Thirteen languages. Ten principles. One conversation.
Log in | Register | Mailing list

Medical science frequently favours commercial interests over free speech, writes Deborah Cohen of the BMJ.

EU member states should reform the data protection framework to address the realities of life in the Web 2.0 age, writes David Erdos

China may provide censorship tools to autocratic regimes in Africa, but western companies still dominate this market, writes Iginio Gagliardone, a post-doctoral fellow at Oxford University.

Environmental information is tightly controlled in China despite the existence of access to information regulations, writes Sam Geall.

Restrictions on hate speech are not a means of tackling bigotry but of rebranding often obnoxious ideas or arguments are immoral, argues writer Kenan Malik.

Killer Anders Behring Breivik's testimony should be broadcast live to deter extremism, argues Anne Ardem, executive editor at Norwegian state broadcaster NRK.

We regularly highlight comments that have made an impression on us. Today's is from pamela who commented on the case study Can Christians wear the cross at work?

Leading free speech expert Eric Barendt defends a British parliamentary report on privacy against criticisms by campaigning journalist John Kampfner.

From communism to Kurdish separatism, the Turkish state has used a series of pretexts to deny freedom of expression to its citizens, says journalist Hasan Cemal.

How the Obama administration continues use of Bush-era powers to suppress legitimate debate about the needs of US national security. By Jeff Howard.
