Ken MacDonald: Should British universities be responsible for counter-terrorism?

In this interview, Ken Macdonald, formerly Britain’s Director of Public Prosecutions and now Warden of Wadham College, Oxford, talks about the importance of free speech and the introduction of “prevent” duties to universities. He also comments on the Rhodes Must Fall campaign.

Since the mid-2000s, it’s been said that counter-terrorism measures have restricted free speech, especially in universities.  The debate came to a head in 2015, with the creation of “prevent” duties under the Counter-Terrorism and Security Act 2015, which require universities, hospitals, schools, and other institutions to have “due regard to the need to prevent people from being drawn into terrorism”.

In early 2016, Max Harris and Sarah Glatte of Free Speech Debate sat down with Lord Ken Macdonald, Warden of Wadham College, to talk about these issues.  Lord Macdonald introduced amendments in the House of Lords to ensure that “prevent” duties were applied in a way that is respectful of free speech and academic freedom, and has worked with the University of Oxford in its application of “prevent”.  Ken Macdonald is a Queen’s Counsel, a past Director of Public Prosecutions, a Deputy High Court Judge, and Chair of Reprieve, a charity working against the death penalty worldwide.  He became a Liberal Democrat life peer in 2010.

Lord Macdonald talks in this interview about the importance of free speech, and observes that the British government’s introduction of counter-terrorism programme, Prevent, in universities was “a mistake.”  He also comments on the Rhodes Must Fall campaign in Oxford.

Read more:

Comments (1)

Automated machine translations are provided by Google Translate. They should give you a rough idea of what the contributor has said, but cannot be relied on to give an accurate, nuanced translation. Please read them with this in mind.

  1. With respect to Rhodes Must Fall.
    Surely as statues are erected to remember the great things done in the name of the hero, it could be thus kept to show the other side of the story and so should be left, and once a year it could be used as a point of lectures and information of what Cecil Rhodes did as seen from the African perspective.
    I should add, I did my secondary education in Rhodesia.

Leave a comment in any language


Swipe left to browse all of the highlights.

Free Speech Debate is a research project of the Dahrendorf Programme for the Study of Freedom at St Antony's College in the University of Oxford.

The University of Oxford