Free Speech Debate

Thirteen languages. Ten principles. One conversation.

Log in | Register | Mailing list

Loading...
1We – all human beings – must be free and able to express ourselves, and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas, regardless of frontiers.»
2We defend the internet and all other forms of communication against illegitimate encroachments by both public and private powers.»
3We require and create open, diverse media so we can make well-informed decisions and participate fully in political life.»
4We speak openly and with civility about all kinds of human difference.»
5We allow no taboos in the discussion and dissemination of knowledge.»
6We neither make threats of violence nor accept violent intimidation.»
7We respect the believer but not necessarily the content of the belief.»
8We are all entitled to a private life but should accept such scrutiny as is in the public interest.»
9We should be able to counter slurs on our reputations without stifling legitimate debate.»
10We must be free to challenge all limits to freedom of expression and information justified on such grounds as national security, public order, morality and the protection of intellectual property.»

What’s missing?

Is there a vital area we have not addressed? A principle 11? An illuminating case study? Read other people's suggestions and add your own here. Or start the debate in your own language.

2

We defend the internet and all other forms of communication against illegitimate encroachments by both public and private powers.

Timothy Garton Ash
A personal introduction

The internet has made many of us dramatically more free and able to express ourselves, and to receive and impart information and ideas. That freedom is neither perfect nor secure. Criminals, terrorists and paedophiles abuse it. (more...)

Do you agree with this principle? Yes No

Discussions

  • 6915188757_b176fbdf0f_z

    The Copyright Alert System: coming to a home near you?

    The question of how best to respond to the unauthorised dissemination of copyright-protected expression over the internet has long troubled copyright owners. But the proposed solution of a Copyright Alert could potentially erode free speech, writes Graham Reynolds.

    April 10, 2013 | Comments: 0
  • Netizens rally against the anti-cybercrime act in front of the Supreme Court in Manila

    In the Philippines, be careful of what you retweet

    A new cybercrime law in the Philippines would give unfettered powers to the state to monitor internet users, take down websites and imprison citizens writes Purple S. Romero

    January 28, 2013 | Comments: 0
  • 459271450_0ccb8679a1_z

    A sticky WCIT and the battle for control of the internet

    At the World Conference on International Telecommunications (WCIT), authoritarian governments staked worrying claims. But the US-dominated model of non-governmental internet governance brings its own problems, writes Alison Powell. Beware of the Clinton Paradox.

    December 20, 2012 | Comments: 3
  • 2750459700_e470fb8539_z

    Brazil’s online crossroads between authoritarianism and democracy

    Despite Brazil’s democratic accomplishments, laws used to regulate websites date from the 1960s, giving arbitrary power to the state. A proposed ‘Marco Civil da Internet’ has the capacity to change this, writes Marcos Todeschini.

    December 13, 2012 | Comments: 2
  • Neelie Kroes

    What’s a nice UN Internet Governance Forum doing in a place like this?

    The Oxford Internet Institute’s Ian Brown writes from Azerbaijan, asking whether a country that suppresses online freedom should be allowed to host a gathering devoted to discussing it.

    November 8, 2012 | Comments: 2

More discussions

Case studies

  • Screen Shot 2012-11-20 at 15.40.38

    Cyber-bullying that led to suicide

    On 10 October 2012 the Canadian teenager Amanda Todd committed suicide after years of cyber-bullying and harassment. Judith Bruhn describes a shocking case.

    February 27, 2013 | Comments: 1
  • Binnenhof

    Netherlands passes Europe’s first net neutrality legislation

    Amendments approved by the senate of the Netherlands limit the ability of internet service providers to block or slow down applications and services on the internet, writes Graham Reynolds.

    July 9, 2012 | Comments: 0
  • scorpions1

    Censoring The Scorpions

    In 2008, six British ISPs blocked access to a Wikipedia page featuring an album cover with an image of a prepubescent naked girl, writes Maryam Omidi.

    July 2, 2012 | Comments: 0
  • nicolas sarkozy

    Punishing users of extremist websites

    French President Nicolas Sarkozy has proposed a law to punish readers of websites promoting terrorism and violence, writes Clementine de Montjoye.

    May 3, 2012 | Comments: 9
  • Social Networking And Blogging Website Twitter

    A student’s racist tweets

    Liam Stacey, a 21-year-old student, was sentenced to 56 days in prison for posting racially offensive comments on Twitter, writes Maryam Omidi.

    April 20, 2012 | Comments: 30

More case studies


Free Speech Debate is a research project of the Dahrendorf Programme for the Study of Freedom at St Antony's College in the University of Oxford. www.freespeechdebate.ox.ac.uk