Free Speech Debate

Thirteen languages. Ten principles. One conversation.

1We – all human beings – must be free and able to express ourselves, and to receive and impart information and ideas, regardless of frontiers.
2We defend the internet and all other forms of communication against illegitimate encroachments by both public and private powers.
3We require and create open, diverse media so we can make well-informed decisions and participate fully in political life.
4We speak openly and with civility about all kinds of human difference.
5We allow no taboos in the discussion and dissemination of knowledge.
6We neither make threats of violence nor accept violent intimidation.
7We respect the believer but not necessarily the content of the belief.
8We are all entitled to a private life but should accept such scrutiny as is in the public interest.
9We should be able to counter slurs on our reputations without stifling legitimate debate.
10We must be free to challenge all limits to free expression justified on such grounds as national security, public order and morality.

What’s missing?

Is there a vital area we have not addressed? A principle 11? An illuminating case study? Read other people's suggestions and add your own here.


Together let us write 10 principles for global free speech. Click. Discuss. Vote.

1We – all human beings – must be free and able to express ourselves, and to receive and impart information and ideas, regardless of frontiers.
2We defend the internet and all other forms of communication against illegitimate encroachments by both public and private powers.
3We require and create open, diverse media so we can make well-informed decisions and participate fully in political life.
4We speak openly and with civility about all kinds of human difference.
5We allow no taboos in the discussion and dissemination of knowledge.
6We neither make threats of violence nor accept violent intimidation.
7We respect the believer but not necessarily the content of the belief.
8We are all entitled to a private life but should accept such scrutiny as is in the public interest.
9We should be able to counter slurs on our reputations without stifling legitimate debate.
10We must be free to challenge all limits to free expression justified on such grounds as national security, public order and morality.

What’s missing?

Is there a vital area we have not addressed? A principle 11? An illuminating case study? Read other people's suggestions and add your own here.


Highlights

Facebook, Privacy and You

Is the age of privacy over? Lord (Richard) Allan from Facebook and Viktor Mayer-Schönberger, author of Delete, go head to head on privacy and the right to be forgotten in the internet era.

FSD launch photos with Jimmy Wales

Were you at the Free Speech Debate launch in January? Check out our slideshow and see if you can spot yourself in our audience. For those of you who were unable to attend, the pictures will no doubt be equally stimulating.

Tim Wu on the right to be forgotten

The author of the Master Switch says that while the right to be forgotten is a good idea in theory, the reality is that it may hamper entrepreneurship in Europe.

Celebrity privacy register

Lord Justice Leveson's proposal for a celebrity privacy register that would allow famous individuals to opt out of the media limelight has divided magazine editors, writes Sebastian Huempfer.

Google Street View in Germany

In March 2011, a Berlin court ruled that Google Street View was not illegal after a private citizen filed a lawsuit, claiming the technology was an infringement of her property and privacy rights. Sebastian Huempfer looks at the case.

How Turkish taboos perpetuate immaturity

Professor Ayşe Kadıoğlu of Sabancı University speaks of her experience growing up in Turkey where taboos, many imposed by law, have trapped citizens "in a state of immaturity".

Kurdish in Turkey, Turkish in Bulgaria

Kerem Öktem compares how the governments of Bulgaria and Turkey treat the language rights of their most important minorities.

Turkish journalists: Şık and Şener

In March 2011, two prominent investigative journalists were arrested in Turkey because of their alleged ties to a terrorist organisation. Ahmet Şık and Nedim Şener face 15 years' imprisonment if they are convicted, write Funda Ustek and Irem Kok.

Daniel Bell on Confucianism & free speech

Confucianism's defence of political speech does not necessarily apply to other forms of expression, says Bell.

Blasphemy law and violence in Pakistan

In 2009, Aasia Bibi, a Christian Pakistani woman was accused of blasphemy. The governor who called for a review of her case was killed two years later, writes Ayyaz Mallick.

Yan Xuetong on a universal value system

For values to be considered universal, at least half the world should accept them, says Professor Yan Xuetong, director of the Institute of International Studies at Tsinghua University.

Wenzhou train collision

On July 23, 2011, two high-speed trains traveling on the Yongtaiwen railway line collided near the eastern coastal city of Wenzhou killing 40 people and injuring 191. A week later, all traces of the train accident had disappeared from newspaper and television programmes, writes Amy Qin.