Kategoriye göre sırala 'Hate speech' içeren 153 eklemeler

Academia (2)
Access (17)
Africa (6)
Animal Rights (1)
Anonymity (9)
Arab Spring (5)
Art (15)
Article 19 (1)
Atheism (1)
Australia (4)
Blasphemy (16)
Blogger (5)
Books (1)
Brazil (4)
Buddhism (2)
Burma (2)
Canada (3)
Celebrity (5)
Censorship (28)
Charlie Hebdo (2)
China (10)
Christianity (13)
Civility (33)
Colonialism (1)
Copyright (7)
Corruption (3)
Defamation (24)
Democracy (20)
Denialism (3)
Denmark (2)
Discrimination (9)
Education (16)
Egypt (3)
Europe (4)
Exclusion (1)
Facebook (3)
Film (1)
France (6)
Freedom (36)
Gaza conflict (1)
Genocide (3)
Germany (9)
Google (5)
Governance (10)
Hate speech (19)
Hinduism (1)
History (18)
Homosexuality (5)
Humour (3)
Hungary (1)
Hunger strike (1)
India (11)
Internet (43)
Internet companies (1)
Islam (21)
Israel (1)
Japan (2)
Journalism (24)
Kenya (2)
Knowledge (26)
Language (10)
Latin America (6)
Law (51)
Lese majesty (1)
Liberalism (13)
Literature (6)
Media (47)
Memory laws (2)
Middle East (8)
Minorities (4)
Money (13)
Morality (8)
Multiculturalism (10)
National security (30)
Net neutrality (12)
Netherlands (3)
New Zealand (1)
Norway (1)
Nudity (5)
Occupy movement (1)
Open source (2)
Pakistan (4)
Palestine (1)
Piracy (2)
Poland (3)
Politics (54)
Pornography (9)
Power (56)
Privacy (22)
Protest (23)
Public Morality (27)
Race (1)
Radio (2)
Regulation (5)
Religion (32)
Reputation (19)
Right to information (47)
Russia (2)
Satire (13)
Saudi Arabia (1)
Science (8)
Scientology (1)
Secrecy (1)
Singapore (2)
Social media (15)
South Africa (5)
Southeast Asia (2)
Sport (1)
Surveillance (2)
Syria (1)
Technology (20)
Terrorism (6)
Thailand (1)
Turkey (11)
Twitter (8)
Ukraine (1)
United Kingdom (11)
United States (16)
Violence (28)
Whistleblowing (3)
Wikileaks (1)
Wikipedia (2)
YouTube (1)

			
					Art with the ‘courage of thought’ is the best response to ‘hate speech’
				
Hungarian academic and performer Peter Molnar explains the importance of Gondolatbátorság to his ‘Hate Speech’ Monologues.

					The left’s version of hate speech: guilt by association
				
Leftists who argue for hate speech bans ignore the far left’s own version, argues Eric Heinze.

					An insistent effort by the Hrant Dink Foundation against hate speech in Turkey
				
Pınar Ensari and Funda Tekin explain the work of the Hrant Dink Foundation in countering hate speech in Turkey.

					An introductory guide to the ten principles
				
Our social media team have created a new way to explore the 10 principles on Youtube.

					From censorship by government to censorship by terrorism
				
Paul Cliteur and Tom Herrenberg, editors of a book on The Fall and Rise of Blasphemy Law, consider the changing nature of censorship.

					Is dangerous speech free speech?
				
Expression can be dangerous, but that should not necessarily make it a crime. Jeffrey Howard evaluates the best argument for banning hate speech. 

					The ‘lying press’ and the crisis of confidence in German media
				
Maja Sojref and Sarah Glatte explore the growing public disillusionment with the mainstream press in Germany.

					Why is Mein Kampf the 12th most sold history book on Amazon India?
				
Udit Bhatia discusses attitudes to, and ignorance of Hitler in India.

					When is speech dangerous?
				
Jonathan Leader Maynard examines the difficulties in assessing and managing the role of speech in violence.

					‘No-platforming’ on university campuses: political correctness and the subversion of free speech
				
Monica Richter argues that no-platforming is more about censoring unpalatable views than protecting marginalised groups.

					Don’t ban no-platforming
				
Sizwe Mpofu-Walsh argues that no-platforming is an expressive act that can expand the field of debate, rather than the denial of free speech.

					Ten arguments for – and against – ‘no-platforming’
				
Eric Heinze sets out the flaws in the commonly heard arguments for no-platforming.

					Why people shouldn’t feel the need to censor themselves
				
Roger Scruton argues that self-censorship can be as much a threat to free speech as its government equivalent.

					Why ‘no-platforming’ those who peddle hate speech does not pose a free speech issue
				
Purushottam Vikas engages with criticisms directed at a controversial petition regarding an Oxford India Society speaking event.

					Rae Langton: Why an understanding of silence is important to free speech debates
				
In this interview for Free Speech Debate, renowned Philosophy Professor Rae Langton speaks about the value of philosophy for our understanding of free speech and discusses aspects of her work on pornography and the silencing of women. 

					What is right speech and why is it important?
				
Leslie Green argues that Buddhist ideas  about avoiding divisive, abusive and  false speech can help us live together well in free societies

					Living in outrageous times
				
Peter Bradley argues that we should tolerate offence but be less offensive

					A landmark Canadian hate speech case: Her Majesty the Queen v Keegstra
				
In 1990, the Supreme Court of Canada issued a famous ruling in a case involving a high school teacher and alleged anti-Semitism.  Max Harris explains.

					EU versus intellectual freedom?
				
In a bid to synchronise hate crimes, the EU is seeking unity amongst members states against the denial of historical injustices. Is this the EU versus member states’ appreciation of intellectual freedom? Luigi Cajani explains.

					Eatock Bolt’a karşı: Avustralya’da tartışmalı bir nefret söylemi vakası
				
Max Harris, neden gazeteci Andrew Bolt’un “sarışın Aborjinli insanlar” makaleleri nedeniyle Avustralya Irk Ayrımcılığı Yasası’nı ihlal etmekle karşı karşıya kaldığını açıklıyor.

					Nineteen arguments for hate speech bans – and against them
				
Free speech scholar Eric Heinze identifies the main arguments for laws restricting hate speech and says none are valid for mature Western democracies.  

					Regulating hate speech: lessons for Asia
				
Cherian George on how hate speech is gaining virulence in Asian countries such as Myanmar, and how peace-building workshops represent a positive step forward.  

					From incitement to self-censorship: the media in the Kenyan elections of 2007 and 2013
				
Katherine Bruce-Lockhart looks at the media’s role in two Kenyan elections and argues that peace and critical media coverage should not be mutually exclusive. 

					‘They used the oven to get tanned, you know…’
				
Marc-Antoine Dilhac recounts how he confronted anti-semitic prejudice in a French classroom, and argues that more good  comes from an open debate about hate speech than from banning it. 

					Martha Nussbaum: How can we best approach the challenge of religious difference?
				
Legal philosopher Martha Nussbaum gave the 2013 Dahrendorf Lecture, exploring how to live with religious diversity.

					The difference between genocide and crimes against humanity
				
We regularly highlight comments that have made an impression on us. Antoon de Baets left an insightful response to Josie Appleton’s discussion of memory laws in France.

					Free Speech Bites
				
Nigel Warburton spoke with Timothy Garton Ash for Index on Censorship’s Free Speech Bites about the Free Speech Debate Project and global free speech standards.

					Nefret söylemi ne zaman tehlikeli hale gelir? Kenya ve Ruanda örnekleri
				
Katherine Bruce-Lockhart, Kenyalı yayıncı Joshua Arap Sang’ın yargılanacağı davanın sözcükler ve şiddet arasındaki bağa dair hayati sorular ortaya koyduğu görüşünde.

					Brigitte Bardot Müslümanlara karşı ırkçı nefreti kışkırtmaktan yine suçlu bulundu
				
Dünyaca ünlü bir oyuncu yabancıları ‘nüfus yoğunluğu’na yol açmakla suçlayabilir mi? Michèle Finck yazıyor.

					Taming the gods: How should we deal with religious threats to free speech?
				
At the 2013 Jaipur Festival, Ian Buruma, Reza Aslan, Ahdaf Souief and Timothy Garton Ash, in conversation with Shoma Chaudhury, talk about the relationship between religion and politics and how to deal with religious threats to free speech.

					Is the ‘hands-off’ internet different to internet freedom?
				
At the invitation of Index of Censorship and the Editors Guild of India, Timothy Garton Ash joins Kirsty Hughes at a panel discussion in Delhi with Shri Ajit Balakrishnan, Shri Sunil Abraham and Ramajit Singh Chima. 

					The future of free speech
				
Human Rights activist Aryeh Neier speaks about the future of free speech.

					Ayreh Neier: Why free speech is important in averting atrocities
				
Aryeh Neier, human rights lawyer and president emeritus of the Open Society Foundations speaks about the future of free speech.

					Why Rwanda and Libya need free speech – and media regulation
				
Jerry Timmins describes a new report on media in two post-conflict societies, and argues that countries like Britain should do more to support them.

					Prevent harm, allow offence?
				
Robert Simpson suggests a way to distinguish between harm and offence.

					Reader’s comment
				
We regularly highlight comments that have made an impression on us. Today’s comes from user Martinned responding to Brian Pellot’s discussion piece on the Innocence of Muslims controversy. 

					What are the biggest debates concerning Islam and free speech?
				
FSD’s Katie Engelhart sat in on this Frontline Club debate to discuss controversy surrounding the YouTube video Innocence of Muslims. 

					Müslümanların Masumiyeti videosu YouTube’un masumiyetini sona mı erdirdi?
				
YouTube ve benzeri internet platformlarının ülkenizde, dilinizde ve dünya çapında ifade özgürlüğü gündemi yaratma konusunda oynamaları gereken rol konusundaki tartışmamıza katılın. Çevrimiçi editor Brian Pellot tartışmayı başlatıyor.

					Türk medyasında nefret söylemiyle mücadele etmek
				
Hrant Dink Vakfı, Türk medyasında ırkçı ve ayrımcı söylemlere karşı Medyada Nefret Söyleminin İzlenmesi projesini 2009 yılından bu yana yürütüyor. Projenin kordinatörlerinden Melisa Akan ve Nuran Ağan bu girişimi açıklıyor.

					Censoring a billion voices to save a nation
				
Manav Bhushan, an Indian member of the Free Speech Debate team, makes the case for blocking hate-filled websites in his country.

					Katalin Barsony on empowering Roma with technology
				
Romedia Foundation aims to disseminate an insider’s view of Romani issues, empower Romani activists and challenge stereotypes through new media.

					iPhone ne zaman tehlikeli olabilir?
				
Peter Molnar mobil cihazların hızı ve yaygınlıklarının internette “nefret söylemi”nin bağlamını değiştirdiğini yazıyor. 

					Neden AB’nin “uzlaştırma makinası”nın tarihten uzak durması gerektiği üzerine
				
Claus Leggewie and Horst Meier explain why memory laws are the wrong way for Europeans to remember and debate their difficult pasts.

					Elif Şafak ile ortak insanlığımız üzerine
				
Hakkında övgüyle bahsedilen yazar Elif Şafak, ifade özgürlüğüne getirilen sınırları, romanlarına konu olan kozmopolitliği ve birlikte yaşama sanatını tartışıyor.

					Shoot the Boer: Nefret içerikli müzik?
				
Nimi Hoffmann, “Shoot the Boer” [Boerleri Vurun] adlı apartheid karşıtı şarkının 2011 yılında bir Güney Afrika mahkemesi tarafından nefret söylemi iddiasıyla yasakladığını bildiriyor.

					Westboro Vaftiz Kilisesi: ifade özgürlüğü hakkı bu mu?
				
2011 yılında ABD Yüksek Mahkemesi, eşcinsel karşıtı kiliselerin askeri cenaze törenlerinde protesto etme hakkını onayladı. Casey Selwyn yazıyor.

					Japan: Korean ‘comfort women’ photo exhibit sabotaged
				
A South Korean photographer explains his ordeal in holding an exhibition in Japan that documents ageing ‘Comfort Women’, writes Lee Yoo Eun.

					Amazon neden bizim zevk ve ahlak polisimiz olsun ki?
				
İnternet üzerinden satış yapan Amazon sitesi terör ve şiddet içerikli e-kitaplardan kâr yapmakla eleştiriliyor. Jo Glanville, kimse bize ne okumamız gerektiğini söylememeli, diyor.

					Adil olmayan bir dünyada ifade özgürlüğü
				
İfade Özgürlüğü Platformu’nun taslak 10 presibi ayrıcalıklı konumda olanlarla güçlülerin işine yarar. Sebastian Huempfer yazıyor.

					Why hate speech should not be banned
				
Restrictions on hate speech are not a means of tackling bigotry but of rebranding often obnoxious ideas or arguments are immoral, argues writer Kenan Malik.

					Basın etiği ve Anders Behring Breivik davası
				
Norveç devlet televizyonu NRK’da yapımcı editör Anne Ardem, katil Ander Behring Breivik’in savunmasının köktencilik yanlıları deter için televizyondan canlı yayınlanması gerektiğini düşünüyor. 

					Free speech in Turkey & the world – part two
				
Historian Halil Berktay discusses the denial by the Turkish state that the mass murders of hundreds of thousands of Armenians in 1915 constituted a genocide.

					Free speech in Turkey & the world – part one
				
In the first past of this debate, research fellow Kerem Öktem argues that an individual’s understanding of free speech is shaped by their personal history and geography. 

					Shami Chakrabarti: Why robust civility works from an ethical but not from a legal perspective
				
The director of civil liberties group Liberty calls for a review of all speech crime legislation in the UK.

					Why defamation laws do not protect vulnerable holders of faith
				
Three human rights experts scrutinise the defamation of religion, which they argue misses the point by protecting faith but not vulnerable believes

					Nefret söylemi yasasının zararları
				
Nefret söylemi yasası, savunmasız durumdaki azınlıkları korumaktan ziyade ifade özgürlüğü için cesaret kırıcı olur. İfade özgürlüğü avukatı Ivan Hare, Jeremy Waldron’la aynı fikirde değil.

					Susan Benesch: What is the difference between hate speech and dangerous speech?
				
Susan Benesch, senior fellow at the World Policy Institute, discusses hate speech and dangerous speech with Timothy Garton Ash

					Eşcinselliğe karşı çıkan vaiz
				
Ekim 2001’de, evanjelist bir Hristiyan vaiz olan Harry Hammond “Ahlaksızlığı Durdurun, Eşcinselliği Durdurun, Lezbiyenliği Durdurun” yazılı bir afiş hazırladı. Afişle yaptığı vaazını durdurmayı kabul etmeyince polis tarafından tutuklandı. Timothy Garton Ash öğretici bir örnek olayı tartışıyor.

					Ezra Levant: “I don’t believe hate speech is a crime”
				
“If you don’t ever feel hate, you have a broken personality,” says Canadian lawyer and publisher Ezra Levant. 

					Nefret söyleminin zararları
				
Oxford Üniversitesi’nde sosyal ve siyasi teori profesörü Jeremy Waldron, nefret söylemine karşı bir yasa olması gerektiğini savunuyor.

					How should the law define dangerous speech?
				
A trio of human rights experts elaborate on the definition of dangerous speech and consider how hate speech is protected both in Europe and under the first amendment in the US. 

					İfade özgürlüğü ile nefret söylemi arasındaki İslam
				
Mürtetler (dinden dönen) idam edilmemeli fakat dine karşı hakaret suç sayılmalıdır, diyor İranlı din adamı Mohsen Kadivar.

					Irshad Manji on Allah, Liberty and Love: Why offence is a sign of truly free speech
				
The director of the Moral Courage Project says so-called ‘respect’ for Muslims is often lined with fear and “low expectations” of those practising the faith.

					Can Europe and the Middle East agree on the terms of freedom of expression?
				
A lecture by Timothy Garton Ash in Egypt at the AUC New Cairo.

					Türkiye’deki Tabular Olgunlaşamama Durumunu Nasıl Sürekli Kılıyor?
				
Sabancı Üniversitesi öğretim üyesi Prof. Ayşe Kadıoğlu, birçoğu devlet tarafından empoze edilen tabuların insanları “bir olgunlaşmamışlık haline” hapsettiği bir ülke olan Türkiye’de büyümenin nasıl bir deneyim olduğunu anlatıyor.

					Geert Wilders Yargıda
				
2011 yılında Hollandalı milletvekili Geert Wilders Müslümanları karalamaya çalışmak ve Müslümanlara karşı şiddete ve ayrılıkçılığa teşvik suçlarından temize çıkarıldı. Rutger Kaput bu örnek olayı inceliyor.

					Aryeh Neier: Why more speech is the cure to bad speech
				
The president of the Open Society Foundations talks about free speech as a universal aspiration, group libel and the Skokie controversy.

Ara

Hesabınız

Dil