Free Speech Debate

Thirteen languages. Ten principles. One conversation.

Log in | Register | Mailing list

Loading...
1We – all human beings – must be free and able to express ourselves, and to receive and impart information and ideas, regardless of frontiers.»
2We defend the internet and all other forms of communication against illegitimate encroachments by both public and private powers.»
3We require and create open, diverse media so we can make well-informed decisions and participate fully in political life.»
4We speak openly and with civility about all kinds of human difference.»
5We allow no taboos in the discussion and dissemination of knowledge.»
6We neither make threats of violence nor accept violent intimidation.»
7We respect the believer but not necessarily the content of the belief.»
8We are all entitled to a private life but should accept such scrutiny as is in the public interest.»
9We should be able to counter slurs on our reputations without stifling legitimate debate.»
10We must be free to challenge all limits to free expression justified on such grounds as national security, public order and morality.»

What’s missing?

Is there a vital area we have not addressed? A principle 11? An illuminating case study? Read other people's suggestions and add your own here.

9

We should be able to counter slurs on our reputations without stifling legitimate debate.

Timothy Garton Ash
A personal introduction

Privacy and reputation, the subjects of our eighth and ninth draft principles, are often closely linked - but they are not identical. There can be an infringement of your privacy, which is not a slur on your reputation: suppose you just don’t want people to know that you give half your income to help the poor. There can be a slur on your reputation which is not an infringement of you privacy: for example, the claim that as a government minister you suppressed vital intelligence as a government while making the case for your country to go to war.. (more...)

Do you agree with this principle? Yes No

Discussions

  • Katie Price & Peter Andre win a libel case against the News of the World in 2008 (Photo by Gareth Cattermole/Getty Images)

    What does “reputation” mean?

    The definition of "reputation" is hard to pin down and has varied from age to age and place to place. Let us know your understanding of the word here.

    January 30, 2012 | Comments: 2

More discussions

Case studies

  • Obama And Mexican President Calderon Hold Joint News Conf. At White House

    The Mexican journalist and the “alcoholic” president

    Mexican journalist Carmen Aristegui was fired for publicly calling on President Felipe Calderón to clarify rumours that he suffered from alcoholism, writes Felipe Correa.

    March 14, 2012 | Comments: 1
  • (Source: Spiegel Online)

    The right of reply in Germany

    Germany has a statutory right of reply in the media. Maximilian Ruhenstroth-Bauer explains a path to defending your reputation without going to court.

    February 13, 2012 | Comments: 0
  • photo-5

    Singh v the British Chiropractic Association

    In 2008, the British Chiropractic Association launched a defamation lawsuit against science writer Simon Singh over an op-ed in which he suggested chiropractors lacked evidence for some of their medical claims. Maryam Omidi examines the case.

    February 10, 2012 | Comments: 0
  • The exterior of the Church of Scientology Celebrity Centre International, Los Angeles, California (Photo by Getty Images/Getty Images)

    Tom Cruise sues South Park

    Manav Bhushan and Casey Selwyn question whether it was right for Tom Cruise to threaten to sue US show South Park over an episode that depicted Scientology in a pejorative manner and blatantly hinted that he was gay.

    February 9, 2012 | Comments: 0
  • King Bhumibol Adulyadej of Thailand's 82nd birthday (Photo by Athit Perawongmetha/Getty Images)

    Criticism of the Thai king

    US blogger Joe Gordon was sentenced to two and a half years in a Thai prison for publishing links on his blog to an unauthorised biography of Thailand’s King Bhumibol Adulyadej. A case study by Maryam Omidi.

    February 6, 2012 | Comments: 0

More case studies


Free Speech Debate is a research project of the Dahrendorf Programme for the Study of Freedom at St Antony's College in the University of Oxford. www.freespeechdebate.ox.ac.uk