Helen Haft examines the case of a blogger prosecuted after an online argument and its implications for Russian free speech.
Neil Dullaghan sums up a year of conflict and controversy for free speech, catalogued on our website.
Julian Simmons examines a Singaporean’s expletive-laden video on the recently deceased leader and his conviction for wounding religious feelings.
Giles Fraser, commentator and Anglican priest, talks with Declan Johnston about the relationship between free speech and religion, and the Charlie Hebdo attacks in Paris.
The celebrated English novelist on Islam’s ‘totalitarian moment’ and why freedom of expression is not religion’s enemy but its protector.
Alain Bouldoires talks to Timothy Garton Ash about the survival of blasphemy laws in Europe, and calls for a ‘right to blaspheme’.
The Mormons reacted brilliantly to the musical satirising their faith, but something important is lost when we treat religions so differently – writes Katie Engelhart.
The Russian parliament’s vote in support of a declaration against acts offending religious sentiments is symptomatic of worrying trends, write Olga Shvarova and Dominic Burbidge.
At the 2013 Jaipur Festival, Ian Buruma, Reza Aslan, Ahdaf Souief and Timothy Garton Ash, in conversation with Shoma Chaudhury, talk about the relationship between religion and politics and how to deal with religious threats to free speech.
Islam, Christianity and Judaism are often accused of wanting to restrict free speech. Dominic Burbidge suggests a radically different perspective, from inside the thought-system of the Abrahamic faiths.
FSD’s Katie Engelhart sat in on this Frontline Club debate to discuss controversy surrounding the YouTube video Innocence of Muslims.
Join us to debate the role internet platforms like YouTube should play in setting free speech agendas in your country, your language and across the world. Online editor Brian Pellot kicks off the discussion.
Olga Shvarova argues that Russian officials used the Orthodox Church as a political pawn to reinforce their own power during the Pussy Riot trial.
Following the Arab Spring, a venerable Islamic institution’s new Statement on Basic Freedoms suggests where sharia law may (and may not) be compatible with international conventions to guarantee free expression.
Was punk band Pussy Riot’s anti-Putin performance in a Moscow church ‘religious hatred hooliganism’ or an artistic form of political dissent? Olga Shvarova considers the case.
In 2011, the US supreme court ruled in favour of the anti-gay church’s right to protest at military funerals, writes Casey Selwyn.
This latest episode looks at the ethics of hacktivism, crowdsourcing in war zones and the right of Christians in the UK to wear the cross at work.
A new Tennessee law will permit teachers to discuss creationism alongside theories of evolution, writes Casey Selwyn.
Two Christian women are taking their fight to wear a crucifix in the workplace to the European Court of Human Rights, writes Dominic Burbidge.
Three human rights experts scrutinise the defamation of religion, which they argue misses the point by protecting faith but not vulnerable believes
अक्तूबर 2001 में हैरी हैमंड नामक एक इवैंजेलिकल ईसाई धर्मोपदेशक ने एक पोस्टर आयोजित किया जिस पर कहावत थी “बंद करो अनैतिकता, बंद करो समलैंगिकता, बंद करो समलैंगिकता।” जब हैमंड ने रोकने से इनकार कर दिया, एक पुलिसकर्मी ने उसे गिरफ्तार कर लिया। टिमोथी गर्तोन ऐश इस शिक्षाप्रद मामले पर चर्चा करते है।
The second episode of FSD’s monthly podcast looks at free speech in India, internet censorship in China and Facebook’s attitude towards privacy.
The director general of the BBC explains why it aired Jerry Springer: The Opera, and talks about different responses to Christianity and Islam.
BBC television’s broadcast of Jerry Springer: The Opera in January 2005 was met with protests by Christian groups. Maryam Omidi discusses whether the BBC was right to air the programme.
In 2010, Polish singer Doda was charged with “offending religious feelings” after she said she believed more in dinosaurs than the creation story in the Bible. Annabelle Chapman considers the case.
1987 में, न्यूयॉर्क स्थित कलाकार एन्ड्रेस सेर्रानो अपने ही मूत्र को एक जार में रख उसमें एक प्लास्टिक का ईद्भास डूबोई और तस्वीर खींच ली। परिणामस्वरूप कार्य – पूर्ण शीर्षक : विसर्जन (मूत्र मसीह) – 1989 में मामूली प्रशंसा के साथ प्रदर्शित किया गया था, और इसने समकालीन कला के दक्षिणपूर्वी केंद्र का “दृश्य कला में पुरस्कार” जीता। सेर्रानो ने तस्वीर को धर्म के व्यावसायीकरण पर एक टिप्पणी के रूप वर्णन किया था।