Free Speech Debate

Thirteen languages. Ten principles. One conversation.

Log in | Register | Mailing list

Loading...
1We – all human beings – must be free and able to express ourselves, and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas, regardless of frontiers.»
2We defend the internet and all other forms of communication against illegitimate encroachments by both public and private powers.»
3We require and create open, diverse media so we can make well-informed decisions and participate fully in political life.»
4We speak openly and with civility about all kinds of human difference.»
5We allow no taboos in the discussion and dissemination of knowledge.»
6We neither make threats of violence nor accept violent intimidation.»
7We respect the believer but not necessarily the content of the belief.»
8We are all entitled to a private life but should accept such scrutiny as is in the public interest.»
9We should be able to counter slurs on our reputations without stifling legitimate debate.»
10We must be free to challenge all limits to freedom of expression and information justified on such grounds as national security, public order, morality and the protection of intellectual property.»

What’s missing?

Is there a vital area we have not addressed? A principle 11? An illuminating case study? Read other people's suggestions and add your own here. Or start the debate in your own language.

Home | Archives | Money
Open Access website (Photo by JenWaller under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike Licence)

Open Access Academic Journals: Go for Gold?

The world of academic publishing stands at a crossroads with public institutions demanding open access to publicly funded research. Dominic Burbidge explores the difficulties that stand in the way.

Published on: February 18, 2013 | Principle 5 | Comments: 4

Announcement Of The Synchronised Swimming Athletes Named in Team GB for the London 2012 Olympic Games

Guilt by association: the London 2012 Olympics

The drive to control all references to the Olympic Games is part of a global creep of intellectual property law that has led to a "right of association", writes Teresa Scassa.

Published on: July 16, 2012 | Principle 10 | Comments: 1

Universities Begin Winter Semester

How open access to scientific journals can help the developing world

Open access publishing models are having a significant impact on the dissemination on scientific information but their impact on the developing world is uncertain, writes Jorge L Contreras.

Published on: July 4, 2012 | Principle 5 | Comments: 0

Amazon Introduces New Tablet At News Conference In New York

Why should Amazon be our taste and decency police?

The online retailer has been criticised for profiting from ebooks featuring terror and violence. No one should tell us what to read, says Jo Glanville.

Published on: June 27, 2012 | Principle 2 | Comments: 2

Indias LGBT Community Celebrates 4th Queer Pride March

Fighting for free speech in an unjust world

A society in which free speech marginalises, rather than empowers, vulnerable citizens is a society in which our moral vision of universal free speech has not actually been achieved, writes Jeff Howard.

Published on: June 8, 2012 | Principle 12 | Comments: 3

Tamiflu Maker Accepts FDA Recommendation On New Warning Label

Did Tamiflu work? How can we know if we can’t find out?

Medical science frequently favours commercial interests over free speech, writes Deborah Cohen of the BMJ.

Published on: May 18, 2012 | Principle 5 | Comments: 1

Ghana President John Atta Mills Visits China

Is China actually helping free media in Africa?

China may provide censorship tools to autocratic regimes in Africa, but western companies still dominate this market, writes Iginio Gagliardone, a post-doctoral fellow at Oxford University.

Published on: May 8, 2012 | Principle 2 | Comments: 5

"We the Corporations v We the People" rally in Capitol Hill (Photo By Bill Clark/Roll Call)

Does money have the right to speak?

The US supreme court's decision on Citizens United raises a vital issue: should corporations have the same free speech rights as individuals? Brian Pellot discusses the case.

Published on: February 10, 2012 | Principle 1 | Comments: 8


Free Speech Debate is a research project of the Dahrendorf Programme for the Study of Freedom at St Antony's College in the University of Oxford. www.freespeechdebate.ox.ac.uk