انتقاء بحسب التصنيف 'History' تحتوي 118 منشورات menuالبحث عن المواضيع باستخدام الكلمة المفتاح Academia (1)Access (7)Africa (4)Anonymity (5)Antisemitism (3)Arab Spring (5)Art (9)Article 19 (1)Atheism (2)Australia (2)Blasphemy (14)Blogger (4)Brazil (2)Buddhism (1)Burma (1)Canada (3)Celebrity (3)Censorship (19)Charlie Hebdo (1)China (5)Christianity (7)Civility (27)Colonialism (1)Copyright (1)Corruption (1)Defamation (18)Democracy (13)Denialism (2)Denmark (1)Discrimination (6)Education (8)Egypt (3)Europe (2)Exclusion (1)Facebook (1)Film (1)France (5)Freedom (29)Gaza conflict (1)Genocide (2)Germany (2)Google (4)Governance (8)Hate speech (12)History (13)Homosexuality (2)Humour (2)Hunger strike (1)India (4)Internet (25)Internet companies (1)Islam (14)Israel (2)Japan (2)Journalism (17)Kenya (1)Knowledge (17)Language (6)Latin America (3)Law (31)Lese majesty (1)Liberalism (8)Literature (2)Media (26)Memory laws (1)Middle East (8)Minorities (2)Money (2)Morality (3)Multiculturalism (4)National security (25)Net neutrality (9)Netherlands (2)New Zealand (1)Nudity (4)Pakistan (3)Palestine (2)Poland (1)Politics (32)Pornography (5)Power (31)Privacy (14)Protest (12)Public Morality (23)Race (1)Radio (1)Regulation (2)Religion (22)Reputation (13)Right to information (28)Russia (1)Satire (9)Saudi Arabia (1)Science (3)Scientology (1)Secrecy (1)Snowden (1)Social media (10)South Africa (4)Southeast Asia (1)Surveillance (2)Technology (15)Terrorism (3)Thailand (1)Tunisia (1)Turkey (4)Twitter (6)Ukraine (1)United Kingdom (8)United States (10)Violence (22)Whistleblowing (3)Wikileaks (1)Wikipedia (1) Peeing on Pétain Eric Heinze examines the boundary between civil disobedience and desecration. Should governments butt out of history? Eric Heinze examines how states limit speech in order to control public awareness about the past. ‘Lenin-fall’: free speech and the politics of memory in Ukraine O.T. Jones argues that the Ukrainian state should not restrict open historical debate but use its ‘expressive’ powers to foster a nuanced understanding of the past. Law and historical memory: theorising the discipline Free expression should not be considered as ‘just another’ human right. Any truly participatory political system cannot exist without it nor any legal system linked to such politics, argues Eric Heinze. In defence of Europe’s memory laws There are two exceptional cases in which memory laws protect free speech, argue Grażyna Baranowska and Anna Wójcik. Free speech debates are more than ‘radicals’ vs ‘liberals’ Eric Heinze argues that the radicals and liberal grounds for free speech are not mutually exclusive. What next for Rhodes Must Fall? Free Speech Debate organised a panel discussion on the Rhodes Must Fall campaign and its future. In this video and its highlights, panelists debate the range of issues surrounding the campaign and its impact on free speech. Panelists include Dr David Johnson, Professor David Priestland, Sizwe Mpofu-Walsh and Monica Richter. When is speech dangerous? Jonathan Leader Maynard examines the difficulties in assessing and managing the role of speech in violence. ‘Oxford University has no regard for black life’ Sizwe Mpofu-Walsh argues that Oxford has shown itself to have no regard for black life in its decision not to remove the statue of Cecil Rhodes. Cecil Rhodes in Oxford: from unnoticed statue to political scapegoat Monica Richter argues that the inward looking Rhodes Must Fall campaign detracts from greater issues of social justice. هل اتسمت سياسة فرنسا بالنفاق حيال حرية التعبير؟ في ظل اغتيالات شارلي إيبدو، يفحص آرثر الصرّاف التاريخ الاستعماري الفرنسي المتّسم بالمعايير المزدوجة في الجزائر. الجاهلون في غزّة: الإعلام الغربي والصراع العربي-الإسرائيلي جون لويد يخوض في تاريخ وضعف تغطية الإعلام الغربي ويقترح طريقاً يمكن أن يحسّنها. A new initiative to defend free speech in India Hartosh Bal explains the role of the new Freedom Trust in the context of India’s media environment, and how they hope to defend freedom of expression. Salman Rushdie: What have been the most important changes to free speech in the last 25 years? 25 years after the fatwa and the fall of the Berlin Wall, Salman Rushdie discusses with Timothy Garton Ash whether there is now more or less freedom of expression in Europe, worrying developments in India and his critical view of Edward Snowden. Should Europe introduce a right to blasphemy? Alain Bouldoires talks to Timothy Garton Ash about the survival of blasphemy laws in Europe, and calls for a ‘right to blaspheme’. EU versus intellectual freedom? In a bid to synchronise hate crimes, the EU is seeking unity amongst members states against the denial of historical injustices. Is this the EU versus member states’ appreciation of intellectual freedom? Luigi Cajani explains. The world through the eyes of Russian state television Robert Coalson looks at how Russian television depicts everything from the crisis in Ukraine to the war in Syria. The long struggle to bury speech crimes in the English-speaking world Anthony Lester and Zoe McCallum look at how the ghost of the English Court of the Star Chamber has been used to suppress free speech. Ann Wright: Is secrecy necessary for peace and diplomacy? Former US Diplomat Ann Wright speaks to Kim Wilkinson on the need for whistleblowers and institutions like WikiLeaks, but stresses that in some instances secrecy is necessary, such as in peace-making negotiations. The importance of speaking Catalan Pere Vilanova reflects on his personal experience of learning his ‘native’ tongue – as a third language. ’استعملوا الفرن للحصول على سمرة البحر، كما تعلمون…‘ يستعيد مارك-أنطوان ديلاك كيف واجه تعصباً معادياً للسامية في صف فرنسي، ويحاجج بأن خيراً أكبر يأتي من نقاش حر حول خطاب الكراهية بالمقارنة مع حظره. Germans are not especially concerned about privacy and sovereignty Nazi past? Stasi past? Sebastian Huempfer challenges the conventional explanations for Germany’s strong reaction to Edward Snowden’s revelations about NSA snooping. What does George Orwell mean to people in Burma? At the 2013 Irrawaddy Literary Festival, Burmese writers including Pascal Khoo Thwe and blogpoet Pandora talk about George Orwell in the country where he was once an imperial policeman. Why the US needs more open debate about its failures on race Celebrating the 50th anniversary of the March on Washington must be the beginning of the discussion of race, not the end. Bassam Gergi discusses why the depoliticisation of race in the US is problematic and only open debate can lead to progress. Why shouldn’t a Hungarian historian call Jobbik “neo-nazi”? Tamás Szigeti explores the asymmetric narrowing of free speech in Hungary. The difference between genocide and crimes against humanity We regularly highlight comments that have made an impression on us. Antoon de Baets left an insightful response to Josie Appleton’s discussion of memory laws in France. متى يتحول خطاب الكراهية إلى خطاب خطير؟ نظرة إلى كينيا وراوندا المحاكمة التي تبدأ قريباً للمذيع جوشوا آراب سانغ تطرح أسئلة جوهرية حول العلاقة بين الكلمات والعنف. هذا ما تناقشه كاثرين بروس-لوكهارت في هذه المادة. Taming the gods: How should we deal with religious threats to free speech? At the 2013 Jaipur Festival, Ian Buruma, Reza Aslan, Ahdaf Souief and Timothy Garton Ash, in conversation with Shoma Chaudhury, talk about the relationship between religion and politics and how to deal with religious threats to free speech. Freedom for history? The case against memory laws Josie Appleton talks to Pierre Nora and Olivier Salvatori of the Liberté pour l’Histoire initiative in France. How has the internet changed the relationship between the writer and the state? The relationship between writers and the state is complex, multifaceted and changing. At the Jaipur Literature Festival 2013 a panel of experts explores some of the issues faced by writers around the world. The practice of freedom Burma’s pro-democracy leader Aung San Suu Kyi stresses the importance of free speech but emphasises the Buddhist idea of “right speech”. War is not cricket! An Indian and a Pakistani student at Oxford reflect on how their countries covered the same story in their own ways. By Zahra Shah and Debanshu Mukherjee. The future of free speech Human Rights activist Aryeh Neier speaks about the future of free speech. هل لقاتل حق في أن يُنسى؟ في عام 2008 طلب اثنان من القتلة المدانين أن تتم إزالة اسميهما من ويكيبيديا ومنابر إعلامية أخرى على الإنترنت، بما ينسجم مع القانون الألماني. هل لحق الفرد في النسيان الأولوية على حق العامة في المعرفة؟ Egypt’s one-way traffic in books Historian Khaled Fahmy describes how historic Egyptian books are more easily found in Western than in Egyptian libraries – and how a scholarly history of the Middle East was recently banned from entering Egypt. Why the EU’s “harmonisation machine” should stay away from history Claus Leggewie and Horst Meier explain why memory laws are the wrong way for Europeans to remember and debate their difficult pasts. كتاب كفاحي لهتلر كسخرية يلقي الكوميدي الألماني سردار سومونكو مقتطفات من كتاب كفاحي للإضاءة على سخافة دعاية هتلر، كما يكتب سيباستيان همفر. كتاب التاريخ الجديد الياباني سبب كتاب تاريخ يهون عن الإمبريالية اليابانية جدل محلي ودولي، يكتب أياكو كومينيو وناوكو هوسوكاوا. قانون الإبادة الأرمينية في فرنسا في يناير 2012، وافق مجلس الشيوخ الفرنسي على قانون يجرم إنكار اي إبادة الجماعية من اعترفت بها الدولة، تكتب كليمنتين دي مونتجوي. Japan: Korean ‘comfort women’ photo exhibit sabotaged A South Korean photographer explains his ordeal in holding an exhibition in Japan that documents ageing ‘Comfort Women’, writes Lee Yoo Eun. How should publishers respond to protests for and against the publication of the same essay? In 2011, three Indian scholars called on OUP India to re-publish an essay which had been denounced by Hindu extremists. Less than two weeks later, the publisher reversed its earlier decision not to re-publish. The vital presence of the past History is a sensitive issue in China with some of it desperately remembered and some, deliberately forgotten, writes Judith Bruhn. Free speech in Turkey & the world – part two Historian Halil Berktay discusses the denial by the Turkish state that the mass murders of hundreds of thousands of Armenians in 1915 constituted a genocide. Free speech in Turkey & the world – part one In the first past of this debate, research fellow Kerem Öktem argues that an individual’s understanding of free speech is shaped by their personal history and geography. حسن جمال: حرية التعبير في تركيا من الشيوعية إلى النزعة الانفصالية الكردية استخدمت الدولة التركية سلسلة من الذرائع لمنع مواطنيها من حرية التعبير، يكتب الصحافي حسن جمال. History reclassified as state secret: the case of Xu Zerong In 2002, historian Xu Zerong was sentenced to 13 years in jail for leaking state secrets. The classification of the leaked materials as “top secret” came only after he had been sentenced, writes Timothy Garton Ash. Susan Benesch: What is the difference between hate speech and dangerous speech? Susan Benesch, senior fellow at the World Policy Institute, discusses hate speech and dangerous speech with Timothy Garton Ash How should the law define dangerous speech? A trio of human rights experts elaborate on the definition of dangerous speech and consider how hate speech is protected both in Europe and under the first amendment in the US. Orville Schell: What controls are beneficial to a free society? China’s attempt to both capitalise on and control the internet is “one of the greatest experiments” in the country’s history, says Orville Schell of the Asia Society. موقع يوتيوب في تركيا تم حظر موقع يوتيوب لمدة ثلاث سنوات في تركيا بحجة أن بعض مقاطع الفيديو المُذاعة عليه كانت مهينة لمصطفى كمال أتاتورك، مؤسس الجمهورية الحديثة، أو مهينة “للتركية”، كتب في هذا الموضوع فوندا أوستك و إيرم كوك. Is criminalisation an effective way of eradicating fascism? The co-chair of the German Green Party tells Free Speech Debate that fascist ideologies cannot be banned and must be confronted in a democratic way. الحياة الخاصة لبطل قومي تم النظر إلى وثائقي يصوّر مؤسس الجمهورية التركية كمال أتاتورك ك»سكّير عربيد« على أنه تعدّ على »التركية« (كهوية)، كما يكتب إيرم كوك وفوندا أوستيك. المحرمات التركية تديم عدم النضج تتحدث الأستاذة عائشة كاديوغلو من جامعة سابانجى عن تجربة انشاءها في تركيا حيث تفرض كثير المحرمات – احيانا قانونيا – وتحاصر المواطنين في حالة عدم النضج. Daniel Bell: What would Confucius make of free speech in the internet age? Confucianism’s defence of political speech does not necessarily apply to other forms of expression, says Bell. Timothy Garton Ash at the Brandenburg Gate: Should we all become a bit more German, or not, when it comes to privacy? Speaking at the Brandenburg Gate on the 22nd anniversary of the fall of the Berlin Wall, Timothy Garton Ash, director of Free Speech Debate, discusses the new barriers to information and communication. نقد الملك التايلندي حُكم على المدون الأمريكي جو غوردون بالسجن لسنتين ونصف في سجن تايلندي لنشره على مدونته روابط لسيرة محظورة للملك التايلندي بوميبول أدولياديج. دراسة حالة تقدمها مريم أوميدي. India’s cartoon porn star The Indian authorities’ decision to ban Savita Bhabhi, an online comic strip featuring a promiscuous housewife with an insatiable appetite for sex, was met with a criticism from the press. Maryam Omidi weighs up whether it was the right decision.
Should governments butt out of history? Eric Heinze examines how states limit speech in order to control public awareness about the past.
‘Lenin-fall’: free speech and the politics of memory in Ukraine O.T. Jones argues that the Ukrainian state should not restrict open historical debate but use its ‘expressive’ powers to foster a nuanced understanding of the past.
Law and historical memory: theorising the discipline Free expression should not be considered as ‘just another’ human right. Any truly participatory political system cannot exist without it nor any legal system linked to such politics, argues Eric Heinze.
In defence of Europe’s memory laws There are two exceptional cases in which memory laws protect free speech, argue Grażyna Baranowska and Anna Wójcik.
Free speech debates are more than ‘radicals’ vs ‘liberals’ Eric Heinze argues that the radicals and liberal grounds for free speech are not mutually exclusive.
What next for Rhodes Must Fall? Free Speech Debate organised a panel discussion on the Rhodes Must Fall campaign and its future. In this video and its highlights, panelists debate the range of issues surrounding the campaign and its impact on free speech. Panelists include Dr David Johnson, Professor David Priestland, Sizwe Mpofu-Walsh and Monica Richter.
When is speech dangerous? Jonathan Leader Maynard examines the difficulties in assessing and managing the role of speech in violence.
‘Oxford University has no regard for black life’ Sizwe Mpofu-Walsh argues that Oxford has shown itself to have no regard for black life in its decision not to remove the statue of Cecil Rhodes.
Cecil Rhodes in Oxford: from unnoticed statue to political scapegoat Monica Richter argues that the inward looking Rhodes Must Fall campaign detracts from greater issues of social justice.
هل اتسمت سياسة فرنسا بالنفاق حيال حرية التعبير؟ في ظل اغتيالات شارلي إيبدو، يفحص آرثر الصرّاف التاريخ الاستعماري الفرنسي المتّسم بالمعايير المزدوجة في الجزائر.
الجاهلون في غزّة: الإعلام الغربي والصراع العربي-الإسرائيلي جون لويد يخوض في تاريخ وضعف تغطية الإعلام الغربي ويقترح طريقاً يمكن أن يحسّنها.
A new initiative to defend free speech in India Hartosh Bal explains the role of the new Freedom Trust in the context of India’s media environment, and how they hope to defend freedom of expression.
Salman Rushdie: What have been the most important changes to free speech in the last 25 years? 25 years after the fatwa and the fall of the Berlin Wall, Salman Rushdie discusses with Timothy Garton Ash whether there is now more or less freedom of expression in Europe, worrying developments in India and his critical view of Edward Snowden.
Should Europe introduce a right to blasphemy? Alain Bouldoires talks to Timothy Garton Ash about the survival of blasphemy laws in Europe, and calls for a ‘right to blaspheme’.
EU versus intellectual freedom? In a bid to synchronise hate crimes, the EU is seeking unity amongst members states against the denial of historical injustices. Is this the EU versus member states’ appreciation of intellectual freedom? Luigi Cajani explains.
The world through the eyes of Russian state television Robert Coalson looks at how Russian television depicts everything from the crisis in Ukraine to the war in Syria.
The long struggle to bury speech crimes in the English-speaking world Anthony Lester and Zoe McCallum look at how the ghost of the English Court of the Star Chamber has been used to suppress free speech.
Ann Wright: Is secrecy necessary for peace and diplomacy? Former US Diplomat Ann Wright speaks to Kim Wilkinson on the need for whistleblowers and institutions like WikiLeaks, but stresses that in some instances secrecy is necessary, such as in peace-making negotiations.
The importance of speaking Catalan Pere Vilanova reflects on his personal experience of learning his ‘native’ tongue – as a third language.
’استعملوا الفرن للحصول على سمرة البحر، كما تعلمون…‘ يستعيد مارك-أنطوان ديلاك كيف واجه تعصباً معادياً للسامية في صف فرنسي، ويحاجج بأن خيراً أكبر يأتي من نقاش حر حول خطاب الكراهية بالمقارنة مع حظره.
Germans are not especially concerned about privacy and sovereignty Nazi past? Stasi past? Sebastian Huempfer challenges the conventional explanations for Germany’s strong reaction to Edward Snowden’s revelations about NSA snooping.
What does George Orwell mean to people in Burma? At the 2013 Irrawaddy Literary Festival, Burmese writers including Pascal Khoo Thwe and blogpoet Pandora talk about George Orwell in the country where he was once an imperial policeman.
Why the US needs more open debate about its failures on race Celebrating the 50th anniversary of the March on Washington must be the beginning of the discussion of race, not the end. Bassam Gergi discusses why the depoliticisation of race in the US is problematic and only open debate can lead to progress.
Why shouldn’t a Hungarian historian call Jobbik “neo-nazi”? Tamás Szigeti explores the asymmetric narrowing of free speech in Hungary.
The difference between genocide and crimes against humanity We regularly highlight comments that have made an impression on us. Antoon de Baets left an insightful response to Josie Appleton’s discussion of memory laws in France.
متى يتحول خطاب الكراهية إلى خطاب خطير؟ نظرة إلى كينيا وراوندا المحاكمة التي تبدأ قريباً للمذيع جوشوا آراب سانغ تطرح أسئلة جوهرية حول العلاقة بين الكلمات والعنف. هذا ما تناقشه كاثرين بروس-لوكهارت في هذه المادة.
Taming the gods: How should we deal with religious threats to free speech? At the 2013 Jaipur Festival, Ian Buruma, Reza Aslan, Ahdaf Souief and Timothy Garton Ash, in conversation with Shoma Chaudhury, talk about the relationship between religion and politics and how to deal with religious threats to free speech.
Freedom for history? The case against memory laws Josie Appleton talks to Pierre Nora and Olivier Salvatori of the Liberté pour l’Histoire initiative in France.
How has the internet changed the relationship between the writer and the state? The relationship between writers and the state is complex, multifaceted and changing. At the Jaipur Literature Festival 2013 a panel of experts explores some of the issues faced by writers around the world.
The practice of freedom Burma’s pro-democracy leader Aung San Suu Kyi stresses the importance of free speech but emphasises the Buddhist idea of “right speech”.
War is not cricket! An Indian and a Pakistani student at Oxford reflect on how their countries covered the same story in their own ways. By Zahra Shah and Debanshu Mukherjee.
هل لقاتل حق في أن يُنسى؟ في عام 2008 طلب اثنان من القتلة المدانين أن تتم إزالة اسميهما من ويكيبيديا ومنابر إعلامية أخرى على الإنترنت، بما ينسجم مع القانون الألماني. هل لحق الفرد في النسيان الأولوية على حق العامة في المعرفة؟
Egypt’s one-way traffic in books Historian Khaled Fahmy describes how historic Egyptian books are more easily found in Western than in Egyptian libraries – and how a scholarly history of the Middle East was recently banned from entering Egypt.
Why the EU’s “harmonisation machine” should stay away from history Claus Leggewie and Horst Meier explain why memory laws are the wrong way for Europeans to remember and debate their difficult pasts.
كتاب كفاحي لهتلر كسخرية يلقي الكوميدي الألماني سردار سومونكو مقتطفات من كتاب كفاحي للإضاءة على سخافة دعاية هتلر، كما يكتب سيباستيان همفر.
كتاب التاريخ الجديد الياباني سبب كتاب تاريخ يهون عن الإمبريالية اليابانية جدل محلي ودولي، يكتب أياكو كومينيو وناوكو هوسوكاوا.
قانون الإبادة الأرمينية في فرنسا في يناير 2012، وافق مجلس الشيوخ الفرنسي على قانون يجرم إنكار اي إبادة الجماعية من اعترفت بها الدولة، تكتب كليمنتين دي مونتجوي.
Japan: Korean ‘comfort women’ photo exhibit sabotaged A South Korean photographer explains his ordeal in holding an exhibition in Japan that documents ageing ‘Comfort Women’, writes Lee Yoo Eun.
How should publishers respond to protests for and against the publication of the same essay? In 2011, three Indian scholars called on OUP India to re-publish an essay which had been denounced by Hindu extremists. Less than two weeks later, the publisher reversed its earlier decision not to re-publish.
The vital presence of the past History is a sensitive issue in China with some of it desperately remembered and some, deliberately forgotten, writes Judith Bruhn.
Free speech in Turkey & the world – part two Historian Halil Berktay discusses the denial by the Turkish state that the mass murders of hundreds of thousands of Armenians in 1915 constituted a genocide.
Free speech in Turkey & the world – part one In the first past of this debate, research fellow Kerem Öktem argues that an individual’s understanding of free speech is shaped by their personal history and geography.
حسن جمال: حرية التعبير في تركيا من الشيوعية إلى النزعة الانفصالية الكردية استخدمت الدولة التركية سلسلة من الذرائع لمنع مواطنيها من حرية التعبير، يكتب الصحافي حسن جمال.
History reclassified as state secret: the case of Xu Zerong In 2002, historian Xu Zerong was sentenced to 13 years in jail for leaking state secrets. The classification of the leaked materials as “top secret” came only after he had been sentenced, writes Timothy Garton Ash.
Susan Benesch: What is the difference between hate speech and dangerous speech? Susan Benesch, senior fellow at the World Policy Institute, discusses hate speech and dangerous speech with Timothy Garton Ash
How should the law define dangerous speech? A trio of human rights experts elaborate on the definition of dangerous speech and consider how hate speech is protected both in Europe and under the first amendment in the US.
Orville Schell: What controls are beneficial to a free society? China’s attempt to both capitalise on and control the internet is “one of the greatest experiments” in the country’s history, says Orville Schell of the Asia Society.
موقع يوتيوب في تركيا تم حظر موقع يوتيوب لمدة ثلاث سنوات في تركيا بحجة أن بعض مقاطع الفيديو المُذاعة عليه كانت مهينة لمصطفى كمال أتاتورك، مؤسس الجمهورية الحديثة، أو مهينة “للتركية”، كتب في هذا الموضوع فوندا أوستك و إيرم كوك.
Is criminalisation an effective way of eradicating fascism? The co-chair of the German Green Party tells Free Speech Debate that fascist ideologies cannot be banned and must be confronted in a democratic way.
الحياة الخاصة لبطل قومي تم النظر إلى وثائقي يصوّر مؤسس الجمهورية التركية كمال أتاتورك ك»سكّير عربيد« على أنه تعدّ على »التركية« (كهوية)، كما يكتب إيرم كوك وفوندا أوستيك.
المحرمات التركية تديم عدم النضج تتحدث الأستاذة عائشة كاديوغلو من جامعة سابانجى عن تجربة انشاءها في تركيا حيث تفرض كثير المحرمات – احيانا قانونيا – وتحاصر المواطنين في حالة عدم النضج.
Daniel Bell: What would Confucius make of free speech in the internet age? Confucianism’s defence of political speech does not necessarily apply to other forms of expression, says Bell.
Timothy Garton Ash at the Brandenburg Gate: Should we all become a bit more German, or not, when it comes to privacy? Speaking at the Brandenburg Gate on the 22nd anniversary of the fall of the Berlin Wall, Timothy Garton Ash, director of Free Speech Debate, discusses the new barriers to information and communication.
نقد الملك التايلندي حُكم على المدون الأمريكي جو غوردون بالسجن لسنتين ونصف في سجن تايلندي لنشره على مدونته روابط لسيرة محظورة للملك التايلندي بوميبول أدولياديج. دراسة حالة تقدمها مريم أوميدي.
India’s cartoon porn star The Indian authorities’ decision to ban Savita Bhabhi, an online comic strip featuring a promiscuous housewife with an insatiable appetite for sex, was met with a criticism from the press. Maryam Omidi weighs up whether it was the right decision.