07Privacidad

Nosotros debemos poder ser capaces de proteger nuestra privacidad y enfrentar difamaciones a nuestras reputaciones, pero no evitar el escrutinio que es parte del interés público.

Academia (2)
Access (11)
Africa (6)
Anonymity (8)
Antisemitism (3)
Arab Spring (7)
Art (13)
Article 19 (2)
Atheism (1)
Australia (3)
Blasphemy (8)
Blogger (2)
Brazil (3)
Buddhism (2)
Burma (3)
Canada (3)
Celebrity (3)
Censorship (26)
Charlie Hebdo (2)
Child abuse (1)
China (6)
Christianity (9)
Civility (23)
Colonialism (1)
Copyright (5)
Corruption (2)
Defamation (20)
Democracy (18)
Denialism (1)
Denmark (2)
Discrimination (5)
Education (16)
Egypt (3)
Europe (4)
Facebook (4)
Film (1)
Finland (1)
France (7)
Freedom (32)
Gaza conflict (1)
Genocide (6)
Germany (5)
Google (4)
Governance (6)
Hate speech (17)
History (18)
Homosexuality (3)
Humour (2)
Hunger strike (1)
India (9)
Internet (30)
Islam (12)
Israel (2)
Japan (2)
Journalism (17)
Kenya (1)
Knowledge (22)
Language (6)
Latin America (4)
Law (44)
Lese majesty (1)
Liberalism (6)
Libya (2)
Literature (3)
Media (34)
Memory laws (3)
Middle East (6)
Minorities (2)
Money (3)
Morality (6)
Multiculturalism (6)
National security (26)
Net neutrality (9)
Netherlands (1)
New Zealand (1)
Norway (1)
Nudity (4)
Pakistan (1)
Palestine (2)
Philippines (1)
Poland (2)
Politics (36)
Pornography (11)
Power (39)
Privacy (20)
Propaganda (1)
Protest (15)
Public Morality (27)
Race (1)
Radio (2)
Regulation (7)
Religion (23)
Reputation (13)
Right to information (38)
Russia (3)
Rwanda (1)
Satire (8)
Science (6)
Scientology (1)
Secrecy (1)
Singapore (1)
Snowden (1)
Social media (12)
South Africa (4)
Southeast Asia (2)
Surveillance (2)
Syria (1)
Technology (21)
Terrorism (2)
Thailand (1)
Tunisia (1)
Turkey (2)
Twitter (6)
United Kingdom (15)
United States (8)
Violence (21)
Whistleblowing (3)
Wikipedia (3)
YouTube (1)

			
					«Monopoly is really dangerous for free speech»
				
Ana Kasparian of #yourMSC asks our director Timothy Garton Ash about Facebook, free speech and democracy at the Munich Security Conference 2019.

					Glasnost! Nine ways Facebook can make itself a better forum for free speech and democracy
				
Free Speech Debate co-authors an Oxford-Stanford report on Facebook.

					In defence of Europe’s memory laws
				
There are two exceptional cases in which memory laws protect free speech, argue Grażyna Baranowska and Anna Wójcik.

					Is there a universal right to free speech and what are its limits?
				
Timothy Garton Ash in conversation with Nigel Warburton, as part of the Philosophy in the Bookshop series at Blackwell’s, Oxford.

					Silencing 140 characters: free expression and the internet in the Gulf
				
A seminar run by the University of Oxford’s Middle East Centre and Free Speech Debate on Free Expression in the Gulf, with Maryam al-Khawaja (Gulf Centre for Human Rights), Toby Matthieson (St. Anthony’s College) and Nicholas McGeehan (Middle East Researcher, Human Rights Watch). Chaired by Timothy Garton Ash

					Ben Wizner, Edward Snowden’s lawyer: To what extent should government be allowed to curtail civil liberties for the sake of national security?
				
Ben Wizner, Edward Snowden’s ACLU lawyer, reflects on the state of and importance of the right to free speech in 2017. He argues we must not overuse the term ‘national security’ or surrender our right to privacy because we have nothing to hide, for we would not deny somebody the right to free speech because they had nothing to say.

					An introductory guide to the ten principles
				
Our social media team have created a new way to explore the 10 principles on Youtube.

					Luciano Floridi: What contribution can the philosophy of information make to our understanding of free speech?
				
Luciano Floridi, Professor at the Oxford Internet Institute of the University of Oxford, speaks to Free Speech Debate about the philosophy of information, European data protection, and contemporary challenges to free speech.

					What happened to ‘the right to be forgotten’?
				
Free Speech Debate tells the story of the advisory council to Google on the right to be forgotten, and talks to council member Luciano Floridi.

					Reputación
				
Nosotros debemos poder ser capaces de proteger nuestra privacidad y enfrentar difamaciones a nuestras reputaciones, pero no evitar el escrutinio que es parte del interés público.

					Privacidad
				
Nosotros debemos poder ser capaces de proteger nuestra privacidad y enfrentar difamaciones a nuestras reputaciones, pero no evitar el escrutinio que es parte del interés público.

					¿Debería ser ilegal la “porno venganza”?
				
Max Harris explica cómo ha legislado Gran Bretaña en contra de la “porno venganza” y lo compara con la posición de otros países de derecho común.

					What is it like to be a satirical cartoonist in Malaysia?
				
Malaysian cartoonist Zunar talks about what it means to be a satirical cartoonist in Malaysia.

					Google grapples with the ‘right to be forgotten’
				
Katie Engelhart attends the public hearing of Google’s Advisory Council, set up in response to a European Court of Justice judgement.

					Privacy: Sample our intellectual buffet. Or make your own meal.
				
Timothy Garton Ash introduces a sample tour of the content on our site

					A short history of disappearing privacy on Facebook
				
Since Facebook launched in 2005 its default privacy settings have undergone radical changes, giving more access to personal data than many are aware of. 

					US Supreme Court strikes down law creating ‘buffer zone’ around abortion clinics
				
In the case of McCullen v Coakley, the US Supreme Court issued a landmark ruling about restrictions on speech around abortion clinics.  Max Harris explains.

					How an attempt at ‘libel tourism’ rebounded on a Tanzanian tycoon
				
A British citizen blogged about a Tanzanian media magnate involved in throwing her and her husband off their Tanzanian farm. He sued for libel in a British court. Dominic Burbidge explains.

					National security and privacy: striking the balance
				
Anthony Lester and Zoe McCallum discuss the need to balance national security and privacy in the age of internet surveillance.

					Is it a crime to offend bread?
				
For one taxi company in the Russian town of Kostroma, the answer turned out to be yes. Sergey Fadeev explains.

					Can a law-abiding liberal democracy be Big Brother?
				
Jeff Howard explores the legal basis on which the US is collecting vast amounts of data on foreign and US citizens, despite the Fourth Amendment.

					¿Necesita la India su informe Leveson?
				
Arghya Sengupta analiza el intenso debate sobre la regulación de los medios al que se enfrenta la India, y la sombra del “Estado de emergencia” de la década de 1970 que se cierne sobre las diferentes alternativas, desde la fallida autorregulación a una propuesta de ley para crear un organismo supervisor de la prensa.

					When and where should extremists be allowed to march?
				
Protests held by far right groups in ethnically diverse areas are provocation, but banning them can have undesired effects. Josh Black looks at a ban on the English Defence League in East London.

					Is privacy getting lost in Google’s «cracks and crevices»?
				
A globally-effective privacy regime is a realistic goal, argues Ian Brown. But it needs giants like Google to get behind it.

					¿Un derecho a la privacidad? No a las expensas de la libertad de expresión!
				
Nuestro usuario imos.org.uk discute con uno de nuestros cuatro principios cuestionando la idea de que la privacidad es una condición para que haya libertad de expresión. 

					Una intimidación cibernética que condujo a un suicidio
				
El 10 de octubre de 2012, la adolescente canadiense Amanda Todd se suicidó luego de años de intimidación y acoso cibernético. Judith Bruhn describe un impactante caso.

					¿Existe un derecho a mentir sobre el gobierno?
				
En el caso hito del New York Times v. Sullivan, en 1964, la Corte Suprema de Estados Unidos decidió que la crítica a oficiales públicos debe ser protegida, incluso si algunas de las aseveraciones son inexactas. Jeff Howard explica el caso.

					The Nira Radia tapes controversy and the right to privacy
				
Should government-initiated phone hacking be made public if the recordings are in the public interest? Shubhangi Bhadada exposes the thin line in India between the right to privacy and freedom of expression.

					Former British agent, Annie Machon: What is the case for whistleblowing?
				
Former British MI5 agent Annie Machon revealed,  together with David Shayler,  alleged criminal behaviour within the agency. In an interview with Sebastian Huempfer she speaks about the need for official channels through which whistleblowers can voice their concerns.

					¿Tiene un asesino el derecho a ser olvidado?
				
En el 2008 dos asesinos condenados pidieron que sus nombres fueran removidos de Wikipedia y de otros medios de comunicación en línea, de acuerdo con la ley Alemana ¿Debería tener prioridad el derecho de un individuo a ser olvidado sobre el derecho del público a saber?

					El excesivo etiquetado de personas de Facebook
				
¿Debe Facebook sugerir automáticamente quien aparece en una foto? Sebastian Huempfer pregunta si el software de etiquetado de fotos de Facebook infringe la privacidad de los usuarios.

					¿Puede el algoritmo de Google calumniar la esposa de un político?
				
Escribe ‘Bettina Wulff’, el nombre de la esposa de un ex presidente Aleman, en Google y la función de autocompletar incluye “acompañante” ¿Es esta adición del algoritmo una forma de difamación? Sebastian Huempfer explora el caso.

Buscar

Tu cuenta

Idioma