تبصرے (6)

گوگل کے ترجمے آٹومیٹک مشین ترجمے فراہم نہیں کرتے. ان سے آپ کو کہنے والے کی بات کا لب لباب تو پتا لگ سکتا ہے لیکن یہ آپ کو بات کا بلکل درست ترجمہ بشمول اس کی پیچیدگیوں کے نہیں دے سکتا.ان ترجموں کو پڑھتے وقت آپ یہ بات ضرور ذہن میں رکھیے

1. zerolf مئی 30, 2012 وقت 10:14 شام
   replyجواب دینے کے لیے لاگ ان کریں report Report comment

   This is yet another example of Larry Page quote “Government is the biggest threat to internet”.
2. ivonavolimarka مئی 28, 2012 وقت 11:02 شام
   replyجواب دینے کے لیے لاگ ان کریں report Report comment

   Iako je cilj ispravan,sredstvo nije. Svakim ukidanjem i zbranom se postize samo kontra-efekat. Nijedan vid konzervatimizna i diktature nije dobrodosao u 21. veku. Uzgred,onaj ko zeli da se ogresi o veru ili drzavu nacice nacin da to i ucini.
3. layssapr مئی 24, 2012 وقت 4:13 صبح
   replyجواب دینے کے لیے لاگ ان کریں report Report comment

   Turkey is a country that follows a strict censorship against any insult toward turkishness or political extremism.Precedence over domestic law,such as censorship,is led by domestic and international legislation.There were great number of reports of human rights problems and abuses in Turkey.The overly close relationship between judges and prosecutor became a probleme to get fair trials.The government limited freedom of expression and freedom declined during the year.The concern then is not the Youtube,which is a big source of informantion,and indeed the government that has to make up inside first,to be well viewed outsite.Banning Youtube is not a solution.
4. lesa مئی 22, 2012 وقت 2:23 صبح
   replyجواب دینے کے لیے لاگ ان کریں report Report comment

   I can understand the traditional values that Turkish government is trying to protect, as I come from a country that is not ‘westernized’ yet, and I would never want someone to desecrate my history and my values. But on the other hand, one should be ready to stand up and respond to those provocations in a way that does not automatically exclude the entire country from youtube. An individual should be able to decide whether he or she would want to continue using the website or not.
5. elebasi فروری 25, 2012 وقت 8:05 شام
   replyجواب دینے کے لیے لاگ ان کریں report Report comment

   I think this banning policy of countries will be a big barrier for free speech in the future. There is no world-wide law that can compensate for filtering context in a web page. This situation will be perceived as a national security matter which will result in a very profitable business model for the tech companies which already provides main internet infrastructure.
6. brianpellot فروری 23, 2012 وقت 10:18 شام
   replyجواب دینے کے لیے لاگ ان کریں report Report comment

   Filtering contentious videos on YT rather than YT as a whole is certainly possible, but this requires more sophisticated and expensive technology. They seem to have taken the cheap and easy way out in 2007.