Free Speech Debate

Thirteen languages. Ten principles. One conversation.

Log in | Register | Mailing list

Loading...
1We – all human beings – must be free and able to express ourselves, and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas, regardless of frontiers.»
2We defend the internet and all other forms of communication against illegitimate encroachments by both public and private powers.»
3We require and create open, diverse media so we can make well-informed decisions and participate fully in political life.»
4We speak openly and with civility about all kinds of human difference.»
5We allow no taboos in the discussion and dissemination of knowledge.»
6We neither make threats of violence nor accept violent intimidation.»
7We respect the believer but not necessarily the content of the belief.»
8We are all entitled to a private life but should accept such scrutiny as is in the public interest.»
9We should be able to counter slurs on our reputations without stifling legitimate debate.»
10We must be free to challenge all limits to freedom of expression and information justified on such grounds as national security, public order, morality and the protection of intellectual property.»

What’s missing?

Is there a vital area we have not addressed? A principle 11? An illuminating case study? Read other people's suggestions and add your own here. Or start the debate in your own language.

Home | Archives | Morality
286771729_a0440dcae0

Child pornography and freedom of expression

Did the European Court of Human Rights wrongly considered the distribution of child pornography to be an exercise of freedom of expression in the case Karttunen v. Finland, asks Rónán Ó Fathaigh.

Published on: April 24, 2013 | Principle 10 | Comments: 0

2123355780_1eef804dcc_z

Free speech as seen by a believer in an Abrahamic religion

Islam, Christianity and Judaism are often accused of wanting to restrict free speech. Dominic Burbidge suggests a radically different perspective, from inside the thought-system of the Abrahamic faiths.

Published on: February 25, 2013 | Principle 4 | Comments: 2

6021327208_f5eea5cb78_z

Prevent harm, allow offence?

Robert Simpson suggests a way to distinguish between harm and offence.

Published on: January 8, 2013 | Principle 4 | Comments: 2

MI5 should increase oversight thumbnail

MI5 should increase oversight

Former MI5 agent Annie Machon speaks about how the intelligence services need to increase internal oversight.

Published on: December 3, 2012 | Principle 10 | Comments: 0

When is it justified to break the Offiacal Secrets Act? thumbnail

When is it justified to break the Official Secrets Act?

Former MI5 agent Annie Machon speaks about when it is in her opinion justified and necessary to break the Official Secrets Act

Published on: December 3, 2012 | Principle 10 | Comments: 0

5879108387_ef7a2b0bef_z

A former British agent makes the case for whistleblowing.

Former British MI5 agent Annie Machon revealed, together with David Shayler, alleged criminal behaviour within the agency. In an interview with Sebastian Huempfer she speaks about the need for official channels through which whistleblowers can voice their concerns.

Published on: December 3, 2012 | Principle 10 | Comments: 1

3932052676_491d8956de_z

Does freedom of expression give us a right to show videos of animals being crushed?

In 2010 president Barack Obama signed a law banning videos that depict animal cruelty. Judith Bruhn explores whether this is a justified restriction to freedom of expression.

Published on: November 30, 2012 | Comments: 8

Amazon Introduces New Tablet At News Conference In New York

Why should Amazon be our taste and decency police?

The online retailer has been criticised for profiting from ebooks featuring terror and violence. No one should tell us what to read, says Jo Glanville.

Published on: June 27, 2012 | Principle 2 | Comments: 2

286080916_86762d483b_z

Improving media ethics in Turkey

A grassroots organisation set up by journalists attempts to create positive change in Turkish media, writes Yonca Poyraz Doğan, a correspondent at Today's Zaman.

Published on: June 11, 2012 | Principle 3 | Comments: 1


Free Speech Debate is a research project of the Dahrendorf Programme for the Study of Freedom at St Antony's College in the University of Oxford. www.freespeechdebate.ox.ac.uk