按投稿人查看 'HARRIS Max' 作者 7 发布内容 menu按关键词查找 Academia (2)Access (20)Africa (6)Anonymity (10)Antisemitism (1)Arab Spring (5)Art (13)Article 19 (2)Atheism (2)Australia (2)Blasphemy (16)Blogger (6)Books (1)Brazil (3)Buddhism (1)Burma (1)Canada (3)Celebrity (5)Censorship (36)Charlie Hebdo (2)Child abuse (1)China (18)Christianity (15)Civility (32)Colonialism (1)Copyright (11)Corruption (2)Defamation (26)Democracy (27)Denialism (4)Denmark (2)Discrimination (6)Education (19)Egypt (5)Europe (2)Exclusion (1)Facebook (7)Film (1)Finland (1)France (5)Freedom (36)Genocide (2)Germany (9)Google (4)Governance (13)Hate speech (18)Hinduism (1)History (17)Homosexuality (4)Humour (3)Hungary (1)Hunger strike (1)India (10)Internet (46)Internet companies (1)Iran (1)Islam (20)Italy (1)Japan (2)Journalism (27)Kenya (2)Knowledge (26)Language (9)Latin America (5)Law (47)Lese majesty (1)Liberalism (11)Literature (2)Media (42)Memory laws (1)Middle East (9)Minorities (2)Money (18)Morality (8)Multiculturalism (6)National security (38)Net neutrality (16)Netherlands (3)Nudity (4)Occupy movement (1)Open source (2)Pakistan (3)Philippines (1)Piracy (3)Poland (1)Politics (58)Pornography (8)Power (49)Privacy (20)Protest (21)Public Morality (23)Radio (1)Regulation (4)Religion (29)Reputation (16)Right to information (45)Russia (2)Satire (13)Saudi Arabia (1)Science (10)Scientology (1)Secrecy (1)Singapore (2)Social media (13)South Africa (4)Southeast Asia (3)Sport (2)Surveillance (4)Syria (2)Technology (19)Terrorism (5)Thailand (1)Turkey (4)Twitter (10)United Kingdom (14)United States (16)Violence (26)Whistleblowing (3)Wikileaks (2)Wikipedia (3)Yemen (1)YouTube (1) Citizens United: how the US Supreme Court struck down limits on corporate electioneering on the grounds of free speech Max Harris analyses the case and the applicability of US First Amendment rights to corporations. Law restricting online speech struck down in India Max Harris examines a historic judgment by India’s Supreme Court and its lessons for other countries. Should ‘revenge porn’ be illegal? Max Harris explains how Britain legislated against it and compares this with the position in other common law countries US Supreme Court strikes down law creating ‘buffer zone’ around abortion clinics In the case of McCullen v Coakley, the US Supreme Court issued a landmark ruling about restrictions on speech around abortion clinics. Max Harris explains. A landmark Canadian hate speech case: Her Majesty the Queen v Keegstra In 1990, the Supreme Court of Canada issued a famous ruling in a case involving a high school teacher and alleged anti-Semitism. Max Harris explains. 荷兰一名14岁少年因推特恶作剧被捕 Max Harris和我们讨论了一名14岁的荷兰女孩在推特上的恶作剧如何造成她本人被捕，又如何引发关于言论自由的更大争议。 Eatock v Bolt: a controversial Australian hate speech case Max Harris explains why journalist Andrew Bolt was found in breach of Australia’s Racial Discrimination Act for articles about “fair-skinned Aboriginal people”.
Citizens United: how the US Supreme Court struck down limits on corporate electioneering on the grounds of free speech Max Harris analyses the case and the applicability of US First Amendment rights to corporations.
Law restricting online speech struck down in India Max Harris examines a historic judgment by India’s Supreme Court and its lessons for other countries.
Should ‘revenge porn’ be illegal? Max Harris explains how Britain legislated against it and compares this with the position in other common law countries
US Supreme Court strikes down law creating ‘buffer zone’ around abortion clinics In the case of McCullen v Coakley, the US Supreme Court issued a landmark ruling about restrictions on speech around abortion clinics. Max Harris explains.
A landmark Canadian hate speech case: Her Majesty the Queen v Keegstra In 1990, the Supreme Court of Canada issued a famous ruling in a case involving a high school teacher and alleged anti-Semitism. Max Harris explains.
Eatock v Bolt: a controversial Australian hate speech case Max Harris explains why journalist Andrew Bolt was found in breach of Australia’s Racial Discrimination Act for articles about “fair-skinned Aboriginal people”.
