了日本一款涉及强奸妇女的电脑游戏在问世三年后才在国际社会的强烈抗议中被禁售。
案例详情
2006年，日本公司Illusion Soft发布了视频游戏《电车之狼》（RapeLay）。游戏的目标就是多次强奸一名母亲和她两个年幼的女儿，如果他们怀孕，就强迫他们做人工流产。虽然游戏只在日本国内发布，但它透过互联网迅速蔓延全球。
2009年，美国女权组织“立即平等”（Equality Now）展开游说，要求禁售这款游戏，英国和澳大利亚等国的一些妇女权利团体也支持“立即平等”的行动。媒体随后对游戏做了报道，谴责了游戏中展示的针对妇女的的暴力。直到游戏发布3年后，日本国内的团体和媒体才开始响应国际媒体的关注，游说禁售《电车之狼》。日本零售商自愿停止出售这款游戏，随后，日本独立的成人游戏分级机构“电脑软件伦理机构”，下令禁止出售一切带有性暴力的电脑游戏。
reply report Report comment
The game should not have been published initially. RapeLay is discriminating towards women as it creates the interpretation that woman are a source of sexual entertainment. The game also establishes an attitude that raping women and forcing them to abort is tolerable. In real life, by committing such felony, one could be facing a sentence that could last from 20 years to a lifetime, however in the game, the protagonist committing the criminal offence does not receive any retribution. Having said that, if a game such as this one has been published, the government should take action and distinctly ban it. The manner in which this game is portraying abortion is highly disturbing as it comes across as entertainment to users. By allowing RapeLay to be played, a message to the future generations is being sent saying that violating women rights such as sexual abuse to be respectable.
reply report Report comment
That’s the most absurd and immoral game I have never heard before. It clearly induce people to do such crime. In our age, especially for children really affecting by video games. Therefore, video games which include violence and sexual immoral behaviours should be banned immediately. That’s no funny or entertainment this kind of games. It directly influence society as a harm way.
reply report Report comment
Author opinion is understandable if he has same opinion on virtual murder/war games. I personally believe no modern country should ban rape/murder/war games, or whatever most sickening games for you. Because most people can distinguish virtual world from real world. If some people cannot, it is problem of their mental health, not of games.
reply report Report comment
As a grown human being, it is really embarassing that most if not all the entertaining stuffs include some sort of violence. I am not saying that having some level of violence for bigger desire to enjoy such platform is bad but I am appalled by the fact that few game developers out there try to make games that express positive ideas rather than beating, shooting or killing. Furthermore, there are clear cases that these games become models of copycat crimes. I strongly think we should regulate such games like this.
reply report Report comment
Edino prav je, da so igro prepovedali! Kako se lahko sploh kdo spomni, da bi ustvaril igro, katere cilj je posiljevanje žensk?!
reply report Report comment
In this case, the game itself is encouraging the violation of basic human rights and dehumanizing two groups of people: women and children. I believe strongly in free speech and freedom of expression, but this game goes beyond those freedoms. It was designed for a specific population and it’s content promulgates hatred and violence toward a specific group.
reply report Report comment
There is not the kind of appropriate game for anybody, doesn’t matter how old is the people that is playing that .Games are supposed to be fun and make you feel good to be playing , they are not supposed to be like that .
reply report Report comment
A law would definitely have some negative outcomes and mixups, banning games that might be appropriate. This game particularly is gross to me. It should have never been created in the first place; what is stopping a disturbed teenager from trying to explore the reality instead of playing just a virtual representation of such a horrible act?
reply report Report comment
What’s to stop a disturbed teenager from trying to explore the reality of murder instead of playing just a virtual representation of such a horrible act?
reply report Report comment
I agree with the author’s comment that the game should never have been produced. Rape can never be considered a game because of its violence. I think a legal ban is entirely appopriate.
reply report Report comment
Censorship by the government is prohibited by the Constitution.
I don’t think a legal ban is better than regulation of the civil committee.