Skip to main content
  • العربية
  • Deutsch
  • English
  • Español
  • فارسی
  • Français
  • हिन्दी
  • 日本語
  • Português
  • Русский
  • Türkçe
  • اردو
  • 简体中文
Free Speech Debate searchSearch the site
  • Countries
  • Topics
  • Contributors
  • Read & Discuss
  • Watch & Listen
  • About
    • The project
    • Our team
    • Our advisers
    • Funders and partners
    • Community standards
    • Contact us
    • In the media
  • micPodcast
  • searchSearch the site
  • account_circleYour account

Content related to Austria

Is the European Court of Human Rights merely defending the uncontroversial?

A famous case of state censorship in Austria highlights the tendency of governments to pander to the majority, leaving controversial views unprotected. By Michele Finck.

Why the EU’s “harmonisation machine” should stay away from history

Claus Leggewie and Horst Meier explain why memory laws are the wrong way for Europeans to remember and debate their difficult pasts.

What's missing?

Is there a vital area we have not addressed? A principle 11? An illuminating case study? Read other people’s suggestions and add your own here. Or start the debate in your own language.

Get involved

Free Speech Debate is a research project of the Dahrendorf Programme for the Study of Freedom at St Antony's College in the University of Oxford. www.freespeechdebate.ox.ac.uk

The University of Oxford
About Free Speech Debate

Free Speech Debate is a research project of the Dahrendorf Programme for the Study of Freedom at St Antony's College in the University of Oxford.

Read more
  • Terms of use
  • Copyright & attribution
  • Accessibility
  • Privacy
  • Cookies
  • Follow on Twitter
  • micPodcast
  • searchSearch the site
  • account_circleYour account
The University of Oxford

Search

Your account

Register

Language

  • العربية
  • Deutsch
  • English
  • Español
  • فارسی
  • Français
  • हिन्दी
  • 日本語
  • Português
  • Русский
  • Türkçe
  • اردو
  • 简体中文