Filtre par contributeur 'GHANEA Nazila' qui a écrit 2 postes menuTrouver des sujets par mot-clés Academia (2)Access (18)Africa (9)Anonymity (8)Antisemitism (1)Arab Spring (5)Art (14)Article 19 (2)Atheism (1)Australia (4)Blasphemy (16)Blogger (4)Books (2)Brazil (4)Buddhism (1)Burma (2)Canada (2)Celebrity (5)Censorship (33)Charlie Hebdo (2)Child abuse (1)China (10)Christianity (13)Civility (33)Colonialism (1)Copyright (10)Corruption (3)Defamation (27)Democracy (27)Denialism (3)Denmark (2)Discrimination (9)Education (19)Egypt (1)Europe (5)Exclusion (1)Facebook (4)Film (1)Finland (1)France (8)Freedom (44)Genocide (7)Germany (10)Google (5)Governance (10)Hate speech (22)Hinduism (1)History (19)Homosexuality (4)Humour (2)Hungary (1)Hunger strike (1)India (10)Internet (43)Internet companies (1)Islam (17)Israel (1)Japan (2)Journalism (25)Kenya (3)Knowledge (30)Language (8)Latin America (5)Law (59)Lese majesty (1)Liberalism (14)Libya (2)Literature (3)Media (49)Memory laws (3)Middle East (8)Minorities (5)Money (10)Morality (9)Multiculturalism (9)National security (38)Net neutrality (14)Netherlands (2)Norway (1)Nudity (5)Occupy movement (1)Pakistan (4)Palestine (1)Philippines (1)Piracy (2)Poland (2)Politics (59)Pornography (7)Power (60)Privacy (23)Protest (25)Public Morality (26)Race (1)Radio (3)Regulation (10)Religion (28)Reputation (17)Right to information (57)Russia (2)Rwanda (1)Satire (13)Saudi Arabia (2)Science (9)Scientology (1)Secrecy (1)Singapore (2)Social media (14)South Africa (5)Southeast Asia (3)Surveillance (1)Syria (1)Technology (22)Terrorism (5)Thailand (1)Tunisia (1)Turkey (9)Twitter (9)Ukraine (1)United Kingdom (14)United States (20)Violence (30)Whistleblowing (3)Wikileaks (1)Wikipedia (2)YouTube (1) Why defamation laws do not protect vulnerable holders of faith Three human rights experts scrutinise the defamation of religion, which they argue misses the point by protecting faith but not vulnerable believes How should the law define dangerous speech? A trio of human rights experts elaborate on the definition of dangerous speech and consider how hate speech is protected both in Europe and under the first amendment in the US.
Why defamation laws do not protect vulnerable holders of faith Three human rights experts scrutinise the defamation of religion, which they argue misses the point by protecting faith but not vulnerable believes
How should the law define dangerous speech? A trio of human rights experts elaborate on the definition of dangerous speech and consider how hate speech is protected both in Europe and under the first amendment in the US.