐私与名誉的不同，并且指出对抗国际小报的肆意爆料炒作是十分困难的。 什么是“隐私”？ 所有文化中都有“隐私”的概念，但是其含义因时因地而不同。 多米尼克·斯特劳斯-卡恩的“游街示众” 当国际货币基金组织前总裁多米尼克·斯特劳斯-卡恩被控以性侵犯纽约一家酒店的女服务员后，让他游街示众是正确的做法吗？Clementine de Montjoye认为不是。 言论自由与隐私权 伦敦大学学院教授Eric Barendt讨论了言论自由和隐私权之间的微妙平衡。 银行经理与超级禁制令 皇家苏格兰银行前首席执行官弗里德·古德温爵士（Sir Fred Goodwin）因被曝在银行行将倒闭之时还在搞婚外恋而受到公众质疑。Maryam Omidi分析了这段婚外情到底涉不涉及公共利益。
Glasnost! Nine ways Facebook can make itself a better forum for free speech and democracy Free Speech Debate co-authors an Oxford-Stanford report on Facebook.
Ben Wizner, Edward Snowden’s lawyer: To what extent should government be allowed to curtail civil liberties for the sake of national security? Ben Wizner, Edward Snowden’s ACLU lawyer, reflects on the state of and importance of the right to free speech in 2017. He argues we must not overuse the term ‘national security’ or surrender our right to privacy because we have nothing to hide, for we would not deny somebody the right to free speech because they had nothing to say.
5 podcasts and our 10 principles on the BBC Timothy Garton Ash introduces his BBC broadcasts and online version of the Free Speech Debate principles.
Evgeny Morozov on the dark side of internet freedom Evgeny Morozov highlights the dangers that can emerge when governments and corporations harness the internet to serve their own objectives.
Policing the internet for extremist material Josh Cowls discusses the Oxford Internet Institute’s report on the complexities of balancing security and privacy online.
Luciano Floridi: What contribution can the philosophy of information make to our understanding of free speech? Luciano Floridi, Professor at the Oxford Internet Institute of the University of Oxford, speaks to Free Speech Debate about the philosophy of information, European data protection, and contemporary challenges to free speech.
What happened to ‘the right to be forgotten’? Free Speech Debate tells the story of the advisory council to Google on the right to be forgotten, and talks to council member Luciano Floridi.
Should ‘revenge porn’ be illegal? Max Harris explains how Britain legislated against it and compares this with the position in other common law countries
John Naughton: Are private superpowers a threat to free speech? John Naughton discusses the state of the internet, net neutrality and private companies.
Has Demotix democratised journalism? Demotix founder Turi Munthe discusses the role of citizen journalism and Demotix in today’s media environment.
Google grapples with the ‘right to be forgotten’ Katie Engelhart attends the public hearing of Google’s Advisory Council, set up in response to a European Court of Justice judgement.
National Security: Sample our intellectual buffet. Or make your own meal. Timothy Garton Ash introduces a sample tour of the content on our site.
Privacy: Sample our intellectual buffet. Or make your own meal. Timothy Garton Ash introduces a sample tour of the content on our site
National security and privacy: striking the balance Anthony Lester and Zoe McCallum discuss the need to balance national security and privacy in the age of internet surveillance.
Germans are not especially concerned about privacy and sovereignty Nazi past? Stasi past? Sebastian Huempfer challenges the conventional explanations for Germany’s strong reaction to Edward Snowden’s revelations about NSA snooping.
Internet access in the age of the surveillance state Oxford University’s Ian Brown asks what Europe can do to protect our digital rights and privacy.
Is Facebook just the new chamber of commerce and Twitter the new telegraph? Political theorist Rob Reich discusses what adaptations we need as freedom of speech and association move increasingly from the offline to the online world. Can the old principles still apply in new circumstances?
Does India need its Leveson? India has its own fierce debate about media regulation. Arghya Sengupta discusses how the shadow of the 1970s “Emergency” hangs over proposed steps from failed self-regulation to statutory regulation.
Is privacy getting lost in Google’s “cracks and crevices”? A globally-effective privacy regime is a realistic goal, argues Ian Brown. But it needs giants like Google to get behind it.
A right to privacy? Not at the expense of free speech! Our user imos.org.uk argues with one of our draft principles challenging the idea that privacy is a condition for free speech.
Who should guard the Guardian? Alan Rusbridger, editor-in-chief of the Guardian, argues that Britain needs both a free press and reform of its failed regulatory system. Since this will require both time and openness, a new independent press regulator should therefore be given a year’s trial run.
The Nira Radia tapes controversy and the right to privacy Should government-initiated phone hacking be made public if the recordings are in the public interest? Shubhangi Bhadada exposes the thin line in India between the right to privacy and freedom of expression.
Ahmed Mansoor on blogging his way into a UAE prison One of the United Arab Emirate’s most prominent human rights activists, Ahmed Mansoor was imprisoned in 2011 for criticising the country’s leadership. Here he discusses the death threats, defamation campaigns and physical attacks he continues to face for speaking his mind.
Amelia Andersdotter: Why the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement is dangerous The Swedish Pirate Party’s outspoken MEP explains why the European Parliament overwhelmingly rejected the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement in July and discusses WCIT, the internet’s next four-letter foe.
Evgeny Morozov: What is the dark side of internet freedom? Author Evgeny Morozov highlights the dangers that sometimes emerge when governments and corporations harness the internet to serve their own objectives.
David Kirkpatrick: What is the Facebook Effect? The author of The Facebook Effect talks to FSD about privacy, anonymity whether the social network plans to go into China.
What not to wear Maryam Omidi takes a look at banned clothing around the world – and concludes that women tend to be the target of dogmatic dress codes.
Judge grills mogul: the uses of transparency The public nature of the Leveson Inquiry into the phone-hacking scandal has been exemplary, writes Timothy Garton Ash.
The tension between data protection and freedom of expression EU member states should reform the data protection framework to address the realities of life in the Web 2.0 age, writes David Erdos
ACTA & the internet: freedom of expression & privacy Join Free Speech Debate and ARTICLE 19 in London on Thursday 3 May for a panel discussion on the impact of ACTA on global free expression
Journalists do not have a divine right to invade privacy Leading free speech expert Eric Barendt defends a British parliamentary report on privacy against criticisms by campaigning journalist John Kampfner.
Patriot Act and FISA without end? How the Obama administration continues use of Bush-era powers to suppress legitimate debate about the needs of US national security. By Jeff Howard.
On Free Speech: China, India and the art of ‘Zuckering’ The second episode of FSD’s monthly podcast looks at free speech in India, internet censorship in China and Facebook’s attitude towards privacy.
Facebook, privacy and you Is the age of privacy over? Lord (Richard) Allan from Facebook and Viktor Mayer-Schönberger, author of Delete, go head to head on privacy and the right to be forgotten in the internet era.
Tim Wu: Would the right to be forgotten hinder entrepreneurialism? Tim Wu, the author of ‘The Master Switch’, says that while the right to be forgotten is a good idea in theory but wouldn’t work in practice.
Is online deletion a virtue or a form of denialism? The first of Free Speech Debate’s monthly podcasts, featuring selected highlights from the site.
多米尼克·斯特劳斯-卡恩的“游街示众” 当国际货币基金组织前总裁多米尼克·斯特劳斯-卡恩被控以性侵犯纽约一家酒店的女服务员后，让他游街示众是正确的做法吗？Clementine de Montjoye认为不是。
银行经理与超级禁制令 皇家苏格兰银行前首席执行官弗里德·古德温爵士（Sir Fred Goodwin）因被曝在银行行将倒闭之时还在搞婚外恋而受到公众质疑。Maryam Omidi分析了这段婚外情到底涉不涉及公共利益。
