Prashant Bhushan on a Kashmiri referendum

If the territorial dispute over Kashmir is not addressed through open debate, it may become “another Afghanistan”, says the Indian supreme court lawyer.

In October 2011, Prashant Bhushan, a supreme court lawyer in India, was publicly assaulted after arguing that a referendum on Kashmir would be a legitimate way of resolving the territorial dispute. In this interview, Bhushan tells Free Speech Debate that while the Indian government may continue to assert that Kashmir is an integral part of country, it doesn’t “help things on the ground”. He explains: “If there is disaffection among the people of Kashmir from India, that disaffection needs to be addressed. You cannot address it by having a huge army presence and suppression people by force.” The risk, he adds, is that Kashmir becomes “another Afghanistan”.

(Main image: Photo Paula Bronstein/Getty Images.)

Read more:

Comments (1)

Automated machine translations are provided by Google Translate. They should give you a rough idea of what the contributor has said, but cannot be relied on to give an accurate, nuanced translation. Please read them with this in mind.

  1. nice

Leave a comment in any language


Swipe left to browse all of the highlights.

Free Speech Debate is a research project of the Dahrendorf Programme for the Study of Freedom at St Antony's College in the University of Oxford.

The University of Oxford