En 2010, la chanteuse polonaise Doda fut condamnée pour avoir ‘offensé des sentiments religieux’ après qu’elle ait déclaré croire davantage aux dinosaures qu’à la création telle que présentée dans la Bible. Annabelle Chapman étudie ce cas.
Exposition des faits
En 2009, Dorota Rabczewska alias Doda, une chanteuse populaire polonaise, participe à une entrevue avec un journal en ligne. Au cours de cette entrevue, elle dit croire davantage aux dinosaures qu’à la création telle que présentée dans la Bible. Elle expliqua qu’il était difficile de croire à quelque chose écrit par des gens qui avaient bu trop de vin et fumé trop de joints. Les déclarations de Doda déclenchèrent un soulèvement auprès de la population polonaise à dominance catholique mais les autorités judiciaires estimèrent qu’aucun action légale n’était nécessaire.
Néanmoins, à la suite de pressions de la part de groupes conservateurs, une enquête lancée en avril 2010, Doda fut accusée d’avoir “offensé des sentiments religieux par le recours à la calomnie publique d’un objet de croyance (dans ce cas-ci la Bible) sous l’article 196 du code pénal polonais. Deux experts de la Bible et un expert en linguistiques furent consultés pendant le procès pour déterminer si Doda avait réellement offensé un sentiment religieux. Le procès est toujours en cours mais la chanteuse pourrait écoper jusqu’à 2 ans d’emprisonnement.
reply report Report comment
The problem is much more complicated than described in case text. Doda’s reputation is well known in Poland, as she became famous for having an intercourse shown on TV (in bigbrother-like show called Bar) since then her career went on two ways: one widely promoted pop star, other a controversial celebrity.
The worth notifying moment of her career was engagement with frontman of black metal band. The mentioned Doda’s act took place after that – at the time of Doda being promoted in public media (which are under constant attack of both main sides of political scene in Poland and after each parliament elections are usually the first place of changes).
The Doda’s sue was just one of actions as crime notification (first step of lawsuit process) was sent by people associated with ultracatholic movement which also is a social fundament of second strongest party in Poland and biggest political opposition.
Obviously Doda should have been rather sued under the civil law than criminal.
reply report Report comment
I can tell what priests are saying in Poland in public, that Church is holy. This a begging and the end of any discussion. Lets not think about what Vatican or Church thinks because it will lead us nowhere and instead enforce respect for non-believers (thinkers).
reply report Report comment
If the CAtholic Church of Polaand deems that the singer maligned or questioned any story in the Bible, do they, the Church, not have faith in the Truth of its text? Why should the Truth be afraid or offended? But it appears rather that the Church is fearful that it is Doda who has the truth on her side. Of course the story of the creation of Adam and Eve is a fairy tale. But it is very poetic, and should be accepted and read as such. Has the Church ever explained why a rib?
reply report Report comment
I cannot see that such a factual statement should cause dismay, even among Christians. That dinosaurs existed is a fact of nature. The story of the creation of the universe as narrated in Genesis is open. The story of the creation of Adam and Eve is laughable nonsense. And similarly the stigma attached to every subsequent human being born by the supposed ‘original sin’ is a disgrace and an affront to human intelligence. The Church has come to accept that the Earth goes round the sun, and that man is not the special creation of God. When is it going to accept that the supposed Holy Ghost is a myth?
On the other hand, when Doda says: “It is hard to believe in something written by people who drank too much wine and smoked herbal cigarettes” , I counter by saying that that is no reason, or a test, for not believing what they say.
One of the main problems of free speech is posed by people who deliberately set out to offend and provoke others by their views. An honest expression of one’s views should always be met by an equally honest expression of opposite views.
Is the Church afraid that its Truth will turn out to be not the Truth?
reply report Report comment
The case is very simple. There should be no law against « religious feelings ». This « law » is a manipulation of a fact that there are no rational reasons to defend religious symbols. This platform can be a great tool to check where in Europe we have such absurd laws and advocate to rule them out as quickly as possible.
reply report Report comment
The main problem, Perogrullo dixit, is zero tolerance. The main solution, in this, as in other similar cases, will be, to teach non religiuos ethics during the first school years. My ideas is as good as impossible.
Arnoldo Kraus, Mexico
reply report Report comment
I don’t understand what you say. The religious people should be educated in ethics because they prosecute atheists and free thinkers and often kill them.