Free Speech Debate

Thirteen languages. Ten principles. One conversation.

Log in | Register | Mailing list

Loading...
1We – all human beings – must be free and able to express ourselves, and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas, regardless of frontiers.»
2We defend the internet and all other forms of communication against illegitimate encroachments by both public and private powers.»
3We require and create open, diverse media so we can make well-informed decisions and participate fully in political life.»
4We speak openly and with civility about all kinds of human difference.»
5We allow no taboos in the discussion and dissemination of knowledge.»
6We neither make threats of violence nor accept violent intimidation.»
7We respect the believer but not necessarily the content of the belief.»
8We are all entitled to a private life but should accept such scrutiny as is in the public interest.»
9We should be able to counter slurs on our reputations without stifling legitimate debate.»
10We must be free to challenge all limits to freedom of expression and information justified on such grounds as national security, public order, morality and the protection of intellectual property.»

What’s missing?

Is there a vital area we have not addressed? A principle 11? An illuminating case study? Read other people's suggestions and add your own here. Or start the debate in your own language.

3

We require and create open, diverse media so we can make well-informed decisions and participate fully in political life.

Timothy Garton Ash
A personal introduction

Here is one of the most important reasons we need freedom of expression. How can we make good decisions on any issue unless we know the relevant facts and hear the arguments of others? How can we build strong, self-governing communities unless we listen to voices representing all who live in them?. (more...)

Do you agree with this principle? Yes No

Discussions

  • 5566075309_550544f167_z

    George Orwell, Burma and three challenges to free expression

    Timothy Garton Ash delivers the Orwell Lecture at an unprecedented literary festival in Rangoon. He talks about three Orwells and three Burmas.

    April 23, 2013 | Comments: 0
  • 601px-Seal_of_Prime_Ministry_of_the_Republic_of_Turkey.svg

    A Turkish journalist’s censored plea for press freedom

    Kerem Oktem introduces our translation of a column by Hasan Cemal, which his newspaper, Milliyet, refused to print.

    April 12, 2013 | Comments: 1
  • 402-the-delaunay-bar

    Who should guard the Guardian?

    Alan Rusbridger, editor-in-chief of the Guardian, argues that Britain needs both a free press and reform of its failed regulatory system. Since this will require both time and openness, a new independent press regulator should therefore be given a year's trial run.

    April 2, 2013 | Comments: 0
  • buildings in Zawiyah damaged in fighting 2011

    Free speech and the gun in Libya

    Libyan media are crippled by their Gaddafi legacy. Without new regulations and, above all, bravery to stand up to violent intimidation, freedom of speech remains a distant dream, writes Jerry Timmins.

    March 29, 2013 | Comments: 0
  • 8509961275_b2c99ea907_z

    Is Burma sliding back into censorship?

    For all its talk of press freedom, the Burmese government has produced a surprise new bill containing oppressive provisions and undermining the press council it created. Ellen Wiles reports.

    March 21, 2013 | Comments: 0

More discussions

Case studies

  • A Kenyan reads a burnt copy of the Standard newspaper at the printing press in the Kenyan capital Nairobi

    “If you rattle a snake…” The Kenyan government bites its media

    In 2006 the Kenyan police violently raided the offices and printing press of the Standard Group media organisation. What was the government afraid of seeing reported? Dominic Burbidge explores a revealing case.

    March 5, 2013 | Comments: 1
  • Brazilian journalists

    Should journalists need a diploma?

    Brazil’s Supreme Court renewed a law that requires journalists to hold a university degree in journalism. A currently discussed Amendment to the Constitution could further restrict the country’s media writes Felipe Correa.

    August 16, 2012 | Comments: 1
  • 6686068171_c4b0e8e800_b

    Kazeboon: Egypt’s anti-military campaign

    In 2011, a group of young Egyptians organised public film screenings to expose military violence against civilians, writes Hebatalla Taha.

    April 5, 2012 | Comments: 1
  • Silent Walk In Tribute to The Victims Of Shooting In Jewish School

    Broadcasting a massacre

    In March 2012, self-proclaimed jihadist Mohammed Merah strapped a camera to his chest before killing seven people in France. Al-Jazeera TV channel opted not to show the footage, writes Jeff Howard.

    April 2, 2012 | Comments: 2
  • Hungarian Prime Minister Orban Meets Merkel

    Hungary’s new media regulation

    In 2010, the Hungarian prime minister passed a series of laws, giving excessive control over all private media to the government, writes Peter Bajomi-Lazar, a senior research fellow at the University of Oxford.

    March 30, 2012 | Comments: 2

More case studies


Free Speech Debate is a research project of the Dahrendorf Programme for the Study of Freedom at St Antony's College in the University of Oxford. www.freespeechdebate.ox.ac.uk