德国绿党的联合主席向言论自由大讨论表示，纳粹意识形态不应该被禁止，应该以一种更民主的方法与之对抗。
In this interview with Free Speech Debate, Claudia Roth, co-chair of the German Green Party, says that government encroachments into the internet often go too far and display a lack of understanding about how the technology works. On privacy, which is deeply embedded in German law, she expects “informational self-determination” even on the internet. “Freedom is important but the freedom to have one’s data protected is equally important,” she says. The second half of the interview focuses on Holocaust denial, which is criminalised in Germany. Roth concedes that criminalisation is not an effective way of eradicating fascist ideologies: “You can’t ban thoughts. Rather, one has to confront them in a democratic way.”
reply report Report comment
To make this more like a real case study, I’d like to introduce you to the case of Marcel Woell in 2008. As a councillor in a small German town, Woell recommended in council that the town should no longer pay for pupil’s tours to “places of so called national socialist terror” (namely, Auschwitz or Treblinka) . For this use of “so called” he was comdemned to four months in prison.
Rightly or wrongly?
reply report Report comment
After I read the Interview, I think that Ms. Roth said in no way that she wants more freedom, only that suppression isn’t sufficient to eradicate Holocaust denial etc.
You might conclude that, in order to “eradicate” such ideas effectively, you need debates, and debate requires free speech – but Ms. Roth doesn’t think so far.
reply report Report comment
I’m completely perplexed as I’ve never read in German media that Ms. Roth thinks something like that.
By the way, § 130 StGB doesn’t only punish Holocaust denial, but has been extended about every five years and comprehends today also Holocaust doubt, Holocaust downplaying (meaning Pro-Lifers or Animal Protectors who compare abortion or slaughtering to the Holocaust) and a lot of other things.