Filtrar por contribuidor 'KAMPFNER John' quien ha escrito 1 posts menuEncuentra temas usando palabras claves Academia (2)Access (11)Africa (6)Anonymity (8)Antisemitism (3)Arab Spring (7)Art (13)Article 19 (2)Atheism (1)Australia (3)Blasphemy (8)Blogger (2)Brazil (3)Buddhism (2)Burma (3)Canada (3)Celebrity (3)Censorship (26)Charlie Hebdo (2)Child abuse (1)China (6)Christianity (9)Civility (23)Colonialism (1)Copyright (5)Corruption (2)Defamation (20)Democracy (18)Denialism (1)Denmark (2)Discrimination (5)Education (16)Egypt (3)Europe (4)Facebook (4)Film (1)Finland (1)France (7)Freedom (32)Gaza conflict (1)Genocide (6)Germany (5)Google (4)Governance (6)Hate speech (17)History (18)Homosexuality (3)Humour (2)Hunger strike (1)India (9)Internet (30)Islam (12)Israel (2)Japan (2)Journalism (17)Kenya (1)Knowledge (22)Language (6)Latin America (4)Law (44)Lese majesty (1)Liberalism (6)Libya (2)Literature (3)Media (34)Memory laws (3)Middle East (6)Minorities (2)Money (3)Morality (6)Multiculturalism (6)National security (26)Net neutrality (9)Netherlands (1)New Zealand (1)Norway (1)Nudity (4)Pakistan (1)Palestine (2)Philippines (1)Poland (2)Politics (36)Pornography (11)Power (39)Privacy (20)Propaganda (1)Protest (15)Public Morality (27)Race (1)Radio (2)Regulation (7)Religion (23)Reputation (13)Right to information (38)Russia (3)Rwanda (1)Satire (8)Science (6)Scientology (1)Secrecy (1)Singapore (1)Snowden (1)Social media (12)South Africa (4)Southeast Asia (2)Surveillance (2)Syria (1)Technology (21)Terrorism (2)Thailand (1)Tunisia (1)Turkey (2)Twitter (6)United Kingdom (15)United States (8)Violence (21)Whistleblowing (3)Wikipedia (3)YouTube (1) Los periodistas no tienen un derecho divino a invadir la privacidad El principal experto sobre la libertad de expresión Eric Barendt defiende un reporte parlamentario en Gran Bretaña sobre la privacidad, de las críticas del periodista activista John Kampfner.
Los periodistas no tienen un derecho divino a invadir la privacidad El principal experto sobre la libertad de expresión Eric Barendt defiende un reporte parlamentario en Gran Bretaña sobre la privacidad, de las críticas del periodista activista John Kampfner.