Filtrar por categoria 'Hate speech' contendo 153 posts

Academia (2)
Access (22)
Africa (9)
Anonymity (10)
Antisemitism (2)
Arab Spring (9)
Art (15)
Article 19 (3)
Atheism (2)
Australia (4)
Blasphemy (16)
Blogger (5)
Books (1)
Brazil (4)
Buddhism (2)
Burma (3)
Canada (2)
Celebrity (4)
Censorship (38)
Charlie Hebdo (2)
Child abuse (1)
China (12)
Christianity (13)
Civility (40)
Colonialism (1)
Copyright (11)
Corruption (3)
Defamation (28)
Democracy (28)
Denialism (2)
Denmark (1)
Discrimination (9)
Education (21)
Egypt (4)
Europe (6)
Exclusion (1)
Facebook (5)
Film (1)
Finland (1)
France (8)
Freedom (51)
Gaza conflict (1)
Genocide (6)
Germany (9)
Google (6)
Governance (9)
Hate speech (24)
Hinduism (1)
History (20)
Homosexuality (5)
Humour (2)
Hungary (1)
Hunger strike (1)
India (12)
Internet (51)
Internet companies (1)
Islam (21)
Israel (2)
Japan (2)
Journalism (26)
Kenya (2)
Knowledge (32)
Language (11)
Latin America (6)
Law (66)
Lese majesty (1)
Liberalism (14)
Libya (2)
Literature (6)
Media (52)
Memory laws (3)
Middle East (11)
Minorities (5)
Money (12)
Morality (9)
Multiculturalism (12)
National security (38)
Net neutrality (18)
Netherlands (2)
Norway (1)
Nudity (5)
Occupy movement (1)
Open source (2)
Pakistan (2)
Palestine (2)
Philippines (1)
Piracy (2)
Poland (2)
Politics (59)
Pornography (10)
Power (65)
Privacy (27)
Protest (24)
Public Morality (33)
Race (1)
Radio (3)
Regulation (10)
Religion (33)
Reputation (18)
Right to information (61)
Russia (2)
Rwanda (1)
Satire (11)
Saudi Arabia (2)
Science (10)
Scientology (1)
Secrecy (1)
Singapore (2)
Social media (17)
South Africa (4)
Southeast Asia (3)
Sport (1)
Surveillance (2)
Syria (1)
Technology (29)
Terrorism (4)
Thailand (1)
Tunisia (1)
Turkey (9)
Twitter (9)
Ukraine (1)
United Kingdom (19)
United States (18)
Violence (32)
Whistleblowing (2)
Wikipedia (3)
YouTube (1)

			
					Art with the ‘courage of thought’ is the best response to ‘hate speech’
				
Hungarian academic and performer Peter Molnar explains the importance of Gondolatbátorság to his ‘Hate Speech’ Monologues.

					The left’s version of hate speech: guilt by association
				
Leftists who argue for hate speech bans ignore the far left’s own version, argues Eric Heinze.

					An insistent effort by the Hrant Dink Foundation against hate speech in Turkey
				
Pınar Ensari and Funda Tekin explain the work of the Hrant Dink Foundation in countering hate speech in Turkey.

					An introductory guide to the ten principles
				
Our social media team have created a new way to explore the 10 principles on Youtube.

					From censorship by government to censorship by terrorism
				
Paul Cliteur and Tom Herrenberg, editors of a book on The Fall and Rise of Blasphemy Law, consider the changing nature of censorship.

					Is dangerous speech free speech?
				
Expression can be dangerous, but that should not necessarily make it a crime. Jeffrey Howard evaluates the best argument for banning hate speech. 

					The ‘lying press’ and the crisis of confidence in German media
				
Maja Sojref and Sarah Glatte explore the growing public disillusionment with the mainstream press in Germany.

					Why is Mein Kampf the 12th most sold history book on Amazon India?
				
Udit Bhatia discusses attitudes to, and ignorance of Hitler in India.

					When is speech dangerous?
				
Jonathan Leader Maynard examines the difficulties in assessing and managing the role of speech in violence.

					‘No-platforming’ on university campuses: political correctness and the subversion of free speech
				
Monica Richter argues that no-platforming is more about censoring unpalatable views than protecting marginalised groups.

					Don’t ban no-platforming
				
Sizwe Mpofu-Walsh argues that no-platforming is an expressive act that can expand the field of debate, rather than the denial of free speech.

					Ten arguments for – and against – ‘no-platforming’
				
Eric Heinze sets out the flaws in the commonly heard arguments for no-platforming.

					Why people shouldn’t feel the need to censor themselves
				
Roger Scruton argues that self-censorship can be as much a threat to free speech as its government equivalent.

					Why ‘no-platforming’ those who peddle hate speech does not pose a free speech issue
				
Purushottam Vikas engages with criticisms directed at a controversial petition regarding an Oxford India Society speaking event.

					Rae Langton: Why an understanding of silence is important to free speech debates
				
In this interview for Free Speech Debate, renowned Philosophy Professor Rae Langton speaks about the value of philosophy for our understanding of free speech and discusses aspects of her work on pornography and the silencing of women. 

					What is right speech and why is it important?
				
Leslie Green argues that Buddhist ideas  about avoiding divisive, abusive and  false speech can help us live together well in free societies

					Living in outrageous times
				
Peter Bradley argues that we should tolerate offence but be less offensive

					A landmark Canadian hate speech case: Her Majesty the Queen v Keegstra
				
In 1990, the Supreme Court of Canada issued a famous ruling in a case involving a high school teacher and alleged anti-Semitism.  Max Harris explains.

					EU versus intellectual freedom?
				
In a bid to synchronise hate crimes, the EU is seeking unity amongst members states against the denial of historical injustices. Is this the EU versus member states’ appreciation of intellectual freedom? Luigi Cajani explains.

					Eatock v Bolt: um Controverso Caso de Discurso de Ódio Australiano
				
Max Harris explica porque se considerou que o jornalista Andrew Bolt violou o Racial Discrimination Act por causa de artigos sobre “O  povo aborígene de pele clara”.

					Nineteen arguments for hate speech bans – and against them
				
Free speech scholar Eric Heinze identifies the main arguments for laws restricting hate speech and says none are valid for mature Western democracies.  

					Regulating hate speech: lessons for Asia
				
Cherian George on how hate speech is gaining virulence in Asian countries such as Myanmar, and how peace-building workshops represent a positive step forward.  

					From incitement to self-censorship: the media in the Kenyan elections of 2007 and 2013
				
Katherine Bruce-Lockhart looks at the media’s role in two Kenyan elections and argues that peace and critical media coverage should not be mutually exclusive. 

					‘They used the oven to get tanned, you know…’
				
Marc-Antoine Dilhac recounts how he confronted anti-semitic prejudice in a French classroom, and argues that more good  comes from an open debate about hate speech than from banning it. 

					Martha Nussbaum: How can we best approach the challenge of religious difference?
				
Legal philosopher Martha Nussbaum gave the 2013 Dahrendorf Lecture, exploring how to live with religious diversity.

					A diferença entre genocídio e crimes contra a humanidade
				
Costumamos destacar comentários que nos causaram uma boa impressão. Antoon de Baets deixou uma resposta esclarecedora na discussão de Josie Appleton sobre as leis de memória na França.

					Free Speech Bites
				
Nigel Warburton spoke with Timothy Garton Ash for Index on Censorship’s Free Speech Bites about the Free Speech Debate Project and global free speech standards.

					Quando é que o discurso de ódio se torna em discurso perigoso? Vejam-se os casos do Quénia e a Ruanda
				
O julgamento do apresentador queniano Joshua Arap Sang, que está para breve, levanta questões vitais sobre a relação entre as palavras e a violência, defende Katherine Bruce-Lockhart.

					As condenações a Brigitte Bardot por incitar o ódio racial
				
Pode-se deixar uma atriz famosa denunciar uma ‘superpopulação’ de estrangeiros? Por Michèle Finck.

					Taming the gods: How should we deal with religious threats to free speech?
				
At the 2013 Jaipur Festival, Ian Buruma, Reza Aslan, Ahdaf Souief and Timothy Garton Ash, in conversation with Shoma Chaudhury, talk about the relationship between religion and politics and how to deal with religious threats to free speech.

					Is the ‘hands-off’ internet different to internet freedom?
				
At the invitation of Index of Censorship and the Editors Guild of India, Timothy Garton Ash joins Kirsty Hughes at a panel discussion in Delhi with Shri Ajit Balakrishnan, Shri Sunil Abraham and Ramajit Singh Chima. 

					O futuro da liberdade de expressão
				
O ativista de direitos humanos Aryeh Neier fala sobre o futuro da liberdade de expressão.

					Ayreh Neier: Why free speech is important in averting atrocities
				
Aryeh Neier, human rights lawyer and president emeritus of the Open Society Foundations speaks about the future of free speech.

					Por que Ruanda e Líbia precisam de liberdade de expressão – e não regulação da mídia
				
Jerry Timmins descreve sobre a mídia em duas sociedades pós-conflito e argumenta que países como a Grã-Bretanha deveriam fazer mais para apoiá-los.

					Prevenir danos é permitir ofensa?
				
Robert Simpson suggests a way to distinguish between harm and offence.

					Reader’s comment
				
We regularly highlight comments that have made an impression on us. Today’s comes from user Martinned responding to Brian Pellot’s discussion piece on the Innocence of Muslims controversy. 

					What are the biggest debates concerning Islam and free speech?
				
FSD’s Katie Engelhart sat in on this Frontline Club debate to discuss controversy surrounding the YouTube video Innocence of Muslims. 

					O video “A inocência dos muçulmanos” acabou com a inocência do YouTube?
				
Entre no debate sobre o papel que plataformas como You Tube devem ter em relação às reivindicações de liberdade de expressão em seu país, sua língua e no mundo. O editor do LED Brian Pellot dá início ao debate.

					Combatendo discursos de ódio na mídia turca
				
Desde de 2009, a fundação Hrant Dink coordena o projeto Observatório da Mídia que combate discursos de ódio, racismo e discriminação na imprensa da Turquia. Os coordenadores Melisa Akan e Nuran Agan explicam como funciona essa iniciativa.

					Censoring a billion voices to save a nation
				
Manav Bhushan, an Indian member of the Free Speech Debate team, makes the case for blocking hate-filled websites in his country.

					Katalin Barsony on empowering Roma with technology
				
Romedia Foundation aims to disseminate an insider’s view of Romani issues, empower Romani activists and challenge stereotypes through new media.

					Quando um iPhone pode ser periogoso
				
A velocidade e a onipresença da telefones celulares mudaram o contexto dos “discursos de ódio” na internet, argumenta Peter Molnar.

					Por que a “máquina de harmonização” da União Europeia deve ficar afastada da história
				
Claus Leggewie e Horst Meier explicam por que leis sobre memória são métodos equivocados para os europeus lembrarem e debaterem as dificuldades do passado.

					Elif Shafak fala sobre a humanidade que temos em comum
				
A famosa escritora turca discute os limites da liberdade de expressão, o cosmopolitismo de seus romances e a arte da coexistência.

					‘Shoot the Boer’: uma música de ódio?
				
Em 2011, um tribunal da África do Sul proibiu a canção contra o apartheid “Shoot the Boer” [atire no bôer] ao entender que se tratava de discurso de incitação ao ódio, relata Nimi Hoffmann.

					A Igreja Batista de Westboro: direito à liberdade de expressão?
				
Em 2011, a suprema corte dos EUA decidiu a favor do direito da igreja de protestar contra homossexuais em funerais militares, relata Casey Selwyn.

					Japan: Korean ‘comfort women’ photo exhibit sabotaged
				
A South Korean photographer explains his ordeal in holding an exhibition in Japan that documents ageing ‘Comfort Women’, writes Lee Yoo Eun.

					Será que a Amazon deve ser a nossa referência em termos de decência e gosto?
				
A revendedora eletrônica tem sido criticada por lucrar com livros de terror e violência. Ninguém deve nos dizer o que devemos ler, afirma Jo Glanville.

					Liberdade de expressão num mundo injusto
				
As 10 propostas de princípios do Liberdade de Expressão em Debate beneficiam aqueles que estão em posições de privilégio e poder, questiona Sebastian Huempfer.

					Por que o discurso de ódio não deveria ser banido
				
Restrições ao discurso ao ódio não são uma maneira de resolver a intolerância, mas de reclassificar ideias e argumentos geralmente odiosos como imorais, argumenta o escritor Kenan Malik.

					A ética da mídia e o julgamento de Anders Behring Breivik
				
O testemunho do assassino Anders Behring Breivik deve ser transmitido ao vivo para que o extremismo seja desestimulado, argumenta Anne Ardem, editora executiva da televisão estatal norueguesa NRK.

					Free speech in Turkey & the world – part two
				
Historian Halil Berktay discusses the denial by the Turkish state that the mass murders of hundreds of thousands of Armenians in 1915 constituted a genocide.

					Free speech in Turkey & the world – part one
				
In the first past of this debate, research fellow Kerem Öktem argues that an individual’s understanding of free speech is shaped by their personal history and geography. 

					Shami Chakrabarti: Why robust civility works from an ethical but not from a legal perspective
				
The director of civil liberties group Liberty calls for a review of all speech crime legislation in the UK.

					Why defamation laws do not protect vulnerable holders of faith
				
Three human rights experts scrutinise the defamation of religion, which they argue misses the point by protecting faith but not vulnerable believes

					Os problemas da legislação do discurso do ódio
				
A legislação do discurso do ódio desencoraja a liberdade de expressão mais do que protege as minorias vulneráveis. O advogado de liberdade de expressão Ivan Hare rebate os argumentos de Jeremy Waldron

					Susan Benesch: What is the difference between hate speech and dangerous speech?
				
Susan Benesch, senior fellow at the World Policy Institute, discusses hate speech and dangerous speech with Timothy Garton Ash

					O pastor contra a homossexualidade
				
Em outubro de 2001, o pastor evangélico cristão Harry Hammond levantou uma placa que dizia “Abaixo a imoralidade, abaixo o homossexualismo, abaixo o lesbianismo.” Quando Hammond se rescusou a desistir de sua manifestação, um policial o prendeu. Timothy Garton Ash discute esse caso.

					Ezra Levant: “I don’t believe hate speech is a crime”
				
“If you don’t ever feel hate, you have a broken personality,” says Canadian lawyer and publisher Ezra Levant. 

					Os danos causados pelo discurso de ódio
				
Jeremy Waldron, professor de ciências sociais e políticas da Universidade de Oxford, diz que é preciso uma legislação contra o discurso de ódio.

					How should the law define dangerous speech?
				
A trio of human rights experts elaborate on the definition of dangerous speech and consider how hate speech is protected both in Europe and under the first amendment in the US. 

					O islã entre a liberdade de expressão e o discurso do ódio
				
A execução de dissidentes deveria ser proibida, mas insultar uma religião deveria ser reconhecido como crime, escreve o clérigo iraniano Mohsen Kadivar.

					Irshad Manji on Allah, Liberty and Love: Why offence is a sign of truly free speech
				
The director of the Moral Courage Project says so-called ‘respect’ for Muslims is often lined with fear and “low expectations” of those practising the faith.

					Can Europe and the Middle East agree on the terms of freedom of expression?
				
A lecture by Timothy Garton Ash in Egypt at the AUC New Cairo.

					Como os tabus turcos perpetuam a imaturidade
				
A professora Ayşe Kadıoğlu, da Universidade Sabancı, fala de sua experiência de crescer na Turquia, onde os tabus, muitos deles impostos pela lei, aprisionaram os cidadãos em um “estado de imaturidade”.

					O julgamento de Geert Wilders
				
Em 2011, o político holandês de direita Geert Wilders foi absolvido das acusações de difamação, incitação ao ódio e discriminação contra muçulmanos. Rutger Kaput discute o caso.

					Aryeh Neier: Why more speech is the cure to bad speech
				
The president of the Open Society Foundations talks about free speech as a universal aspiration, group libel and the Skokie controversy.

Busca

A sua conta

Língua