Free Speech Debate

Thirteen languages. Ten principles. One conversation.

Log in | Register | Mailing list

Loading...
1We – all human beings – must be free and able to express ourselves, and to receive and impart information and ideas, regardless of frontiers.»
2We defend the internet and all other forms of communication against illegitimate encroachments by both public and private powers.»
3We require and create open, diverse media so we can make well-informed decisions and participate fully in political life.»
4We speak openly and with civility about all kinds of human difference.»
5We allow no taboos in the discussion and dissemination of knowledge.»
6We neither make threats of violence nor accept violent intimidation.»
7We respect the believer but not necessarily the content of the belief.»
8We are all entitled to a private life but should accept such scrutiny as is in the public interest.»
9We should be able to counter slurs on our reputations without stifling legitimate debate.»
10We must be free to challenge all limits to free expression justified on such grounds as national security, public order and morality.»

What’s missing?

Is there a vital area we have not addressed? A principle 11? An illuminating case study? Read other people's suggestions and add your own here.

Home | Audio/Video | Yan Xuetong on a universal value system

Yan Xuetong on a universal value system

For values to be considered universal, at least half the world should accept them, says Professor Yan Xuetong, director of the Institute of International Studies at Tsinghua University.

Print
Published on: February 15, 2012 | 4 Comments

Comments (4)

Automated machine translations are provided by Google Translate. They should give you a rough idea of what the contributor has said, but cannot be relied on to give an accurate, nuanced translation. Please read them with this in mind.

  1. xibaixu says:

    Since YouTube is inaccessible in China, I uploaded the clip to Sina Video, and it was deleted within hours. I am totally baffled because Yan Xuetong is a very well-known scholar in China, and honestly I don’t see anything ‘sensitive’ in the video that would warrant such sanction.

  2. EH says:

    Interesting stuff Xibai – esp his pts about the numerics/temporal nature of ethics. Is it fair to say for him universal values are emergent properties / empirically-revealed codes of behaviour? Rather than something which can be prescribed? Or have I misunderstood?

  3. kangsheng says:

    I’m not sure it’s entirely philosophically coherent, but as one of China’s leading IR intellectuals, it’s interesting to see him lay out some of his moral thinking: he’s argued for a while that if China is really to achieve greatness it “needs a model at home that can inspire people abroad” as well as exercising “moral leadership” in its international environment (see e.g. http://nyti.ms/wu9Z0u). What that actually looks like has sometimes been more elusive, but it would probably need to be a version of universalism “with Chinese characteristics”… He has what sounds like a bit of a shot at describing elements of that here. Will be a big debate for China in the decades ahead…

Leave a comment in any language


Free Speech Debate is a research project of the Dahrendorf Programme for the Study of Freedom at St Antony's College in the University of Oxford. www.freespeechdebate.ox.ac.uk