Filtre par contributeur 'HEINZE Eric' qui a écrit 10 postes

Academia (2)
Access (18)
Africa (9)
Anonymity (8)
Antisemitism (1)
Arab Spring (5)
Art (14)
Article 19 (2)
Atheism (1)
Australia (4)
Blasphemy (16)
Blogger (4)
Books (2)
Brazil (4)
Buddhism (1)
Burma (2)
Canada (2)
Celebrity (5)
Censorship (33)
Charlie Hebdo (2)
Child abuse (1)
China (10)
Christianity (13)
Civility (33)
Colonialism (1)
Copyright (10)
Corruption (3)
Defamation (27)
Democracy (27)
Denialism (3)
Denmark (2)
Discrimination (9)
Education (19)
Egypt (1)
Europe (5)
Exclusion (1)
Facebook (4)
Film (1)
Finland (1)
France (8)
Freedom (44)
Genocide (7)
Germany (10)
Google (5)
Governance (10)
Hate speech (22)
Hinduism (1)
History (19)
Homosexuality (4)
Humour (2)
Hungary (1)
Hunger strike (1)
India (10)
Internet (43)
Internet companies (1)
Islam (17)
Israel (1)
Japan (2)
Journalism (25)
Kenya (3)
Knowledge (30)
Language (8)
Latin America (5)
Law (59)
Lese majesty (1)
Liberalism (14)
Libya (2)
Literature (3)
Media (49)
Memory laws (3)
Middle East (8)
Minorities (5)
Money (10)
Morality (9)
Multiculturalism (9)
National security (38)
Net neutrality (14)
Netherlands (2)
Norway (1)
Nudity (5)
Occupy movement (1)
Pakistan (4)
Palestine (1)
Philippines (1)
Piracy (2)
Poland (2)
Politics (59)
Pornography (7)
Power (60)
Privacy (23)
Protest (25)
Public Morality (26)
Race (1)
Radio (3)
Regulation (10)
Religion (28)
Reputation (17)
Right to information (57)
Russia (2)
Rwanda (1)
Satire (13)
Saudi Arabia (2)
Science (9)
Scientology (1)
Secrecy (1)
Singapore (2)
Social media (14)
South Africa (5)
Southeast Asia (3)
Surveillance (1)
Syria (1)
Technology (22)
Terrorism (5)
Thailand (1)
Tunisia (1)
Turkey (9)
Twitter (9)
Ukraine (1)
United Kingdom (14)
United States (20)
Violence (30)
Whistleblowing (3)
Wikileaks (1)
Wikipedia (2)
YouTube (1)

			
					Peeing on Pétain
				
Eric Heinze examines the boundary between civil disobedience and desecration.  

					Should governments butt out of history?
				
Eric Heinze examines how states limit speech in order to control public awareness about the past.

					What is ‘dehumanising’ speech?
				
Eric Heinze provocatively argues that no-platformers need to look into the mirror and examine their own blind spots. 

					Law and historical memory: theorising the discipline
				
Free expression should not be considered as ‘just another’ human right. Any truly participatory political system cannot exist without it nor any legal system linked to such politics, argues Eric Heinze.

					Are you sitting comfortably? How safe spaces became dangerous
				
We must distinguish between legitimate and illegitimate safe spaces, argues Eric Heinze.

					The left’s version of hate speech: guilt by association
				
Leftists who argue for hate speech bans ignore the far left’s own version, argues Eric Heinze.

					Israel, no-platforming – and why there’s no such thing as ‘narrow exceptions’ to campus free speech
				
Eric Heinze argues that it is contradictory to the principles of free speech to criticise the Israeli ambassador to Britain online and then no-platform him at a university talk.

					Free speech debates are more than ‘radicals’ vs ‘liberals’
				
Eric Heinze argues that the radicals and liberal grounds for free speech are not mutually exclusive.

					Ten arguments for – and against – ‘no-platforming’
				
Eric Heinze sets out the flaws in the commonly heard arguments for no-platforming.

					Nineteen arguments for hate speech bans – and against them
				
Free speech scholar Eric Heinze identifies the main arguments for laws restricting hate speech and says none are valid for mature Western democracies.

Recherche

Mon compte

Langue