Free Speech Debate

Thirteen languages. Ten principles. One conversation.

Log in | Register | Mailing list

Loading...
1We – all human beings – must be free and able to express ourselves, and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas, regardless of frontiers.»
2We defend the internet and all other forms of communication against illegitimate encroachments by both public and private powers.»
3We require and create open, diverse media so we can make well-informed decisions and participate fully in political life.»
4We speak openly and with civility about all kinds of human difference.»
5We allow no taboos in the discussion and dissemination of knowledge.»
6We neither make threats of violence nor accept violent intimidation.»
7We respect the believer but not necessarily the content of the belief.»
8We are all entitled to a private life but should accept such scrutiny as is in the public interest.»
9We should be able to counter slurs on our reputations without stifling legitimate debate.»
10We must be free to challenge all limits to freedom of expression and information justified on such grounds as national security, public order, morality and the protection of intellectual property.»

What’s missing?

Is there a vital area we have not addressed? A principle 11? An illuminating case study? Read other people's suggestions and add your own here. Or start the debate in your own language.

Home | Audio/Video | The framing of Orhan Pamuk

The framing of Orhan Pamuk

Writer Maureen Freely talks about the sustained hate campaign in Turkey against the author and Nobel prize winner Orhan Pamuk.

Maureen Freely, the translator of Orhan Pamuk’s novels, discusses the events that led to a sustained hate campaign in his native Turkey. The acclaimed Turkish novelist, who was awarded the Nobel prize for literature in 2006, clashed with the government after speaking out about the 1915 Armenian genocide in a Swiss magazine. Pamuk was charged with “insulting Turkishness” but the case was later dropped following an international outcry. In her talk, Freely talks about Pamuk’s reluctance to speak out about politics. She says: “With fiction and poetry and creative writing you have to have a safe space with which to play … that freedom was very much constrained. It was very very hard for him to write during the intrigue.” Another reason, says Freely for Pamuk’s silence on political issues is his desire to stay alive: “Turkey’s most famous writer is still a death target and is still suffering from the consequences of a hate campaign.”

Print
Published on: May 30, 2012 | No Comments

Leave a comment in any language


Free Speech Debate is a research project of the Dahrendorf Programme for the Study of Freedom at St Antony's College in the University of Oxford. www.freespeechdebate.ox.ac.uk