Free Speech Debate

Thirteen languages. Ten principles. One conversation.

Log in | Register | Mailing list

Loading...
1We – all human beings – must be free and able to express ourselves, and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas, regardless of frontiers.»
2We defend the internet and all other forms of communication against illegitimate encroachments by both public and private powers.»
3We require and create open, diverse media so we can make well-informed decisions and participate fully in political life.»
4We speak openly and with civility about all kinds of human difference.»
5We allow no taboos in the discussion and dissemination of knowledge.»
6We neither make threats of violence nor accept violent intimidation.»
7We respect the believer but not necessarily the content of the belief.»
8We are all entitled to a private life but should accept such scrutiny as is in the public interest.»
9We should be able to counter slurs on our reputations without stifling legitimate debate.»
10We must be free to challenge all limits to freedom of expression and information justified on such grounds as national security, public order, morality and the protection of intellectual property.»

What’s missing?

Is there a vital area we have not addressed? A principle 11? An illuminating case study? Read other people's suggestions and add your own here. Or start the debate in your own language.

Home | Archives | Anonymity
6764585321_7a93286294_z

Is privacy getting lost in Google’s “cracks and crevices”?

A globally-effective privacy regime is a realistic goal, argues Ian Brown. But it needs giants like Google to get behind it.

Published on: May 23, 2013 | Comments: 0

Screen Shot 2012-11-20 at 15.40.38

Cyber-bullying that led to suicide

On 10 October 2012 the Canadian teenager Amanda Todd committed suicide after years of cyber-bullying and harassment. Judith Bruhn describes a shocking case.

Published on: February 27, 2013 | Principle 2 | Comments: 1

When is it justified to break the Offiacal Secrets Act? thumbnail

When is it justified to break the Official Secrets Act?

Former MI5 agent Annie Machon speaks about when it is in her opinion justified and necessary to break the Official Secrets Act

Published on: December 3, 2012 | Principle 10 | Comments: 0

Wang Xiaoning

Yahoo, free speech and anonymity in China

In 2002 Wang Xiaoning was sent to prison for 10 years after Yahoo passed on personal information Chinese authorities used to identify him. Judith Bruhn explores a case of conflicting laws and moral expectations.

Published on: October 1, 2012 | Principle 10 | Comments: 0

What's WCIT and why WCITLeaks? thumbnail

What’s WCIT and why WCITLeaks?

Eli Dourado provides an overview of what WCIT is and what's at stake. He co-founded WCITLeaks to bring transparency to the ITU's proceedings.

Published on: September 14, 2012 | Principle 2 | Comments: 0

The ITU's murky transparency thumbnail

The ITU’s murky transparency

In July the ITU Governing Council released one summary document of proposed ITR amendments. Dourado says this move did not represent real transparency.

Published on: September 14, 2012 | Principle 2 | Comments: 0

The politics of transparency thumbnail

The politics of transparency

Dourado suspects only the most egregious proposals have been uploaded to WCITLeaks for fear that a mass upload could bring diplomatic backlash.

Published on: September 14, 2012 | Principle 2 | Comments: 0

Internet protest Turkey

Eli Dourado on WCITLeaks’ moral approach to transparency

The WCITLeaks.org co-founder discusses how anonymous uploads to his website are shedding light on the upcoming World Conference on International Telecommunications.

Published on: September 14, 2012 | Principle 2 | Comments: 2

Communication should not be an act of "rebelism" thumbnail

Communication should not be an act of “rebelism”

Published on: September 5, 2012 | Principle 2 | Comments: 0

WCIT: Another four-letter concern thumbnail

WCIT: The net’s next four-letter foe

Published on: September 5, 2012 | Principle 2 | Comments: 0

ACTA's second act? thumbnail

ACTA’s second act?

Published on: September 5, 2012 | Principle 2 | Comments: 0

Why ACTA failed thumbnail

Why ACTA failed

Published on: September 5, 2012 | Principle 2 | Comments: 0

Amelia Andersdotter

Amelia Andersdotter on ACTA’s demise and the internet’s future

The Swedish Pirate Party's outspoken MEP explains why the European Parliament overwhelmingly rejected the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement in July and discusses WCIT, the internet's next four-letter foe.

Published on: September 5, 2012 | Principle 2 | Comments: 0

Orlando Figes

Orlando Figes and the anonymous poison pen

What exactly was wrong with a historian publishing caustic anonymous reviews of his competitors' books on Amazon? Katie Engelhart explores the issues raised by a tragic-comic case.

Published on: August 30, 2012 | Principle 9 | Comments: 2

Defending Facebook's real name policy thumbnail

Defending Facebook’s real name policy

Published on: July 5, 2012 | Principle 2 | Comments: 0

Red_Guards

China’s human flesh search engines

While China's human flesh search engines can help reveal government corruption they can also be used to humiliate ordinary citizens, writes Judith Bruhn.

Published on: July 3, 2012 | Principle 2 | Comments: 1

Facebook Holds Its Fourth f8 Developer Conference

David Kirkpatrick talks Facebook

The author of The Facebook Effect talks to FSD about privacy, anonymity whether the social network plans to go into China.

Published on: June 29, 2012 | Principle 2 | Comments: 0

Activists Protest ACTA Proposal

Jillian York on hacktivism

The director of international freedom of expression at the Electronic Frontier Foundation talks about the ethics and motivations of hacktivism.

Published on: May 23, 2012 | Principle 2 | Comments: 0


Free Speech Debate is a research project of the Dahrendorf Programme for the Study of Freedom at St Antony's College in the University of Oxford. www.freespeechdebate.ox.ac.uk