07Gizlilik Hakkı

Gizliliğimizi koruyabilmeli ve itibarımızı zedeleyecek iftiralara karşı çıkabilmeliyiz, fakat kamu yararı için özel hayatımızın incelenmesine de engel olmamalıyız.

Academia (2)
Access (17)
Africa (6)
Animal Rights (1)
Anonymity (9)
Arab Spring (5)
Art (15)
Article 19 (1)
Atheism (1)
Australia (4)
Blasphemy (16)
Blogger (5)
Books (1)
Brazil (4)
Buddhism (2)
Burma (2)
Canada (3)
Celebrity (5)
Censorship (28)
Charlie Hebdo (2)
China (10)
Christianity (13)
Civility (33)
Colonialism (1)
Copyright (7)
Corruption (3)
Defamation (24)
Democracy (20)
Denialism (3)
Denmark (2)
Discrimination (9)
Education (16)
Egypt (3)
Europe (4)
Exclusion (1)
Facebook (3)
Film (1)
France (6)
Freedom (36)
Gaza conflict (1)
Genocide (3)
Germany (9)
Google (5)
Governance (10)
Hate speech (19)
Hinduism (1)
History (18)
Homosexuality (5)
Humour (3)
Hungary (1)
Hunger strike (1)
India (11)
Internet (43)
Internet companies (1)
Islam (21)
Israel (1)
Japan (2)
Journalism (24)
Kenya (2)
Knowledge (26)
Language (10)
Latin America (6)
Law (51)
Lese majesty (1)
Liberalism (13)
Literature (6)
Media (47)
Memory laws (2)
Middle East (8)
Minorities (4)
Money (13)
Morality (8)
Multiculturalism (10)
National security (30)
Net neutrality (12)
Netherlands (3)
New Zealand (1)
Norway (1)
Nudity (5)
Occupy movement (1)
Open source (2)
Pakistan (4)
Palestine (1)
Piracy (2)
Poland (3)
Politics (54)
Pornography (9)
Power (56)
Privacy (22)
Protest (23)
Public Morality (27)
Race (1)
Radio (2)
Regulation (5)
Religion (32)
Reputation (19)
Right to information (47)
Russia (2)
Satire (13)
Saudi Arabia (1)
Science (8)
Scientology (1)
Secrecy (1)
Singapore (2)
Social media (15)
South Africa (5)
Southeast Asia (2)
Sport (1)
Surveillance (2)
Syria (1)
Technology (20)
Terrorism (6)
Thailand (1)
Turkey (11)
Twitter (8)
Ukraine (1)
United Kingdom (11)
United States (16)
Violence (28)
Whistleblowing (3)
Wikileaks (1)
Wikipedia (2)
YouTube (1)

			
					“Monopoly is really dangerous for free speech”
				
Ana Kasparian of #yourMSC asks our director Timothy Garton Ash about Facebook, free speech and democracy at the Munich Security Conference 2019.

					Glasnost! Nine ways Facebook can make itself a better forum for free speech and democracy
				
Free Speech Debate co-authors an Oxford-Stanford report on Facebook.

					In defence of Europe’s memory laws
				
There are two exceptional cases in which memory laws protect free speech, argue Grażyna Baranowska and Anna Wójcik.

					Is there a universal right to free speech and what are its limits?
				
Timothy Garton Ash in conversation with Nigel Warburton, as part of the Philosophy in the Bookshop series at Blackwell’s, Oxford.

					Silencing 140 characters: free expression and the internet in the Gulf
				
A seminar run by the University of Oxford’s Middle East Centre and Free Speech Debate on Free Expression in the Gulf, with Maryam al-Khawaja (Gulf Centre for Human Rights), Toby Matthieson (St. Anthony’s College) and Nicholas McGeehan (Middle East Researcher, Human Rights Watch). Chaired by Timothy Garton Ash

					Ben Wizner, Edward Snowden’s lawyer: To what extent should government be allowed to curtail civil liberties for the sake of national security?
				
Ben Wizner, Edward Snowden’s ACLU lawyer, reflects on the state of and importance of the right to free speech in 2017. He argues we must not overuse the term ‘national security’ or surrender our right to privacy because we have nothing to hide, for we would not deny somebody the right to free speech because they had nothing to say.

					An introductory guide to the ten principles
				
Our social media team have created a new way to explore the 10 principles on Youtube.

					Luciano Floridi: What contribution can the philosophy of information make to our understanding of free speech?
				
Luciano Floridi, Professor at the Oxford Internet Institute of the University of Oxford, speaks to Free Speech Debate about the philosophy of information, European data protection, and contemporary challenges to free speech.

					What happened to ‘the right to be forgotten’?
				
Free Speech Debate tells the story of the advisory council to Google on the right to be forgotten, and talks to council member Luciano Floridi.

					İtibar
				
Gizliliğimizi koruyabilmeli ve itibarımızı zedeleyecek iftiralara karşı çıkabilmeliyiz, fakat kamu yararı için özel hayatımızın incelenmesine de engel olmamalıyız.

					Gizlilik Hakkı
				
Gizliliğimizi koruyabilmeli ve itibarımızı zedeleyecek iftiralara karşı çıkabilmeliyiz, fakat kamu yararı için özel hayatımızın incelenmesine de engel olmamalıyız.

					‘İntikam Pornosu’ yasaklanmalı mı?
				
Max Harris İngiltere’nin intikam pornosuna yönelik nasıl yasal düzenlemeler yaptığını diğer Milletler Topluluğu ülkeleri ile karşılaştırarak açıklıyor.

					What is it like to be a satirical cartoonist in Malaysia?
				
Malaysian cartoonist Zunar talks about what it means to be a satirical cartoonist in Malaysia.

					Google grapples with the ‘right to be forgotten’
				
Katie Engelhart attends the public hearing of Google’s Advisory Council, set up in response to a European Court of Justice judgement.

					Privacy: Sample our intellectual buffet. Or make your own meal.
				
Timothy Garton Ash introduces a sample tour of the content on our site

					A short history of disappearing privacy on Facebook
				
Since Facebook launched in 2005 its default privacy settings have undergone radical changes, giving more access to personal data than many are aware of. 

					US Supreme Court strikes down law creating ‘buffer zone’ around abortion clinics
				
In the case of McCullen v Coakley, the US Supreme Court issued a landmark ruling about restrictions on speech around abortion clinics.  Max Harris explains.

					How an attempt at ‘libel tourism’ rebounded on a Tanzanian tycoon
				
A British citizen blogged about a Tanzanian media magnate involved in throwing her and her husband off their Tanzanian farm. He sued for libel in a British court. Dominic Burbidge explains.

					National security and privacy: striking the balance
				
Anthony Lester and Zoe McCallum discuss the need to balance national security and privacy in the age of internet surveillance.

					Is it a crime to offend bread?
				
For one taxi company in the Russian town of Kostroma, the answer turned out to be yes. Sergey Fadeev explains.

					Can a law-abiding liberal democracy be Big Brother?
				
Jeff Howard explores the legal basis on which the US is collecting vast amounts of data on foreign and US citizens, despite the Fourth Amendment.

					Hindistan’ın Leveson’a ihtiyacı var mı?
				
Hindistan’ın kendi medya düzenlemesiyle ilgili ateşli bir tartışması var. Arghya Sengupta 1970lerin “Olağanüstü” hali, başarısız öz-düzenlemeden tutun da öz- düzenlemelere kadar önerilen adımları etkilemeye devam ediyor, diyor.

					When and where should extremists be allowed to march?
				
Protests held by far right groups in ethnically diverse areas are provocation, but banning them can have undesired effects. Josh Black looks at a ban on the English Defence League in East London.

					Is privacy getting lost in Google’s “cracks and crevices”?
				
A globally-effective privacy regime is a realistic goal, argues Ian Brown. But it needs giants like Google to get behind it.

					A right to privacy? Not at the expense of free speech!
				
Our user imos.org.uk argues with one of our draft principles challenging the idea that privacy is a condition for free speech.

					İntihara yol açan sanal zorbalik
				
Ekim 2012’de Amanda Todd adında Kanadalı bir genç seneler boyunca uğradığı sanal zorbalığa ve tacize dayanamayarak intihar etti. Judith Bruhn bu hayretler uyandırıcı olayı inceliyor.

					Hükümetiniz hakkında yalan söyleme hakkı mı?
				
1964 yılında, ABD Yüksek Mahkemesi hükümet yetkililerini eleştirenler hiçbir zaman cezalandırılmamalıdır fikrini kabul etti, ki bu durum eleştiriler tamamen yalan olsa da geçerli. Jeff Howard Birinci Anayasa Tadilatı için bir dönüm noktası olduğunu söylüyor.

					The Nira Radia tapes controversy and the right to privacy
				
Should government-initiated phone hacking be made public if the recordings are in the public interest? Shubhangi Bhadada exposes the thin line in India between the right to privacy and freedom of expression.

					Former British agent, Annie Machon: What is the case for whistleblowing?
				
Former British MI5 agent Annie Machon revealed,  together with David Shayler,  alleged criminal behaviour within the agency. In an interview with Sebastian Huempfer she speaks about the need for official channels through which whistleblowers can voice their concerns.

					Bir katilin unutulmaya hakkı var mı?
				
2008 yılında Almanya’da iki cinayet mahkumu isimlerinin Wikipedia ve diğer internet medya organlarından silinmesini istedi. Peki kişinin unutulma hakkı kamunun bilme hakkından önce mi gelir? 

					Facebook’un yüz tanıma özelliği ile otomatik etiketlemeye olan aşırı hevesi
				
Facebook otomatik olarak bir fotoğrafta kimin olduğunu önermeli midir? Sebastian Huempfer, Facebook’un fotoğrafları etiketleme yazılım programının kullanıcıların özel hayatlarının gizliliğini koruma hakkını ihlal edip etmediğini sorguluyor.

					Google’ın algoritması bir siyasetçinin eşine iftira atabilir mi?
				
Google’a eski Alman cumhurbaşkanının eşi “Bettine Wulff” ismini yazın, otomatik tamamlama özelliği ‘eskort’ kelimesini önerecektir. Bu algoritmik ekleme de bir hakaret sayılabilir mi? Sebastian Huempfer bu olayı inceliyor.

Ara

Hesabınız

Dil