Free Speech Debate

Thirteen languages. Ten principles. One conversation.

Log in | Register | Mailing list

Loading...
1We – all human beings – must be free and able to express ourselves, and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas, regardless of frontiers.»
2We defend the internet and all other forms of communication against illegitimate encroachments by both public and private powers.»
3We require and create open, diverse media so we can make well-informed decisions and participate fully in political life.»
4We speak openly and with civility about all kinds of human difference.»
5We allow no taboos in the discussion and dissemination of knowledge.»
6We neither make threats of violence nor accept violent intimidation.»
7We respect the believer but not necessarily the content of the belief.»
8We are all entitled to a private life but should accept such scrutiny as is in the public interest.»
9We should be able to counter slurs on our reputations without stifling legitimate debate.»
10We must be free to challenge all limits to freedom of expression and information justified on such grounds as national security, public order, morality and the protection of intellectual property.»

What’s missing?

Is there a vital area we have not addressed? A principle 11? An illuminating case study? Read other people's suggestions and add your own here. Or start the debate in your own language.

Home | Audio/Video | Chinese journalists test free speech limits

Chinese journalists test free speech limits

Former investigative journalist Haiyan Wang describes the ways in which Chinese reporters push the boundaries of press freedom. Interview by Judith Bruhn.

Although the Chinese media is controlled by the government, journalists are continually looking for ways to push the boundaries, says Haiyan Wang, a former investigative reporter for the South Metropolitan Daily in Guangzhou (22secs). Journalists try to preempt the government by publishing news stories before a ban is issued, she says. They also circumvent bans on topics such as “Tienanmen massacre” by using ambiguous language that invites their audience to read between the lines (2mins 4secs). Other forms of alternative journalism include underground publications, use of personal blogs by journalists, and microblogs such as weibo (4mins). Wang adds that while investigative journalism once thrived in China, it is now “weakening” (12mins 37secs). Journalism nevertheless plays an important role in the country by exposing corruption and helping members of the public to win court cases against the government (12mins 53secs). On microblogs, Wang says she believes they are just a “temporary phenomenon” (18mins 7secs).

Print
Published on: July 27, 2012 | 1 Comment

Comments (1)

Automated machine translations are provided by Google Translate. They should give you a rough idea of what the contributor has said, but cannot be relied on to give an accurate, nuanced translation. Please read them with this in mind.

  1. leanf says:

    You also can see China Media project, a project in The University of Hongkong. A paper written by director Qian Gang. http://cmp.hku.hk/2012/07/11/25293/ And you will get more information about WEIBO, other platforms.

Leave a comment in any language


Free Speech Debate is a research project of the Dahrendorf Programme for the Study of Freedom at St Antony's College in the University of Oxford. www.freespeechdebate.ox.ac.uk