Free Speech Debate

Thirteen languages. Ten principles. One conversation.

Log in | Register | Mailing list

Loading...
1We – all human beings – must be free and able to express ourselves, and to receive and impart information and ideas, regardless of frontiers.»
2We defend the internet and all other forms of communication against illegitimate encroachments by both public and private powers.»
3We require and create open, diverse media so we can make well-informed decisions and participate fully in political life.»
4We speak openly and with civility about all kinds of human difference.»
5We allow no taboos in the discussion and dissemination of knowledge.»
6We neither make threats of violence nor accept violent intimidation.»
7We respect the believer but not necessarily the content of the belief.»
8We are all entitled to a private life but should accept such scrutiny as is in the public interest.»
9We should be able to counter slurs on our reputations without stifling legitimate debate.»
10We must be free to challenge all limits to free expression justified on such grounds as national security, public order and morality.»

What’s missing?

Is there a vital area we have not addressed? A principle 11? An illuminating case study? Read other people's suggestions and add your own here.

Home | Archives | Discussions
Tamiflu Maker Accepts FDA Recommendation On New Warning Label

Did Tamiflu work? How can we know if we can’t find out?

Medical science frequently favours commercial interests over free speech, writes Deborah Cohen of the BMJ.

Published on: May 18, 2012 | Comments: 0

Internet

The tension between data protection & freedom of expression

EU member states should reform the data protection framework to address the realities of life in the Web 2.0 age, writes David Erdos

Published on: May 9, 2012 | Comments: 0

Ghana President John Atta Mills Visits China

Is China actually helping free media in Africa?

China may provide censorship tools to autocratic regimes in Africa, but western companies still dominate this market, writes Iginio Gagliardone, a post-doctoral fellow at Oxford University.

Published on: May 8, 2012 | Comments: 1

Tourist Industry Taps Into The Three Gorges Dam

Open government in Chongqing?

Environmental information is tightly controlled in China despite the existence of access to information regulations, writes Sam Geall.

Published on: May 1, 2012 | Comments: 0

Arab Students Rally At UC Irvine

Why hate speech should not be banned

Restrictions on hate speech are not a means of tackling bigotry but of rebranding often obnoxious ideas or arguments are immoral, argues writer Kenan Malik.

Published on: April 30, 2012 | Comments: 4

Vigil Held After Twin Attacks By Lone Extremist

Media ethics & the Anders Behring Breivik trial

Killer Anders Behring Breivik's testimony should be broadcast live to deter extremism, argues Anne Ardem, executive editor at Norwegian state broadcaster NRK.

Published on: April 26, 2012 | Comments: 2

3469305764_3e732b4ca8_b

Reader’s comment

We regularly highlight comments that have made an impression on us. Today's is from pamela who commented on the case study Can Christians wear the cross at work?

Published on: April 20, 2012 | Comments: 1

Ryan Giggs

Journalists do not have a divine right to invade privacy

Leading free speech expert Eric Barendt defends a British parliamentary report on privacy against criticisms by campaigning journalist John Kampfner.

Published on: April 19, 2012 | Comments: 0

20120405_181729

Hasan Cemal: Freedom of expression in Turkey

From communism to Kurdish separatism, the Turkish state has used a series of pretexts to deny freedom of expression to its citizens, says journalist Hasan Cemal.

Published on: April 16, 2012 | Comments: 0

Obama Announces Appointments Of Clinton, Gates, Nat'l Security Team

Patriot Act and FISA without end?

How the Obama administration continues use of Bush-era powers to suppress legitimate debate about the needs of US national security. By Jeff Howard.

Published on: March 25, 2012 | Comments: 0


Free Speech Debate is a research project of the Dahrendorf Programme for the Study of Freedom at St Antony's College in the University of Oxford. www.freespeechdebate.ox.ac.uk