Filtrar por categoria 'Antisemitism' contendo 8 posts menuProcure tópicos por palavra-chave Academia (2)Access (22)Africa (9)Anonymity (10)Antisemitism (2)Arab Spring (9)Art (15)Article 19 (3)Atheism (2)Australia (4)Blasphemy (16)Blogger (5)Books (1)Brazil (4)Buddhism (2)Burma (3)Canada (2)Celebrity (4)Censorship (38)Charlie Hebdo (2)Child abuse (1)China (12)Christianity (13)Civility (40)Colonialism (1)Copyright (11)Corruption (3)Defamation (28)Democracy (28)Denialism (2)Denmark (1)Discrimination (9)Education (21)Egypt (4)Europe (6)Exclusion (1)Facebook (5)Film (1)Finland (1)France (8)Freedom (51)Gaza conflict (1)Genocide (6)Germany (9)Google (6)Governance (9)Hate speech (24)Hinduism (1)History (20)Homosexuality (5)Humour (2)Hungary (1)Hunger strike (1)India (12)Internet (51)Internet companies (1)Islam (21)Israel (2)Japan (2)Journalism (26)Kenya (2)Knowledge (32)Language (11)Latin America (6)Law (66)Lese majesty (1)Liberalism (14)Libya (2)Literature (6)Media (52)Memory laws (3)Middle East (11)Minorities (5)Money (12)Morality (9)Multiculturalism (12)National security (38)Net neutrality (18)Netherlands (2)Norway (1)Nudity (5)Occupy movement (1)Open source (2)Pakistan (2)Palestine (2)Philippines (1)Piracy (2)Poland (2)Politics (59)Pornography (10)Power (65)Privacy (27)Protest (24)Public Morality (33)Race (1)Radio (3)Regulation (10)Religion (33)Reputation (18)Right to information (61)Russia (2)Rwanda (1)Satire (11)Saudi Arabia (2)Science (10)Scientology (1)Secrecy (1)Singapore (2)Social media (17)South Africa (4)Southeast Asia (3)Sport (1)Surveillance (2)Syria (1)Technology (29)Terrorism (4)Thailand (1)Tunisia (1)Turkey (9)Twitter (9)Ukraine (1)United Kingdom (19)United States (18)Violence (32)Whistleblowing (2)Wikipedia (3)YouTube (1) De tabu a delito – a liberdade de expressão e a “lei boicote” israelita Maja Sojref examina como a lei sobre a prevenção do mal ao Estado de Israel expõe a tensão entre a liberdade de expressão e a segurança nacional. O Charlie Hebdo resvala para caricaturas racistas? A primeira edição da revista desde o ataque no qual foram assassinadas 12 pessoas apresentou um cartoon de Mohamed na capa. Myriam Francois-Cerrah contesta. “That Jew died for you” The group Jews for Jesus published a video entitled “That Jew died for you“, depicting Jesus as a victim of the Holocaust. Rabbi Laura Janner –Klausner called for the offensive video to be removed from YouTube. Brian Pellot discusses the free speech implications. The long struggle to bury speech crimes in the English-speaking world Anthony Lester and Zoe McCallum look at how the ghost of the English Court of the Star Chamber has been used to suppress free speech. ‘They used the oven to get tanned, you know…’ Marc-Antoine Dilhac recounts how he confronted anti-semitic prejudice in a French classroom, and argues that more good comes from an open debate about hate speech than from banning it. Why shouldn’t a Hungarian historian call Jobbik “neo-nazi”? Tamás Szigeti explores the asymmetric narrowing of free speech in Hungary.
De tabu a delito – a liberdade de expressão e a “lei boicote” israelita Maja Sojref examina como a lei sobre a prevenção do mal ao Estado de Israel expõe a tensão entre a liberdade de expressão e a segurança nacional.
O Charlie Hebdo resvala para caricaturas racistas? A primeira edição da revista desde o ataque no qual foram assassinadas 12 pessoas apresentou um cartoon de Mohamed na capa. Myriam Francois-Cerrah contesta.
“That Jew died for you” The group Jews for Jesus published a video entitled “That Jew died for you“, depicting Jesus as a victim of the Holocaust. Rabbi Laura Janner –Klausner called for the offensive video to be removed from YouTube. Brian Pellot discusses the free speech implications.
The long struggle to bury speech crimes in the English-speaking world Anthony Lester and Zoe McCallum look at how the ghost of the English Court of the Star Chamber has been used to suppress free speech.
‘They used the oven to get tanned, you know…’ Marc-Antoine Dilhac recounts how he confronted anti-semitic prejudice in a French classroom, and argues that more good comes from an open debate about hate speech than from banning it.
Why shouldn’t a Hungarian historian call Jobbik “neo-nazi”? Tamás Szigeti explores the asymmetric narrowing of free speech in Hungary.