Free Speech Debate

Thirteen languages. Ten principles. One conversation.

Log in | Register | Mailing list

1We – all human beings – must be free and able to express ourselves, and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas, regardless of frontiers.»
2We defend the internet and all other forms of communication against illegitimate encroachments by both public and private powers.»
3We require and create open, diverse media so we can make well-informed decisions and participate fully in political life.»
4We speak openly and with civility about all kinds of human difference.»
5We allow no taboos in the discussion and dissemination of knowledge.»
6We neither make threats of violence nor accept violent intimidation.»
7We respect the believer but not necessarily the content of the belief.»
8We are all entitled to a private life but should accept such scrutiny as is in the public interest.»
9We should be able to counter slurs on our reputations without stifling legitimate debate.»
10We must be free to challenge all limits to freedom of expression and information justified on such grounds as national security, public order, morality and the protection of intellectual property.»

What’s missing?

Is there a vital area we have not addressed? A principle 11? An illuminating case study? Read other people's suggestions and add your own here. Or start the debate in your own language.

Home | Discussions | What’s a nice UN Internet Governance Forum doing in a place like this?

What’s a nice UN Internet Governance Forum doing in a place like this?

The Oxford Internet Institute’s Ian Brown writes from Azerbaijan, asking whether a country that suppresses online freedom should be allowed to host a gathering devoted to discussing it.

Neelie Kroes
Neelie Kroes outside a prison hospital in Azerbaijan (Photo by Ryan Heath)

Freedom of expression has been at the top of the agenda this week in Baku at the Internet Governance Forum, an annual United Nations “multi-stakeholder” meeting. The IGF has previously been held in less democratic states, such as pre-Arab Spring Egypt, and was set up by the UN World Summit on the Information Society held in Tunisia (and Geneva). But the Azerbaijan government has been particularly vicious in its attacks on journalists and bloggers. Eynulla Fatullayev, editor of the Azerbaijan Daily, was jailed in 2007 for criticising the government – after suffering beatings and the kidnapping of his father. Fatullayev recently won UNESCO’s 2012 World Press Freedom Prize. And in 2011, the government threatened activist Elnur Majidli with twelve years in jail for “inciting hatred” (for calling for public protests via Facebook).

Human rights activist and blogger Emin Milli, previously attacked and jailed for “hooliganism”, has written a widely-publicised letter this week to President Ilham Aliyev, warning that “the internet is not free in Azerbaijan and it is definitely not free from fear.” Visiting European Commissioner Neelie Kroes has given a powerful speech stating “these repressive restrictions on media freedom, of whatever kind, are unacceptable… Members of the Council of Europe, including Azerbaijan, should follow the standards they have committed to. I want to pass this message to the President of Azerbaijan.”

Earlier this year, supporters of Azerbaijan’s hosting of the Eurovision song contest claimed it would shine a spotlight on the regime’s human rights abuses. Unfortunately this did not seem to happen to any significant extent. Will the presence of government officials, senior Internet industry figures, and civil society campaigners in Baku this week do any better job in improving human rights?

The EU’s aid and investment to the country might be a more concrete way for the European Commission and member states to put further pressure on President Aliyev’s regime. Perhaps the UN should make sure 2012 is the last year that an event with such significance for freedom of expression is held in a country that has such a questionable commitment to this fundamental right.

This article was republished on the Guardian Comment Network.

Print Save
Published on: November 8, 2012 | 2 Comments

Comments (2)

Automated machine translations are provided by Google Translate. They should give you a rough idea of what the contributor has said, but cannot be relied on to give an accurate, nuanced translation. Please read them with this in mind.

  1. Alexander Ye says:

    Everyone has right to speech on any platform. Regardless of his occupation, his country, his religion.

  2. Brian Pellot says:

    This headline literally made me laugh out loud. Love it!

Leave a comment in any language

Free Speech Debate is a research project of the Dahrendorf Programme for the Study of Freedom at St Antony's College in the University of Oxford.