08Geheimhaltung

Wir müssen befähigt sein, Einschränkungen in der Informationsfreiheit zu hinterfragen, die etwa mit dem Schutz der nationalen Sicherheit begründet werden.

Academia (2)
Access (15)
Africa (8)
Animal Rights (1)
Anonymity (8)
Antisemitism (3)
Arab Spring (5)
Art (17)
Article 19 (2)
Atheism (2)
Australia (5)
Blasphemy (17)
Blogger (5)
Books (1)
Brazil (3)
Buddhism (2)
Burma (2)
Canada (3)
Celebrity (5)
Censorship (32)
Charlie Hebdo (2)
Child abuse (1)
China (8)
Christianity (14)
Civility (38)
Colonialism (1)
Copyright (8)
Corruption (2)
Defamation (23)
Democracy (24)
Denialism (3)
Denmark (3)
Discrimination (9)
Education (20)
Egypt (3)
Europe (4)
Exclusion (1)
Facebook (4)
Film (1)
Finland (1)
France (9)
Freedom (44)
Gaza conflict (1)
Genocide (5)
Germany (9)
Google (4)
Governance (12)
Hate speech (21)
Hinduism (1)
History (19)
Homosexuality (5)
Humour (2)
Hungary (1)
Hunger strike (1)
India (11)
Internet (41)
Internet companies (1)
Islam (21)
Israel (2)
Japan (2)
Journalism (23)
Kenya (2)
Knowledge (29)
Language (10)
Latin America (5)
Law (56)
Lese majesty (1)
Liberalism (14)
Libya (1)
Literature (5)
Media (45)
Memory laws (3)
Middle East (8)
Minorities (4)
Money (12)
Morality (9)
Multiculturalism (10)
National security (32)
Net neutrality (12)
Netherlands (2)
New Zealand (1)
Norway (1)
Nudity (5)
Occupy movement (1)
Open source (2)
Pakistan (3)
Palestine (2)
Piracy (2)
Poland (3)
Politics (55)
Pornography (11)
Power (55)
Privacy (22)
Protest (22)
Public Morality (31)
Race (1)
Radio (2)
Regulation (4)
Religion (38)
Reputation (18)
Right to information (47)
Russia (3)
Rwanda (1)
Satire (14)
Saudi Arabia (1)
Science (8)
Scientology (1)
Secrecy (1)
Singapore (2)
Snowden (1)
Social media (14)
South Africa (5)
Southeast Asia (2)
Sport (1)
Surveillance (3)
Syria (1)
Technology (21)
Terrorism (5)
Thailand (1)
Turkey (8)
Twitter (8)
United Kingdom (14)
United States (16)
Violence (29)
Whistleblowing (4)
Wikileaks (1)
Wikipedia (3)
YouTube (1)

			
					Freedom of speech in Japan and the Designated Secrets Law
				
Arthur Stockwin explains the four main areas where free speech is under threat in Japan.

					Should I go to that conference in Hungary?
				
Boycotts betray free enquiry, but Viktor Orbán’s moves against the Central European University at least make them worth debating, says Eric Heinze

					Is there a universal right to free speech and what are its limits?
				
Timothy Garton Ash in conversation with Nigel Warburton, as part of the Philosophy in the Bookshop series at Blackwell’s, Oxford.

					Dunja Mijatović: What are the biggest threats to free speech in Europe?
				
Dunja Mijatović, OSCE Freedom of the Media Representative, in conversation with Timothy Garton Ash

					An introductory guide to the ten principles
				
Our social media team have created a new way to explore the 10 principles on Youtube.

					Six monarchs, 140 dissidents, one rule: Keep your mouth shut
				
Nicholas McGeehan explores restrictions on free speech and protest in the Arab Gulf states and the foreign policy responsibilities of Western governments.

					5 podcasts and our 10 principles on the BBC
				
Timothy Garton Ash introduces his BBC broadcasts and online version of the Free Speech Debate principles.

					Policing the internet for extremist material
				
Josh Cowls discusses the Oxford Internet Institute’s report on the complexities of balancing security and privacy online.

					The rise and fall of free speech under Turkey’s Islamists
				
Looking at the long sweep of the AKP’s rule, Kerem Öktem shows how the window of free speech in Turkey has closed.

					Geheimhaltung
				
Wir müssen befähigt sein, Einschränkungen in der Informationsfreiheit zu hinterfragen, die etwa mit dem Schutz der nationalen Sicherheit begründet werden.

					Non-governmental organisations v Government of India: dissent and development in tension
				
Mujahid Mohammad discusses how India’s government has prioritised economic development over free speech.

					In India, the censor’s razor is here to stay
				
Udit Bhatia explores the changing nature of state censorship of film in India and prospects for the future.

					Vom Tabu zum Delikt – Meinungsfreiheit und das israelische „Boykottgesetz“
				
Maja Sojref erörtert, wie ein Gesetz, dass den israelischen Staat vor Schaden bewahren soll, Spannungen zwischen Meinungsfreiheit und nationaler Sicherheit offenlegt.

					How and why Hong Kong’s press downplayed the ‘umbrella movement’ of 2014
				
Rebecca Wong describes the combined pressures of Chinese political power and the interests of media proprietors.

					How a Weibo post gets censored
				
Jason Q Ng traces the path of a censored Weibo post and tracks keywords that trigger automatic review.

					How Russia’s media pluralism was eroded under Vladimir Putin
				
Maryam Omidi describes a mapping of the Russian media landscape in 2014.

					Woran erkennt man Zensur im Internet?
				
Joss Wright erläutert die technischen und ethischen Herausforderungen bei der Erforschung von Zensur im Internet.

					A new initiative to defend free speech in India
				
Hartosh Bal explains the role of the new Freedom Trust in the context of India’s media environment, and how they hope to defend freedom of expression.

					National Security: Sample our intellectual buffet. Or make your own meal.
				
Timothy Garton Ash introduces a sample tour of the content on our site. 

					Salman Rushdie: What have been the most important changes to free speech in the last 25 years?
				
25 years after the fatwa and the fall of the Berlin Wall, Salman Rushdie discusses with Timothy Garton Ash whether there is now more or less freedom of expression in Europe, worrying developments in India and his critical view of Edward Snowden. 

					Should Europe introduce a right to blasphemy?
				
Alain Bouldoires talks to Timothy Garton Ash about the survival of blasphemy laws in Europe, and calls for a ‚right to blaspheme‘.

					Vote for Hong Kong – on the streets and online
				
In 2014, the citizens of Hong Kong staged an unofficial civil referendum in protest against the Beijing authorities’ attempts to undermine its independence. As Rebecca Wong reports, the majority of the votes were cast via a voting app on mobile phones.

					Importierte Repression im Nahen Osten
				
Ein veröffentlichtes Dokument des ägyptischen Innenministeriums vom Juli 2014 belegt die Ausschreibung von Cybertechnologien zur Überwachung von Blasphemie, Sarkasmus und „mangelnde Moral“. Ein Bericht von Max Gallien.

					Obszönitäten, Reinheit und Politik – der Kampf um die russische Sprache
				
Im Juli 2014 trat in Russland ein Gesetz in Kraft, dass die Benutzung von Schimpfwörtern in der Kunst verbietet. Maryam Omidi erörtert seine Auswirkungen.

					14 year-old’s Twitter prank leads to arrest in the Netherlands
				
A prank by a 14 year-old Dutch girl on Twitter prompted both her arrest – and broader questions about free speech, as Max Harris discusses.

					EU versus intellectual freedom?
				
In a bid to synchronise hate crimes, the EU is seeking unity amongst members states against the denial of historical injustices. Is this the EU versus member states’ appreciation of intellectual freedom? Luigi Cajani explains.

					How an attempt at ‘libel tourism’ rebounded on a Tanzanian tycoon
				
A British citizen blogged about a Tanzanian media magnate involved in throwing her and her husband off their Tanzanian farm. He sued for libel in a British court. Dominic Burbidge explains.

					National security and privacy: striking the balance
				
Anthony Lester and Zoe McCallum discuss the need to balance national security and privacy in the age of internet surveillance.

					In Ecuador, cartoonist gets the last laugh
				
Kim Wilkinson looks at an unusual order to ‘correct’ a cartoon, and the cartoonist’s clever reply. 

					Warum Yale University Press die dänischen Cartoons nicht veröffentlicht hat
				
John Donatich, Direktor der Yale University Press, erklärt und verteidigt seine Entscheidung, Jytte Klausens Buch ohne Illustrationen zu publizieren.

					Warum Yale University Press die dänischen Cartoons nicht veröffentlicht hat
				
John Donatich, Direktor der Yale University Press, erklärt und verteidigt seine Entscheidung, Jytte Klausens Buch ohne Illustrationen zu publizieren.

					Jytte Klausen: Should Yale University Press have removed images from the Danish cartoon controversy?
				
Professor Jytte Klausen analyses and criticises Yale University Press’s decision to remove images of Muhammad from her scholarly book on the Danish cartoons controversy.

1 2 Weiter »

Suche

Anmelden

Sprache