07Vie privée

Nous devons êtres capables de protéger notre vie privée et riposter si nos réputations sont attaquées mais ne devons pas empêcher une inquisition quand elle est d’intérêt public.

Academia (2)
Access (18)
Africa (9)
Anonymity (8)
Antisemitism (1)
Arab Spring (5)
Art (14)
Article 19 (2)
Atheism (1)
Australia (4)
Blasphemy (16)
Blogger (4)
Books (2)
Brazil (4)
Buddhism (1)
Burma (2)
Canada (2)
Celebrity (5)
Censorship (33)
Charlie Hebdo (2)
Child abuse (1)
China (10)
Christianity (13)
Civility (33)
Colonialism (1)
Copyright (10)
Corruption (3)
Defamation (27)
Democracy (27)
Denialism (3)
Denmark (2)
Discrimination (9)
Education (19)
Egypt (1)
Europe (5)
Exclusion (1)
Facebook (4)
Film (1)
Finland (1)
France (8)
Freedom (44)
Genocide (7)
Germany (10)
Google (5)
Governance (10)
Hate speech (22)
Hinduism (1)
History (19)
Homosexuality (4)
Humour (2)
Hungary (1)
Hunger strike (1)
India (10)
Internet (43)
Internet companies (1)
Islam (17)
Israel (1)
Japan (2)
Journalism (25)
Kenya (3)
Knowledge (30)
Language (8)
Latin America (5)
Law (59)
Lese majesty (1)
Liberalism (14)
Libya (2)
Literature (3)
Media (49)
Memory laws (3)
Middle East (8)
Minorities (5)
Money (10)
Morality (9)
Multiculturalism (9)
National security (38)
Net neutrality (14)
Netherlands (2)
Norway (1)
Nudity (5)
Occupy movement (1)
Pakistan (4)
Palestine (1)
Philippines (1)
Piracy (2)
Poland (2)
Politics (59)
Pornography (7)
Power (60)
Privacy (23)
Protest (25)
Public Morality (26)
Race (1)
Radio (3)
Regulation (10)
Religion (28)
Reputation (17)
Right to information (57)
Russia (2)
Rwanda (1)
Satire (13)
Saudi Arabia (2)
Science (9)
Scientology (1)
Secrecy (1)
Singapore (2)
Social media (14)
South Africa (5)
Southeast Asia (3)
Surveillance (1)
Syria (1)
Technology (22)
Terrorism (5)
Thailand (1)
Tunisia (1)
Turkey (9)
Twitter (9)
Ukraine (1)
United Kingdom (14)
United States (20)
Violence (30)
Whistleblowing (3)
Wikileaks (1)
Wikipedia (2)
YouTube (1)

			
					« Monopoly is really dangerous for free speech »
				
Ana Kasparian of #yourMSC asks our director Timothy Garton Ash about Facebook, free speech and democracy at the Munich Security Conference 2019.

					Glasnost! Nine ways Facebook can make itself a better forum for free speech and democracy
				
Free Speech Debate co-authors an Oxford-Stanford report on Facebook.

					In defence of Europe’s memory laws
				
There are two exceptional cases in which memory laws protect free speech, argue Grażyna Baranowska and Anna Wójcik.

					Is there a universal right to free speech and what are its limits?
				
Timothy Garton Ash in conversation with Nigel Warburton, as part of the Philosophy in the Bookshop series at Blackwell’s, Oxford.

					Silencing 140 characters: free expression and the internet in the Gulf
				
A seminar run by the University of Oxford’s Middle East Centre and Free Speech Debate on Free Expression in the Gulf, with Maryam al-Khawaja (Gulf Centre for Human Rights), Toby Matthieson (St. Anthony’s College) and Nicholas McGeehan (Middle East Researcher, Human Rights Watch). Chaired by Timothy Garton Ash

					Ben Wizner, Edward Snowden’s lawyer: To what extent should government be allowed to curtail civil liberties for the sake of national security?
				
Ben Wizner, Edward Snowden’s ACLU lawyer, reflects on the state of and importance of the right to free speech in 2017. He argues we must not overuse the term ‘national security’ or surrender our right to privacy because we have nothing to hide, for we would not deny somebody the right to free speech because they had nothing to say.

					An introductory guide to the ten principles
				
Our social media team have created a new way to explore the 10 principles on Youtube.

					Luciano Floridi: What contribution can the philosophy of information make to our understanding of free speech?
				
Luciano Floridi, Professor at the Oxford Internet Institute of the University of Oxford, speaks to Free Speech Debate about the philosophy of information, European data protection, and contemporary challenges to free speech.

					What happened to ‘the right to be forgotten’?
				
Free Speech Debate tells the story of the advisory council to Google on the right to be forgotten, and talks to council member Luciano Floridi.

					Réputation
				
Nous devons êtres capables de protéger notre vie privée et riposter si nos réputations sont attaquées mais ne devons pas empêcher une inquisition quand elle est d’intérêt public.

					La vie privée
				
Nous devons êtres capables de protéger notre vie privée et riposter si nos réputations sont attaquées mais ne devons pas empêcher une inquisition quand elle est d’intérêt public.

					Should ‘revenge porn’ be illegal?
				
Max Harris explains how Britain legislated against it and compares this with the position in other common law countries

					What is it like to be a satirical cartoonist in Malaysia?
				
Malaysian cartoonist Zunar talks about what it means to be a satirical cartoonist in Malaysia.

					Google grapples with the ‘right to be forgotten’
				
Katie Engelhart attends the public hearing of Google’s Advisory Council, set up in response to a European Court of Justice judgement.

					Privacy: Sample our intellectual buffet. Or make your own meal.
				
Timothy Garton Ash introduces a sample tour of the content on our site

					A short history of disappearing privacy on Facebook
				
Since Facebook launched in 2005 its default privacy settings have undergone radical changes, giving more access to personal data than many are aware of. 

					US Supreme Court strikes down law creating ‘buffer zone’ around abortion clinics
				
In the case of McCullen v Coakley, the US Supreme Court issued a landmark ruling about restrictions on speech around abortion clinics.  Max Harris explains.

					How an attempt at ‘libel tourism’ rebounded on a Tanzanian tycoon
				
A British citizen blogged about a Tanzanian media magnate involved in throwing her and her husband off their Tanzanian farm. He sued for libel in a British court. Dominic Burbidge explains.

					National security and privacy: striking the balance
				
Anthony Lester and Zoe McCallum discuss the need to balance national security and privacy in the age of internet surveillance.

					Is it a crime to offend bread?
				
For one taxi company in the Russian town of Kostroma, the answer turned out to be yes. Sergey Fadeev explains.

					Can a law-abiding liberal democracy be Big Brother?
				
Jeff Howard explores the legal basis on which the US is collecting vast amounts of data on foreign and US citizens, despite the Fourth Amendment.

					L’Inde a-t-elle besoin de son enquête Leveson?
				
L’Inde possède son propre débat sur la régulation des médias. Arghya Sengupta évalue comment l’ombre des années 1970 dîtes ‘d’urgence’ plane toujours au-dessus de sa transition d’une auto-régulation ratée à une régulation statutaire.

					Quand et où les manifestations d’extrémistes devraient-elles être autorisées?
				
Des manifestations organisées par des groupes d’extrême droite dans des zones ethniquement diversifiées constituent une provocation, mais leur interdiction peut avoir des effets indésirables. Josh Black examine une interdiction de rassemblement de la Ligue de défense anglaise à l’Est de Londres.

					Is privacy getting lost in Google’s « cracks and crevices »?
				
A globally-effective privacy regime is a realistic goal, argues Ian Brown. But it needs giants like Google to get behind it.

					A right to privacy? Not at the expense of free speech!
				
Our user imos.org.uk argues with one of our draft principles challenging the idea that privacy is a condition for free speech.

					Quand le harcèlement en ligne mène au suicide
				
Le 10 octobre 2012, la jeune canadienne Amanda Todd se suicide après plusieurs années de harcèlement anonyme sur Internet. Judith Bruhn décrit cette affaire choquante.

					Le droit de mentir au sujet de son gouvernement?
				
En 1964, la cour suprême américaine affirma l’idée que la critique des représentants du gouvernement ne devrait jamais être punie, même si celle-ci repose sur des mensonges. Jeff Howard explique un cas d’école sur le premier amendement.

					The Nira Radia tapes controversy and the right to privacy
				
Should government-initiated phone hacking be made public if the recordings are in the public interest? Shubhangi Bhadada exposes the thin line in India between the right to privacy and freedom of expression.

					Former British agent, Annie Machon: What is the case for whistleblowing?
				
Former British MI5 agent Annie Machon revealed,  together with David Shayler,  alleged criminal behaviour within the agency. In an interview with Sebastian Huempfer she speaks about the need for official channels through which whistleblowers can voice their concerns.

					Un meurtrier mérite-t-il le droit d’être oublié?
				
En 2008, deux meurtriers condamnés demandèrent que leurs noms soient retirés de Wikipédia et d’autres médias en accord avec la législation allemande. Est ce que le droit de l’individu à être oublié prime sur le droit du public de savoir?

					Excès de zèle chez Facebook dans l’identification des visages
				
Est-ce-que Facebook devrait automatiquement suggérer l’identité des personnes sur une photo? Sebastian Huempfer pose la question de l’intrusion de Facebook dans la vie privée de ses utilisateurs.

					L’algorithme de Google peut-il salir la femme d’un homme politique?
				
En tapant ‘Bettina Wulff’, le nom de la femme d’un ancien président allemand, dans Google, la ‘fonction d’auto-suggestion’ ajoutera ‘escorte’. Sebastian Huempfer se demande si cet ajout algorithmique s’apparente à une forme de diffamation.

Recherche

Mon compte

Langue