07Приватность Мы должны иметь право на охрану частной жизни и на защиту репутации, но не на противодействие расследованиям, ведущимся в интересах общества. menuПоиск темы по ключевому слову Academia (2)Access (19)Africa (8)Anonymity (7)Arab Spring (8)Art (14)Article 19 (2)Atheism (1)Australia (2)Blasphemy (16)Blogger (4)Brazil (4)Buddhism (1)Burma (2)Canada (1)Celebrity (6)Censorship (30)Charlie Hebdo (1)Child abuse (1)China (10)Christianity (13)Civility (26)Copyright (10)Corruption (2)Defamation (25)Democracy (23)Denialism (3)Discrimination (7)Education (22)Egypt (3)Europe (5)Facebook (3)Film (1)Finland (1)France (7)Freedom (40)Genocide (6)Germany (8)Google (6)Governance (11)Hate speech (19)Hinduism (1)History (16)Homosexuality (4)Humour (2)Hungary (1)Hunger strike (1)India (7)Internet (43)Internet companies (1)Islam (16)Japan (2)Journalism (22)Kenya (2)Knowledge (34)Language (9)Latin America (6)Law (52)Lese majesty (1)Liberalism (14)Libya (2)Literature (4)Media (44)Memory laws (3)Middle East (9)Minorities (4)Money (13)Morality (9)Multiculturalism (9)National security (33)Net neutrality (13)Netherlands (2)Norway (1)Nudity (4)Occupy movement (1)Open source (2)Pakistan (3)Philippines (1)Piracy (2)Poland (3)Politics (51)Pornography (7)Power (58)Privacy (20)Protest (22)Public Morality (26)Radio (2)Regulation (9)Religion (27)Reputation (16)Right to information (55)Russia (2)Rwanda (1)Satire (11)Saudi Arabia (1)Science (11)Scientology (1)Secrecy (1)Singapore (2)Social media (13)South Africa (4)Southeast Asia (3)Sport (1)Surveillance (1)Technology (22)Terrorism (5)Thailand (1)Tunisia (1)Turkey (8)Twitter (7)Ukraine (1)United Kingdom (16)United States (17)Violence (23)Whistleblowing (3)Wikileaks (1)Wikipedia (3)YouTube (1) «Monopoly is really dangerous for free speech» Ana Kasparian of #yourMSC asks our director Timothy Garton Ash about Facebook, free speech and democracy at the Munich Security Conference 2019. Glasnost! Nine ways Facebook can make itself a better forum for free speech and democracy Free Speech Debate co-authors an Oxford-Stanford report on Facebook. In defence of Europe’s memory laws There are two exceptional cases in which memory laws protect free speech, argue Grażyna Baranowska and Anna Wójcik. Is there a universal right to free speech and what are its limits? Timothy Garton Ash in conversation with Nigel Warburton, as part of the Philosophy in the Bookshop series at Blackwell’s, Oxford. Silencing 140 characters: free expression and the internet in the Gulf A seminar run by the University of Oxford’s Middle East Centre and Free Speech Debate on Free Expression in the Gulf, with Maryam al-Khawaja (Gulf Centre for Human Rights), Toby Matthieson (St. Anthony’s College) and Nicholas McGeehan (Middle East Researcher, Human Rights Watch). Chaired by Timothy Garton Ash Ben Wizner, Edward Snowden’s lawyer: To what extent should government be allowed to curtail civil liberties for the sake of national security? Ben Wizner, Edward Snowden’s ACLU lawyer, reflects on the state of and importance of the right to free speech in 2017. He argues we must not overuse the term ‘national security’ or surrender our right to privacy because we have nothing to hide, for we would not deny somebody the right to free speech because they had nothing to say. An introductory guide to the ten principles Our social media team have created a new way to explore the 10 principles on Youtube. Luciano Floridi: What contribution can the philosophy of information make to our understanding of free speech? Luciano Floridi, Professor at the Oxford Internet Institute of the University of Oxford, speaks to Free Speech Debate about the philosophy of information, European data protection, and contemporary challenges to free speech. What happened to ‘the right to be forgotten’? Free Speech Debate tells the story of the advisory council to Google on the right to be forgotten, and talks to council member Luciano Floridi. Репутация Мы должны иметь право на охрану частной жизни и на защиту репутации, но не на противодействие расследованиям, ведущимся в интересах общества. Приватность Мы должны иметь право на охрану частной жизни и на защиту репутации, но не на противодействие расследованиям, ведущимся в интересах общества. Should ‘revenge porn’ be illegal? Max Harris explains how Britain legislated against it and compares this with the position in other common law countries What is it like to be a satirical cartoonist in Malaysia? Malaysian cartoonist Zunar talks about what it means to be a satirical cartoonist in Malaysia. Google grapples with the ‘right to be forgotten’ Katie Engelhart attends the public hearing of Google’s Advisory Council, set up in response to a European Court of Justice judgement. Privacy: Sample our intellectual buffet. Or make your own meal. Timothy Garton Ash introduces a sample tour of the content on our site A short history of disappearing privacy on Facebook Since Facebook launched in 2005 its default privacy settings have undergone radical changes, giving more access to personal data than many are aware of. US Supreme Court strikes down law creating ‘buffer zone’ around abortion clinics In the case of McCullen v Coakley, the US Supreme Court issued a landmark ruling about restrictions on speech around abortion clinics. Max Harris explains. How an attempt at ‘libel tourism’ rebounded on a Tanzanian tycoon A British citizen blogged about a Tanzanian media magnate involved in throwing her and her husband off their Tanzanian farm. He sued for libel in a British court. Dominic Burbidge explains. National security and privacy: striking the balance Anthony Lester and Zoe McCallum discuss the need to balance national security and privacy in the age of internet surveillance. Is it a crime to offend bread? For one taxi company in the Russian town of Kostroma, the answer turned out to be yes. Sergey Fadeev explains. Can a law-abiding liberal democracy be Big Brother? Jeff Howard explores the legal basis on which the US is collecting vast amounts of data on foreign and US citizens, despite the Fourth Amendment. Нужен ли Индии свой Левесон? В Индии разворачиваются дебаты по поводу государственного контроля над СМИ. В этой статье Аргия Сенгупта размышляет о том, как призрак «чрезвычайного положения» 1970-х годов затрудняет переход от дискредитировавшего себя саморегулирования к государственному регулированию прессы. Когда и где можно разрешать демонстрации экстремистов? Протесты, проводимые ультраправыми группами в этнически разнородных районах являются провокацией, но запрет на них повлек бы за собой нежелательные последствия. Джош Блэк рассматривает случай запрета на демонстрацию Английской защитной лиги на востоке Лондона. Is privacy getting lost in Google’s «cracks and crevices»? A globally-effective privacy regime is a realistic goal, argues Ian Brown. But it needs giants like Google to get behind it. A right to privacy? Not at the expense of free speech! Our user imos.org.uk argues with one of our draft principles challenging the idea that privacy is a condition for free speech. Cyber-bullying that led to suicide On 10 October 2012 the Canadian teenager Amanda Todd committed suicide after years of cyber-bullying and harassment. Judith Bruhn describes a shocking case. Законно ли клеветать на собственное правительство? В 1964 г. Верховный Суд США подтвердил положение, согласно которому люди, выступающие с критикой государственных официальных лиц, не могут быть наказаны, даже если их критика не соответствует действительности. Джефф Говард разъясняет это знаменательное судебное решение, основанное на Первой поправке Конституции США. The Nira Radia tapes controversy and the right to privacy Should government-initiated phone hacking be made public if the recordings are in the public interest? Shubhangi Bhadada exposes the thin line in India between the right to privacy and freedom of expression. Former British agent, Annie Machon: What is the case for whistleblowing? Former British MI5 agent Annie Machon revealed, together with David Shayler, alleged criminal behaviour within the agency. In an interview with Sebastian Huempfer she speaks about the need for official channels through which whistleblowers can voice their concerns. Имеет ли убийца право на анонимность? В 2008 г., два человека, осужденных за убийство, попросили удалить их имена из Википедии и интернет-СМИ, согласно законам Германии. Что важнее – право человека на анонимность или право общественности на информацию? Facebook и автоматическое тэггирование Должен ли Facebook автоматически проставлять тэги на фотографиях пользователей? Себастиан Хэмпфер размышляет о том, насколько программное обеспечение, позволяющее проставлять тэги автоматически, нарушает личное пространство пользователей. Может ли алгоритм Google оскорбить жену политика? Введите «Bettina Wulff», имя жены бывшего президента Германии, в поисковую строку Google и система автоматически добавит слово «escort», что означает «женщина, нанятая для сопровождения мужчины» и подразумевает форму проституции. Может ли такой алгоритм быть формой диффамации? Себастиан Хэмпфер рассматривает этот пример.
«Monopoly is really dangerous for free speech» Ana Kasparian of #yourMSC asks our director Timothy Garton Ash about Facebook, free speech and democracy at the Munich Security Conference 2019.
Glasnost! Nine ways Facebook can make itself a better forum for free speech and democracy Free Speech Debate co-authors an Oxford-Stanford report on Facebook.
In defence of Europe’s memory laws There are two exceptional cases in which memory laws protect free speech, argue Grażyna Baranowska and Anna Wójcik.
Is there a universal right to free speech and what are its limits? Timothy Garton Ash in conversation with Nigel Warburton, as part of the Philosophy in the Bookshop series at Blackwell’s, Oxford.
Silencing 140 characters: free expression and the internet in the Gulf A seminar run by the University of Oxford’s Middle East Centre and Free Speech Debate on Free Expression in the Gulf, with Maryam al-Khawaja (Gulf Centre for Human Rights), Toby Matthieson (St. Anthony’s College) and Nicholas McGeehan (Middle East Researcher, Human Rights Watch). Chaired by Timothy Garton Ash
Ben Wizner, Edward Snowden’s lawyer: To what extent should government be allowed to curtail civil liberties for the sake of national security? Ben Wizner, Edward Snowden’s ACLU lawyer, reflects on the state of and importance of the right to free speech in 2017. He argues we must not overuse the term ‘national security’ or surrender our right to privacy because we have nothing to hide, for we would not deny somebody the right to free speech because they had nothing to say.
An introductory guide to the ten principles Our social media team have created a new way to explore the 10 principles on Youtube.
Luciano Floridi: What contribution can the philosophy of information make to our understanding of free speech? Luciano Floridi, Professor at the Oxford Internet Institute of the University of Oxford, speaks to Free Speech Debate about the philosophy of information, European data protection, and contemporary challenges to free speech.
What happened to ‘the right to be forgotten’? Free Speech Debate tells the story of the advisory council to Google on the right to be forgotten, and talks to council member Luciano Floridi.
Репутация Мы должны иметь право на охрану частной жизни и на защиту репутации, но не на противодействие расследованиям, ведущимся в интересах общества.
Приватность Мы должны иметь право на охрану частной жизни и на защиту репутации, но не на противодействие расследованиям, ведущимся в интересах общества.
Should ‘revenge porn’ be illegal? Max Harris explains how Britain legislated against it and compares this with the position in other common law countries
What is it like to be a satirical cartoonist in Malaysia? Malaysian cartoonist Zunar talks about what it means to be a satirical cartoonist in Malaysia.
Google grapples with the ‘right to be forgotten’ Katie Engelhart attends the public hearing of Google’s Advisory Council, set up in response to a European Court of Justice judgement.
Privacy: Sample our intellectual buffet. Or make your own meal. Timothy Garton Ash introduces a sample tour of the content on our site
A short history of disappearing privacy on Facebook Since Facebook launched in 2005 its default privacy settings have undergone radical changes, giving more access to personal data than many are aware of.
US Supreme Court strikes down law creating ‘buffer zone’ around abortion clinics In the case of McCullen v Coakley, the US Supreme Court issued a landmark ruling about restrictions on speech around abortion clinics. Max Harris explains.
How an attempt at ‘libel tourism’ rebounded on a Tanzanian tycoon A British citizen blogged about a Tanzanian media magnate involved in throwing her and her husband off their Tanzanian farm. He sued for libel in a British court. Dominic Burbidge explains.
National security and privacy: striking the balance Anthony Lester and Zoe McCallum discuss the need to balance national security and privacy in the age of internet surveillance.
Is it a crime to offend bread? For one taxi company in the Russian town of Kostroma, the answer turned out to be yes. Sergey Fadeev explains.
Can a law-abiding liberal democracy be Big Brother? Jeff Howard explores the legal basis on which the US is collecting vast amounts of data on foreign and US citizens, despite the Fourth Amendment.
Нужен ли Индии свой Левесон? В Индии разворачиваются дебаты по поводу государственного контроля над СМИ. В этой статье Аргия Сенгупта размышляет о том, как призрак «чрезвычайного положения» 1970-х годов затрудняет переход от дискредитировавшего себя саморегулирования к государственному регулированию прессы.
Когда и где можно разрешать демонстрации экстремистов? Протесты, проводимые ультраправыми группами в этнически разнородных районах являются провокацией, но запрет на них повлек бы за собой нежелательные последствия. Джош Блэк рассматривает случай запрета на демонстрацию Английской защитной лиги на востоке Лондона.
Is privacy getting lost in Google’s «cracks and crevices»? A globally-effective privacy regime is a realistic goal, argues Ian Brown. But it needs giants like Google to get behind it.
A right to privacy? Not at the expense of free speech! Our user imos.org.uk argues with one of our draft principles challenging the idea that privacy is a condition for free speech.
Cyber-bullying that led to suicide On 10 October 2012 the Canadian teenager Amanda Todd committed suicide after years of cyber-bullying and harassment. Judith Bruhn describes a shocking case.
Законно ли клеветать на собственное правительство? В 1964 г. Верховный Суд США подтвердил положение, согласно которому люди, выступающие с критикой государственных официальных лиц, не могут быть наказаны, даже если их критика не соответствует действительности. Джефф Говард разъясняет это знаменательное судебное решение, основанное на Первой поправке Конституции США.
The Nira Radia tapes controversy and the right to privacy Should government-initiated phone hacking be made public if the recordings are in the public interest? Shubhangi Bhadada exposes the thin line in India between the right to privacy and freedom of expression.
Former British agent, Annie Machon: What is the case for whistleblowing? Former British MI5 agent Annie Machon revealed, together with David Shayler, alleged criminal behaviour within the agency. In an interview with Sebastian Huempfer she speaks about the need for official channels through which whistleblowers can voice their concerns.
Имеет ли убийца право на анонимность? В 2008 г., два человека, осужденных за убийство, попросили удалить их имена из Википедии и интернет-СМИ, согласно законам Германии. Что важнее – право человека на анонимность или право общественности на информацию?
Facebook и автоматическое тэггирование Должен ли Facebook автоматически проставлять тэги на фотографиях пользователей? Себастиан Хэмпфер размышляет о том, насколько программное обеспечение, позволяющее проставлять тэги автоматически, нарушает личное пространство пользователей.
Может ли алгоритм Google оскорбить жену политика? Введите «Bettina Wulff», имя жены бывшего президента Германии, в поисковую строку Google и система автоматически добавит слово «escort», что означает «женщина, нанятая для сопровождения мужчины» и подразумевает форму проституции. Может ли такой алгоритм быть формой диффамации? Себастиан Хэмпфер рассматривает этот пример.