Free Speech Debate

Thirteen languages. Ten principles. One conversation.

Log in | Register | Mailing list

Loading...
1We – all human beings – must be free and able to express ourselves, and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas, regardless of frontiers.»
2We defend the internet and all other forms of communication against illegitimate encroachments by both public and private powers.»
3We require and create open, diverse media so we can make well-informed decisions and participate fully in political life.»
4We speak openly and with civility about all kinds of human difference.»
5We allow no taboos in the discussion and dissemination of knowledge.»
6We neither make threats of violence nor accept violent intimidation.»
7We respect the believer but not necessarily the content of the belief.»
8We are all entitled to a private life but should accept such scrutiny as is in the public interest.»
9We should be able to counter slurs on our reputations without stifling legitimate debate.»
10We must be free to challenge all limits to freedom of expression and information justified on such grounds as national security, public order, morality and the protection of intellectual property.»

What’s missing?

Is there a vital area we have not addressed? A principle 11? An illuminating case study? Read other people's suggestions and add your own here. Or start the debate in your own language.

Home | Archives | History
75404102_7d6826d75a_z

The difference between genocide and crimes against humanity

We regularly highlight comments that have made an impression on us. Antoon de Baets left an insightful response to Josie Appleton's discussion of memory laws in France.

Published on: May 10, 2013 | Principle 5 | Comments: 0

4990552886_084bcc8ef6_z

Taming the gods: religion and politics

At the 2013 Jaipur Festival, Ian Buruma, Reza Aslan, Ahdaf Souief and Timothy Garton Ash, in conversation with Shoma Chaudhury, talk about the relationship between religion and politics and how to deal with religious threats to free speech.

Published on: April 5, 2013 | Principle 7 | Comments: 0

Eugène_Delacroix_-_La_liberté_guidant_le_peuple

Freedom for history? The case against memory laws

Josie Appleton talks to Pierre Nora and Olivier Salvatori of the Liberté pour l’Histoire initiative in France.

Published on: April 3, 2013 | Principle 5 | Comments: 2

jaipurliteraturefestival-new-image

The writer and the state

The relationship between writers and the state is complex, multifaceted and changing. At the Jaipur Literature Festival 2013 a panel of experts explores some of the issues faced by writers around the world.

Published on: March 15, 2013 | Principle 10 | Comments: 0

Aung San Suu Kyi Makes Election Debut As Myanmar Votes

The practice of freedom

Burma’s pro-democracy leader Aung San Suu Kyi stresses the importance of free speech but emphasises the Buddhist idea of "right speech".

Published on: January 31, 2013 | Principle 1 | Comments: 1

Screen Shot 2013-01-11 at 12 2

The Future of Free Speech

Human Rights activist Aryeh Neier speaks about the future of free speech.

Published on: January 11, 2013 | Principle 1 | Comments: 1

Crystal Palace

Egypt’s one-way traffic in books

Historian Khaled Fahmy describes how historic Egyptian books are more easily found in Western than in Egyptian libraries - and how a scholarly history of the Middle East was recently banned from entering Egypt.

Published on: September 10, 2012 | Principle 10 | Comments: 0

ukraine holodomor

Why the EU’s “harmonisation machine” should stay away from history

Claus Leggewie and Horst Meier explain why memory laws are the wrong way for Europeans to remember and debate their difficult pasts.

Published on: August 6, 2012 | Principle 5 | Comments: 1

How to talk about the Armenian genocide thumbnail

How to talk about the Armenian genocide

Published on: August 1, 2012 | Principle 1 | Comments: 0

'Hitler and the Germans Nation and Crime' Exhibition In Berlin

Hitler’s Mein Kampf as satire

The German comedian Serdar Somuncu recites extracts from Mein Kampf to highlight the absurdity of Hitler’s propaganda, writes Sebastian Huempfer.

Published on: July 13, 2012 | Principle 5 | Comments: 3

TO GO WITH AFP STORY "Japan-NKorea-educa

The Japanese New History Textbook controversy

A history textbook underplaying Japanese imperialism caused controversy domestically and internationally, write Ayako Komine and Naoko Hosokawa.

Published on: July 13, 2012 | Principle 5 | Comments: 0

armenian

France’s Armenian genocide law

In January 2012, the French Senate approved a law criminalising the denial of any genocide recognised by the state, writes Clementine de Montjoye.

Published on: June 29, 2012 | Principle 5 | Comments: 3

2403050317_1eb573a25e_b

Non-state censorship in modern-day India

At an event in Oxford in 2011, three Indian scholars called on OUP India to re-publish an essay which had been denounced by Hindu extremists. Less than two weeks later, the publisher reversed its earlier decision not to re-publish.

Published on: May 24, 2012 | Principle 1 | Comments: 0

Exhibiton On Nanjing Massacre Opens In Beijing

The vital presence of the past

History is a sensitive issue in China with some of it desperately remembered and some, deliberately forgotten, writes Judith Bruhn.

Published on: May 7, 2012 | Comments: 1

hasan cemal

Hasan Cemal: Freedom of expression in Turkey

From communism to Kurdish separatism, the Turkish state has used a series of pretexts to deny freedom of expression to its citizens, says journalist Hasan Cemal.

Published on: April 16, 2012 | Principle 1 | Comments: 0

Arab Students Rally At UC Irvine

Unpacking hate speech

A trio of human rights experts elaborate on the definition of dangerous speech and consider how hate speech is protected both in Europe and under the first amendment in the US.

Published on: March 19, 2012 | Principle 4 | Comments: 0

Turkish flag (Photo by Uriel Sinai/Getty Images)

How Turkish taboos perpetuate immaturity

Professor Ayşe Kadıoğlu of Sabancı University speaks of her experience growing up in Turkey where taboos, many imposed by law, have trapped citizens "in a state of immaturity".

Published on: February 17, 2012 | Principle 5 | Comments: 0


Free Speech Debate is a research project of the Dahrendorf Programme for the Study of Freedom at St Antony's College in the University of Oxford. www.freespeechdebate.ox.ac.uk