Filtrar por categoría 'Hate speech' que contengan 153 posts

Academia (2)
Access (11)
Africa (6)
Anonymity (8)
Antisemitism (3)
Arab Spring (7)
Art (13)
Article 19 (2)
Atheism (1)
Australia (3)
Blasphemy (8)
Blogger (2)
Brazil (3)
Buddhism (2)
Burma (3)
Canada (3)
Celebrity (3)
Censorship (26)
Charlie Hebdo (2)
Child abuse (1)
China (6)
Christianity (9)
Civility (23)
Colonialism (1)
Copyright (5)
Corruption (2)
Defamation (20)
Democracy (18)
Denialism (1)
Denmark (2)
Discrimination (5)
Education (16)
Egypt (3)
Europe (4)
Facebook (4)
Film (1)
Finland (1)
France (7)
Freedom (32)
Gaza conflict (1)
Genocide (6)
Germany (5)
Google (4)
Governance (6)
Hate speech (17)
History (18)
Homosexuality (3)
Humour (2)
Hunger strike (1)
India (9)
Internet (30)
Islam (12)
Israel (2)
Japan (2)
Journalism (17)
Kenya (1)
Knowledge (22)
Language (6)
Latin America (4)
Law (44)
Lese majesty (1)
Liberalism (6)
Libya (2)
Literature (3)
Media (34)
Memory laws (3)
Middle East (6)
Minorities (2)
Money (3)
Morality (6)
Multiculturalism (6)
National security (26)
Net neutrality (9)
Netherlands (1)
New Zealand (1)
Norway (1)
Nudity (4)
Pakistan (1)
Palestine (2)
Philippines (1)
Poland (2)
Politics (36)
Pornography (11)
Power (39)
Privacy (20)
Propaganda (1)
Protest (15)
Public Morality (27)
Race (1)
Radio (2)
Regulation (7)
Religion (23)
Reputation (13)
Right to information (38)
Russia (3)
Rwanda (1)
Satire (8)
Science (6)
Scientology (1)
Secrecy (1)
Singapore (1)
Snowden (1)
Social media (12)
South Africa (4)
Southeast Asia (2)
Surveillance (2)
Syria (1)
Technology (21)
Terrorism (2)
Thailand (1)
Tunisia (1)
Turkey (2)
Twitter (6)
United Kingdom (15)
United States (8)
Violence (21)
Whistleblowing (3)
Wikipedia (3)
YouTube (1)

			
					Art with the ‘courage of thought’ is the best response to ‘hate speech’
				
Hungarian academic and performer Peter Molnar explains the importance of Gondolatbátorság to his ‘Hate Speech’ Monologues.

					The left’s version of hate speech: guilt by association
				
Leftists who argue for hate speech bans ignore the far left’s own version, argues Eric Heinze.

					An insistent effort by the Hrant Dink Foundation against hate speech in Turkey
				
Pınar Ensari and Funda Tekin explain the work of the Hrant Dink Foundation in countering hate speech in Turkey.

					An introductory guide to the ten principles
				
Our social media team have created a new way to explore the 10 principles on Youtube.

					From censorship by government to censorship by terrorism
				
Paul Cliteur and Tom Herrenberg, editors of a book on The Fall and Rise of Blasphemy Law, consider the changing nature of censorship.

					Is dangerous speech free speech?
				
Expression can be dangerous, but that should not necessarily make it a crime. Jeffrey Howard evaluates the best argument for banning hate speech. 

					The ‘lying press’ and the crisis of confidence in German media
				
Maja Sojref and Sarah Glatte explore the growing public disillusionment with the mainstream press in Germany.

					Why is Mein Kampf the 12th most sold history book on Amazon India?
				
Udit Bhatia discusses attitudes to, and ignorance of Hitler in India.

					When is speech dangerous?
				
Jonathan Leader Maynard examines the difficulties in assessing and managing the role of speech in violence.

					‘No-platforming’ on university campuses: political correctness and the subversion of free speech
				
Monica Richter argues that no-platforming is more about censoring unpalatable views than protecting marginalised groups.

					Don’t ban no-platforming
				
Sizwe Mpofu-Walsh argues that no-platforming is an expressive act that can expand the field of debate, rather than the denial of free speech.

					Ten arguments for – and against – ‘no-platforming’
				
Eric Heinze sets out the flaws in the commonly heard arguments for no-platforming.

					Why people shouldn’t feel the need to censor themselves
				
Roger Scruton argues that self-censorship can be as much a threat to free speech as its government equivalent.

					Why ‘no-platforming’ those who peddle hate speech does not pose a free speech issue
				
Purushottam Vikas engages with criticisms directed at a controversial petition regarding an Oxford India Society speaking event.

					Rae Langton: Why an understanding of silence is important to free speech debates
				
In this interview for Free Speech Debate, renowned Philosophy Professor Rae Langton speaks about the value of philosophy for our understanding of free speech and discusses aspects of her work on pornography and the silencing of women. 

					What is right speech and why is it important?
				
Leslie Green argues that Buddhist ideas  about avoiding divisive, abusive and  false speech can help us live together well in free societies

					Living in outrageous times
				
Peter Bradley argues that we should tolerate offence but be less offensive

					A landmark Canadian hate speech case: Her Majesty the Queen v Keegstra
				
In 1990, the Supreme Court of Canada issued a famous ruling in a case involving a high school teacher and alleged anti-Semitism.  Max Harris explains.

					EU versus intellectual freedom?
				
In a bid to synchronise hate crimes, the EU is seeking unity amongst members states against the denial of historical injustices. Is this the EU versus member states’ appreciation of intellectual freedom? Luigi Cajani explains.

					Eatock vs Bolt: un caso Australiano controversial sobre el discurso del odio
				
Max Harris explica por qué el periodista Andrew Bolt fue encontrado en violación del Acta Australiana de Discriminación Racial por artículos sobre “los Aborígenes de piel clara”.

					Nineteen arguments for hate speech bans – and against them
				
Free speech scholar Eric Heinze identifies the main arguments for laws restricting hate speech and says none are valid for mature Western democracies.  

					Regulating hate speech: lessons for Asia
				
Cherian George on how hate speech is gaining virulence in Asian countries such as Myanmar, and how peace-building workshops represent a positive step forward.  

					From incitement to self-censorship: the media in the Kenyan elections of 2007 and 2013
				
Katherine Bruce-Lockhart looks at the media’s role in two Kenyan elections and argues that peace and critical media coverage should not be mutually exclusive. 

					“Usaron el horno para broncearse, sabes…”
				
Marc-Antoine Dilhac cuenta como él enfrentó el prejuicio anti-semita en un salón de clases Francés, y argumenta que el debate abierto sobre los discursos de odio trae más beneficios que aquellos que se derivan de prohibirlos.

					Martha Nussbaum: How can we best approach the challenge of religious difference?
				
Legal philosopher Martha Nussbaum gave the 2013 Dahrendorf Lecture, exploring how to live with religious diversity.

					La diferencia entre genocidio y crímenes contra la humanidad
				
Regularmente resaltamos aquellos comentarios que nos han dejado alguna impresión. Antoon de Baets dejó una respuesta reveladora sobre el debate de Josie Appleton sobre las leyes de memoria en Francia.

					Free Speech Bites
				
Nigel Warburton spoke with Timothy Garton Ash for Index on Censorship’s Free Speech Bites about the Free Speech Debate Project and global free speech standards.

					¿Cuándo se hace peligroso el discurso de incitación al odio? Tome en cuenta a Kenia y Ruanda
				
El venidero juicio contra el locutor Joshua Arap Sang plantea importantes interrogantes sobre las conexiones entre las palabras y la violencia, alega Katherine Bruce-Lockhart.

					Las repetidas condenas de Brigitte Bardot por incitar odio racial
				
¿Se debería permitir a una actriz de fama mundial denunciar la “sobrepoblación” por extranjeros? Por Michèle Finck.

					Taming the gods: How should we deal with religious threats to free speech?
				
At the 2013 Jaipur Festival, Ian Buruma, Reza Aslan, Ahdaf Souief and Timothy Garton Ash, in conversation with Shoma Chaudhury, talk about the relationship between religion and politics and how to deal with religious threats to free speech.

					Is the ‘hands-off’ internet different to internet freedom?
				
At the invitation of Index of Censorship and the Editors Guild of India, Timothy Garton Ash joins Kirsty Hughes at a panel discussion in Delhi with Shri Ajit Balakrishnan, Shri Sunil Abraham and Ramajit Singh Chima. 

					El futuro de la libertad de expresión
				
El activista de derechos humanos Aryeh Neier habla sobre el futuro de la libertad de expresión.

					Ayreh Neier: Why free speech is important in averting atrocities
				
Aryeh Neier, human rights lawyer and president emeritus of the Open Society Foundations speaks about the future of free speech.

					Las razones por las cuales Ruanda y Libia necesitan libertad de expresión y regulación de los medios
				
Jerry Timmins describe un nuevo reportaje sobre los medios de dos sociedades en período de postconflicto y alega que países como Gran Bretaña deberían hacer más para apoyarles.

					Prevent harm, allow offence?
				
Robert Simpson suggests a way to distinguish between harm and offence.

					Reader’s comment
				
We regularly highlight comments that have made an impression on us. Today’s comes from user Martinned responding to Brian Pellot’s discussion piece on the Innocence of Muslims controversy. 

					What are the biggest debates concerning Islam and free speech?
				
FSD’s Katie Engelhart sat in on this Frontline Club debate to discuss controversy surrounding the YouTube video Innocence of Muslims. 

					Has Innocence of Muslims ended the innocence of YouTube?
				
Join us to debate the role internet platforms like YouTube should play in setting free speech agendas in your country, your language and across the world. Online editor Brian Pellot kicks off the discussion. 

					Combatting hate speech in the Turkish media
				
The Hrant Dink Foundation has run the Media Watch on Hate Speech project since 2009 to counter racist and discriminatory discourse in Turkish press. Project coordinators Melisa Akan and Nuran Agan explain the initiative.

					Censoring a billion voices to save a nation
				
Manav Bhushan, an Indian member of the Free Speech Debate team, makes the case for blocking hate-filled websites in his country.

					Katalin Barsony on empowering Roma with technology
				
Romedia Foundation aims to disseminate an insider’s view of Romani issues, empower Romani activists and challenge stereotypes through new media.

					Cuando un iPhone puede ser peligroso
				
La velocidad y ubicuidad de los dispositivos móviles ha cambiado el contexto del “discurso de incitación al odio” en Internet, escribe Peter Molnar.

					¿Por qué la “maquinaria armonizadora” de la Unión Europea debería mantenerse alejada de la historia?
				
Claus Leggewie y Horst Meier explican porqué las leyes sobre la memoria son el camino equivocado para recordar y debatir el difícil pasado de los europeos.

					Elif Shafak habla sobre nuestra humanidad común
				
La escritora turca de reconocido prestigio, Elif Shafak, habla de los límites de la libertad de expresión, el cosmopolitismo de sus novelas y el arte de la convivencia.

					Dispárale al bóer: ¿música de odio?
				
En 2011, una corte surafricana prohibió la canción anti-apartheid Dispárale al bóer, luego de dictaminar que era un discurso de incitación al odio, escribe Nimi Hoffmann.

					La Iglesia Bautista de Westboro: ¿Derecho a la libertad de expresión?
				
En 2011, el Tribunal Supremo de los EE.UU. se pronunció a favor del derecho de una Iglesia anti-homosexual a protestar en funerales militares. Un caso de Casey Selwyn.

					Japan: Korean ‘comfort women’ photo exhibit sabotaged
				
A South Korean photographer explains his ordeal in holding an exhibition in Japan that documents ageing ‘Comfort Women’, writes Lee Yoo Eun.

					¿Por qué ha de ser Amazon quien determine nuestros gustos y moral?
				
La tienda online ha recibido críticas por beneficiarse con libros electrónicos sobre terror o violencia. Jo Glanville sostiene que nadie debe decirnos qué leer.

					Free speech in an unfair world
				
Free Speech Debate’s 10 draft principles benefit those in positions of privilege and power, writes Sebastian Huempfer.

					Why hate speech should not be banned
				
Restrictions on hate speech are not a means of tackling bigotry but of rebranding often obnoxious ideas or arguments are immoral, argues writer Kenan Malik.

					La ética de los medios de comunicación y el juicio de Anders Behring Breivik
				
El testimonio del asesino Anders Behring Breivik debería transmitirse en vivo para disuadir el extremismo, argumenta Anne Ardem, editora ejecutiva de la NRK, compañía de medios estatal noruega.

					Free speech in Turkey & the world – part two
				
Historian Halil Berktay discusses the denial by the Turkish state that the mass murders of hundreds of thousands of Armenians in 1915 constituted a genocide.

					Free speech in Turkey & the world – part one
				
In the first past of this debate, research fellow Kerem Öktem argues that an individual’s understanding of free speech is shaped by their personal history and geography. 

					Shami Chakrabarti: Why robust civility works from an ethical but not from a legal perspective
				
The director of civil liberties group Liberty calls for a review of all speech crime legislation in the UK.

					Why defamation laws do not protect vulnerable holders of faith
				
Three human rights experts scrutinise the defamation of religion, which they argue misses the point by protecting faith but not vulnerable believes

					The harms of hate speech legislation
				
Hate speech legislation chills freedom of expression more than it protects vulnerable minorities.  Free speech lawyer Ivan Hare takes issue with Jeremy Waldron.

					Susan Benesch: What is the difference between hate speech and dangerous speech?
				
Susan Benesch, senior fellow at the World Policy Institute, discusses hate speech and dangerous speech with Timothy Garton Ash

					El predicador contra la homosexualidad
				
En Octubre del 2001, un predicador Cristiano Evangélico llamado Harry Hammond sostuvo un cartel diciendo “Paren la Inmoralidad, Paren la Homosexualidad, Paren el Lesbianismo.” Cuando Hammond se rehusó a detenerse, un policía lo arrestó. Timothy Garton Ash discute un caso ilustrativo.

					Ezra Levant: «I don’t believe hate speech is a crime»
				
«If you don’t ever feel hate, you have a broken personality,» says Canadian lawyer and publisher Ezra Levant. 

					Los daños del discurso del odio
				
Jeremy Waldron, profesor de teoría política y social en la Universidad de Oxford, argumenta a favor de la legislación contra el discurso del odio.

					How should the law define dangerous speech?
				
A trio of human rights experts elaborate on the definition of dangerous speech and consider how hate speech is protected both in Europe and under the first amendment in the US. 

					El Islam entre la libertad de expresión y el discurso del odio
				
La ejecución de apóstatas debe ser anulada pero insultar la religión debería ser reconocido como un crimen, escribe el clérigo Mohsen Kadivar.

					Irshad Manji on Allah, Liberty and Love: Why offence is a sign of truly free speech
				
The director of the Moral Courage Project says so-called ‘respect’ for Muslims is often lined with fear and «low expectations» of those practising the faith.

					Can Europe and the Middle East agree on the terms of freedom of expression?
				
A lecture by Timothy Garton Ash in Egypt at the AUC New Cairo.

					How Turkish taboos perpetuate immaturity
				
Professor Ayşe Kadıoğlu of Sabancı University speaks of her experience growing up in Turkey where taboos, many imposed by law, have trapped citizens «in a state of immaturity».

					Geert Wilders on trial
				
In 2011, Dutch right-wing politician Geert Wilders was cleared of charges of group defamation, incitement to hatred and discrimination against Muslims. Rutger Kaput looks at the case.

					Aryeh Neier: Why more speech is the cure to bad speech
				
The president of the Open Society Foundations talks about free speech as a universal aspiration, group libel and the Skokie controversy.

Buscar

Tu cuenta

Idioma