लेखक के हिसाब से फ़िल्टर करें 'WIZNER Ben' who has authored 1 Posts menu संकेतशब्दो द्वारा विषयों को खोजे Academia (2)Access (2)Anonymity (4)Arab Spring (1)Art (6)Australia (1)Blasphemy (3)Brazil (1)Canada (1)Celebrity (2)Censorship (5)Charlie Hebdo (1)China (2)Christianity (3)Civility (8)Colonialism (2)Corruption (1)Defamation (2)Democracy (6)Discrimination (1)Education (4)Egypt (1)Facebook (1)Film (1)France (2)Freedom (12)Genocide (1)Germany (1)Governance (3)Hate speech (1)Hinduism (2)History (7)Homosexuality (1)Hunger strike (1)India (6)Internet (9)Internet companies (1)Islam (2)Japan (2)Journalism (4)Knowledge (4)Latin America (1)Law (10)Liberalism (5)Literature (1)Media (5)Memory laws (1)Middle East (1)Morality (3)Multiculturalism (1)National security (6)Net neutrality (5)Netherlands (1)Nudity (4)Pakistan (1)Politics (10)Pornography (4)Power (10)Privacy (6)Protest (4)Public Morality (9)Regulation (1)Religion (5)Reputation (3)Right to information (5)Russia (1)Satire (4)Science (1)Social media (2)Surveillance (1)Technology (5)Twitter (1)United Kingdom (1)United States (1)University (1)Violence (5)Whistleblowing (1)Wikipedia (2) Ben Wizner, Edward Snowden’s lawyer: To what extent should government be allowed to curtail civil liberties for the sake of national security? Ben Wizner, Edward Snowden’s ACLU lawyer, reflects on the state of and importance of the right to free speech in 2017. He argues we must not overuse the term ‘national security’ or surrender our right to privacy because we have nothing to hide, for we would not deny somebody the right to free speech because they had nothing to say.
Ben Wizner, Edward Snowden’s lawyer: To what extent should government be allowed to curtail civil liberties for the sake of national security? Ben Wizner, Edward Snowden’s ACLU lawyer, reflects on the state of and importance of the right to free speech in 2017. He argues we must not overuse the term ‘national security’ or surrender our right to privacy because we have nothing to hide, for we would not deny somebody the right to free speech because they had nothing to say.